Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks all for all your input. I have decided to follow this all the way. So far, I have not replied to Alliance Parking's original NTK letter. The time-period for the reduced amount has now finished, and the time to appeal (21 days from the date of letter) will finish on 25th Apr. No further comms received from Alliance Parking. Could you please guide me, for my readiness, on what happens next? Am I going to start receiving letters from Alliance Parking > Debt Collector letters > Letter of Claim? Who sends me the Letter of Claim - Alliance Parking / Debt Collectors / Solicitors / court? How many weeks / months from now is this likely to be? Once Alliance Parking passes the debt off to the Debt Collectors, is there a risk of anyone turning up at the door? Do I need to reply to any other letters from either the parking company, debt collectors, or solicitors? Many thanks in advance.
    • I've just noticed this so wanted to my apologies for my response to this yesterday I didn't realise his name was worry, I thought you meant worry as in be concerned not referring to his name.   My apologies.
    • We've already encouraged worry to use their own words... HB
    • Whoops 😅 Vanquis - September 2015 Jacamo - January 2016 Very - December 2013
    • Pretty good first draft   Only question I have is did you use a template from this forum to write it?   Parts of It just seems very familiar, and I'm concerned if TFL see people just copying and pasting stuff they've seen before it won't be as effective.   If not then I'd say its good but allow others to give their feedback.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

hoistuk/Cohen PAP LOC? - ex barclaycard debt


big blue one
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1609 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I've tried my best to have a read of the postings but am finding it all a bit daunting as nothing really seems to tally up completely with what I have received...

 

I believe I'm doing the right thing in posting the below...but will also upload the letter if possible with personal details omitted of course. :)

 

 

Name of the Claimant -------HFUKHIL (ex barclaycard)

 

Date of issue – 08/08/2019

 

Date of issue 08th + 19 days =26th august + 14 days to submit defence = 9th september (33 days in total) -

 

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 

this debt originates from a written agreement dated 29/01/2010 between the original creditor detailed above and you. the agreement was subsequently terminated when its terms were not complied with.

 

our client later purchased this account and it was legally assigned on 5/9/18. the notice of assignment has previously been provided to you.

 

there have been no interest or administrative fees/charges applied to the account since we acquired it.

 

you should note that this letter is being sent in accordance with the pre-action protocol for debt claims of the civil procedures rules. the court rules confirm the actions either party must take before a matter goes to court, we should point out that paragraph 7 sets out its expectations for you and our client in how to comply with the protocol. the full protocaol is available from the court service at https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts.procedure-rules/civil/protocol

 

despite our client or its agents, robinson way limited, attempts to engage with you to agree a suitable payment plan, the above amount remains unpaid.

 

 

What is the total value of the claim? £3950

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC ( Pre Action Protocol) ? Not sure what this means? 

 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? last change of address in 2014

 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? no


Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? credit card account (based on the account num provided

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?after

 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I dont but likely online

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/ Equifax /Etc...) ? not a single trace anymore have checked all credit refs

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. ----assigned to robinson way it seems

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?  I likely would have but have been a head buried in the sand kind of guy

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? again unsure due to time frame etc

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? I have been receiving correspondance but again, head buried in sand numpty. I believe i was paying £1 per month to them up to a point but changed bank account and never updated which was around may 2018

 

Why did you cease payments? i would say around may 2018 purely due to an oversight as i was/am paying £1 per month to a few debtors resulting from a financially messy divorce

 

What was the date of your last payment? may 2018 i belive

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? not to my knowledge

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? was paying £1 per month to the debt until recently and didn't realise this is one that had got lost when moving accounts. 

 

 

 

 

:D
Link to post
Share on other sites

Images should only be in one multipage pdf file

Read upload

 

so have you received an N1 claimform from northants bulk court?

or

a letter of claim from a tame/fake paperwork only solicitor?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

" you should note that this letter is being sent in accordance with the pre-action protocol for debt claims of the civil procedures rules. the court rules confirm the actions either party must take before a matter goes to court, we should point out that paragraph 7 sets out its expectations for you and our client in how to comply with the protocol. the full protocaol is available from the court service at https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts.procedure-rules/civil/protocol "

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC ( Pre Action Protocol

) ? Not sure what this means? 

 

 

See below

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/406231-the-pre-action-protocol-for-debt-claims-is-made-by-the-master-of-the-rolls-as-head-of-civil-justice-1st-oct-2017/

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

part of the hoist uk group

 

can you scan up what you have please 

to ONE multipage PDF file

read upload

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

every 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to hoistuk/Cohen PAP LOC? - ex barclaycard debt
  • 4 weeks later...

best to remove you name eh?

I've removed your upload

 

it a letter of claim 

 

so best get your back quickly.

follow this:

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get that reply form running 

follow post 9 link TODAY

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

in a nutshell

 

but we don't know the debt history 

so tell us all about it 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All results from a messy divorce. in all honesty, I couldn't say one way or another what the crack is as it's been 10 years, nothing is shown on my credit history for any of my debts.

 

I think I may have been paying £1 a month to the account until a year ago when I changed banks and it appears it may have gone amiss.

 

Somehow, I get the feeling that they won't be able to provide any docs as there's nothing listed on my credit file? I may be wrong of course, 

:D
Link to post
Share on other sites

Rarely other than the 620000 rubbish they reply with.

 

lots of threads here to read

 

shame you blindly paid £1pcm on loads of debts

all youve done is run the sb date into infinity

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCa REQUEST THE LOT OF 'EM IF YOU ARE STILL BLINDLY PAYING?

opps sorry caps..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you ever?

if not just use the last bit alone.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

oh damn this mug found CAG..

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you've been here since 2006....

 

what to DCA's try and do to people....????

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they try and MUG people on debts they don't owe or that are not legally enforceable...

 

yours is not the next move

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...