Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • i point you to two threads whereby you'll see an explanation by andy (post 22 here) https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/410486-lowell-interim-charging-order-from-credit-card-debt-2009/?tab=comments#comment-4912902   and   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/406428-remortgage-issue/   if yours says:    written notice of the disposition was given to XX Council ( - disposition = sold vis: disposed of) ..... notice means letter telling them it's been sold -    doesn't say it must be paid or settled BEFORE disposition..   that's the way i read it.          
    • dx100uk   You are absolutely correct. That's exactly what the wording is! And if that's the case then - happy days for me! However, I thought that:   1. This wording meant the conveyancing solicitor had to tell the council that the house was about to be sold so they were aware!   But you are saying that the council only needs to be informed AFTER the house has been sold? Can I tell the council that? [I think I've seen something on the internet that says I can, rather than the CS] Or do I need the conveyancing solicitor to contact the council?   2. That this wording wasn't a restriction K [as I'd looked at Schedule 4 of the Standard Forms of Restriction] and tried to match my wording to those listed - and thought restriction K was the closest.     3. That this was a non-standard restriction [and that's what the Land Registry told me too and that the restriction was not a Restriction K!!! [see extract below]   Please remember that when applying for a restriction not in standard form:   it must always contain the words ‘is to be completed by  registration’ rather than ‘is to be registered’. This will serve to make the effect of the restriction clear. The term ‘registered’, where used in any of the standard form restrictions, means the completion of a registrable disposition by complying with the relevant registration requirements prescribed in Schedule 2 to the Land Registration Act 2002 (rule 91(3) of the Land Registration Rules 2003), but this statutory definition only applies to standard form restrictions. Please note that we will not accept restrictions not in standard form for registration that contain the words ‘is to be registered’   So I'm confused now. IF it is a restriction K - then the conveyancing solicitor doesn't have to do anything and I can let the council know.   It seems it is dependent on the wording 'completed by registration' and 'is to be registered'???   Below is copied from Martin's MSE.   This relies again on the 'is to be registered' whereas my wording is ' completed by registration' which you say is restriction K and LR says is not.   I need to go to sleep now!   Thanks dx.   Extract from MSE below.   If your property is jointly owned a creditor will not be able to obtain a CO against you, they can only get what is called a restriction. The laws on Restrictions are totally different to Orders, the most important being there is NO OBLIGATION for you to pay any of the proceeds of the sale to the creditor. However, during the whole court process you go through the reference from all parties (especially the creditor) will be to charging order and NOT to restriction. This is done in order to deceive you believing you are stuck with a CO. However, not all solicitors are aware of the law in this regard and it is important that you raise this point with them in the first instance before proceeding with them Quote: Restriction The restriction which can be entered on the register where a charging order is made against one of joint proprietors is in the following form :- No disposition of the registered estate is to be registered without a certificate signed by the applicant for registration or his conveyancer that written notice of the disposition was given to [name of person with the benefit of the charging order] at [address for service], being the person with the benefit of /I]an interim[I/I]a final[I charging order on the beneficial interest of (name of judgment debtor) made by the (name of court) on (date) (Court reference.…).        
    • Hi Tony,   Please ensure YF does NOT acknowledge any debt  when confirming their new address.   They should simply state, " Please note my new address, as shown above."   Do not say anything about "a debt owed", or "the money you are chasing."   Do nothing that resets the SB Clock - ie acknowledging the debt and causing probs for the next 6 years. 
    • you ring you bank    
    • i suspect the charge on the Land registry site against the house reads:   2. (XX.XX.2007) RESTRICTION: No disposition of the registered estate is to be completed by registration without a certificate signed by the applicant or his conveyancer that written notice of the disposition was given to XX Council at P.O. Box XX, STREET, TOWN, POSTCODE, being the person with the benefit of a Charge under Section 22 of the Health and Social Services and Social Security Adjudications Act 1983.   ..............   that is a restriction k and is useless to the council, as all 'legally' your have to do is inform them AFTER the house has been sold . then it's too late money has gone.   dx
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
NGEddie

PPi and life insurance on same claim?

Recommended Posts

Positive update, I think!

 

I had another RBS lettter referring to the mortgate protection plan this time.

 

I believe this was 1999 at £7.00 a month which may have stopped in 2003?

 

Then in 2003 at £5.00 a month a Life protector descreasing term assurance, this is still collecting but with Aviva.

 

There are no dates or account numbers but the letter says PPI refund £800.000 odd, interest at £1k odd, minus £200.00 tax , offer of £1700.00 ish.

 

Unless there is another PPi review on going, this may it for the PPi and Life protector, which is possibly not enough as even £5.00 a month over 20 years is £1200.00 but they are quoting £800.00 as refund.

 

What is my best move now please?

 

Cheers

 

E!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

check their data...

if you haven't got it ask for the data they used to calculate your refund.


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have some data!

 

Called and was told it was mortgage protection plan from December 2000 until May (first advisor said August) at £16.00 a month which they make £817.00 and I make £866.00 or £915.00 depending which month you choose, I guess I should question their figure?

 

They advised there is an overfraft and mortgage claim still waiting assesment?! which I have no idea about!

 

What I do know, is I have paperwork and policy number for a mortgage PPi which started December 2000 but was for £7.00 a month, so confused!

 

The other one is this RSA Life protector decreasing term assurance which started in 2003 at £5.00 a month, was advised I must have with the mortgage , transfered from RSA to Aviva in 2011 and is still going! Have paperwork and policy number for this.

 

When I mentioned this on the phone the woman quickly said 'we dont do life insurance' but this is life 'assurance' and was told I must have it!

 

Please advise on the best way to approach this.

 

Many thanks

 

E!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rubbish


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, NGEddie said:

When I mentioned this on the phone the woman quickly said 'we dont do life insurance' but this is life 'assurance' and was told I must have it!

 

it was not an endowment mortgage!! so it's PPI.


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks.

 

So do I write or email quoting the policy numbers and ask them to investigate this too then?

 

Being honest this started in 2003 and cannot recall exactly how, but know I was advised at some time I needed to have this alongside a mortgage?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you have already started a PPI reclaim, it should be included in that.

you cant start a new claim as new claims are now time barred..

 

you need to make it clear to them, that it was NOT an endowment mortgage so there was NO requirement for a life assurance policy, so whatever it is , it was missold protection.


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is included, on your advice I worded it as 'PPi and associated insurances' to cover this.

 

Thanks, I have another PPi letter on the way apparently so i'll wait on what is says!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter was advising I did not have PPi on an overdraft, weird!

 

you need to make it clear to them, that it was NOT an endowment mortgage so there was NO requirement for a life assurance policy, so whatever it is , it was missold protection.

 

Am I best to email or write?

 

Dear PPi team

 

In your letter dated xxxx you have confirmed I was indeed mis-sold the mortgage protection insurance, but have not mentioned the life protector assurance which started on xxxx at £x.xx per month and currently debiting my account. I was advised by yourselves the mortgage protection insurance and RSA Life protector decreasing term assurance were compulsory for my situation and type of mortgage. My mortgage was not an endowment mortgage and now know there was no requirement for a life assurance policy.

 

Sound ok?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this read ok to send?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why not simply say...

 

My mortgage was not an endowment mortgage , there was no requirement to have any insurances, whatever their name.

please refund all insurances , they were all a form of payment protection.

 

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, they have already agreed to refund the actual mortgage protection plan, the figures are wrong and they are recalculating them.

 

Is email ok/better/quicker?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what about the papertrail if you have to goto the FOS?

 

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll write then

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As they have already acknowledged the 'payment protection insurance' been mis-sold, this should be ok?

 

Thank you for your letter dated xxxx which advises you are upholding my miss-selling of PPi and associated insurances complaint.

 

My mortgage was not an endowment mortgage, there was no requirement to have any insurances, whatever their name. Please refund all insurances, they were all a form of payment protection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to send this next week ideally, if reads ok?

 

I wasnt sure if to quote the reference number of the life assuarance in  the second paragraph somwhere?

 

Many thanks

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote to you on xxx august 2019 wanting to reclaim the numerous compulsory protection policies you made me takeout in year concerning

 my mortgage agreement number xxx dated xxx.

 

you replied in letter dated xxx concerning a payment protection policy but appear to have failed to address the RSA Life protector decreasing term assurance {policy number xxx) which transferred from RSA to Aviva in 2011, which I point out i am is still paying to date, within your above ref'd offer letter.

 

i should not need to point this out, but, the Mortgage i signed upto was not an endowment policy, therefore there was NO legal requirement to have, nor should you have made, either policy compulsory. The only beneficiary was yourselves through ultimate direct payment should I die settling your mortgage sum.

 

please address this issue 

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx 👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually send everything recorded, trying to social distance and didn't really want to go to the post office, or should I?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wasting money by using recorded is not needed on most letters 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a few missed calls and then text from RBS wanting to talk about the letter I sent, two posts up. 

 

Am I best to wait for them to write? Didn't really want to get into a discussion with them about it ideally!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

simply tell them on the phone writing only sorry as I might want to escalate this to the fos or court.

sorry but no speaky..speaky

 

you night find this interesting?

 

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2012/jun/09/life-insurance-misselling-aviva-hamilton-life

 

dx


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx, interesting article and good on Aviva

 

Got a letter from RBS...

 

'Our dept only deals with PPi and a separate complaint would need to be raised with the decreasing term insurance team. We have asked this team to contact you'

 

What do you think the next best step is?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...