Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Aesmith - Thank you for your recent interest in my issues.  Input on people's topics can be most useful from specialised experts or those that have similar experiences.  Some people really struggle with knowing what to do (I certainly do) - so it is most useful and helpful and reassuring when solid sensible advice is offered.  I have found there to be some very kind, helpful, supportive and legally knowledgeable people here on cag over the years - who give sound legal advice for people to roll up their sleeves and follow up on.   Of course, sometimes it can be quite challenging sifting the wheat from the chaff.  I don't have lawyer or barrister.  I sometimes attend pro-bono legal clinics for help.  And sometimes have access to barristers via a pro-bono service called Advocate.  Both ad-hoc. 
    • The Judge was wrong. The keeper is only INVITED to say who was driving, there is no obligation for them to say.
    • Member of the Question Time audience asks Richard Tice about Donald Trump.    
    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Superannuation money stuck in Australia


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4780 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Here's another interesting situation ... not sure if anyone can help. I have a (rather large) pot of Superannuation money stuck in Australia - I cannot take it out early unless I give up my Australian passport. I will be taking out British citizenship soon (I have recently become eligible) and renouncing my Australian citizenship and returning my AU passport. This means I have no rights to return to OZ, and can withdraw my Superannuation money (less 35% tax).

 

I've contacted my Super fund to ask about the procedures on how to do this. They sent me a form with instructions, that says I must go through the ATO (Australian Tax Office). Once the ATO gives the OK, then the Super fund will release the money.

 

Here's my problem: I owe some back taxes to the ATO that I cannot afford to pay ... I'm wondering if they can somehow intercept the release of my Superannuation money to satisfy the outstanding tax debt.

 

Anyone know?

 

Thanks.

 

W.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's my problem: I owe some back taxes to the ATO that I cannot afford to pay ... I'm wondering if they can somehow intercept the release of my Superannuation money to satisfy the outstanding tax debt.
I would assume that any tax you pay on your superannuation will alert the tax office that you have funds & they'll most probably pursue for payment. Whether they can take it directly I don't know but they would more than likely take the legal route & possibly garnishee your funds.
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's weird - from the procedures and looking at the ATO's online application, it appears that the ATO only verifies that I'm no longer an AU resident for tax purposes. Providing your Tax File Number on the ATO application is optional.

 

I'm really worried, because I really need this money to pay off debt here in the UK to get my head above water. I want to be sure the ATO won't confiscate it.

 

From what I remember, Superannuation in Australia is exempt from virtually any liens in order to preserve people's retirement funds.

 

W.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ATO are very good at recovering Commonwealth debts, they deducted $150 from my 2007 tax return for a supposed overpayment of Austudy in 2002, shortly after I left the country. I think you are at a substantial risk of the ATO deducting any Commonwealth debts from your super. Have you tried trawling the ATO website - there's bound to be a guidance about this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I may have to find a lawyer and/or financial planner in Australia who can advise me before I make an attempt to access the money.

 

I am in debt up to my neck here in the UK, and my Super would really help to clear most of it, and put me in much better financial shape. I have built up a very large pension account here in the UK (I contribute quite a large pre-tax amount from my salary, and have a very generous employer match) - so I'm not really worried about not having retirement income.

 

Damn, why is everything SO difficult....?

 

W.

:|

Edited by cerberusalert
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the pension system in the UK is great, I whacked a whole lot into a pension while working there, and then if you haul it over into your super in Australia within six months of returning, you avoid the 15% Australian tax. What about making a hardship application to the Australian super fund? I do not know whether the ATO gets involved with that, you'll need to seek advice. If the ATO aren't involved then that might be a way to access your Australian super without going through the renouncing citizenship path.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been doing more research on this, and the situation seems to be that anyone who leaves Australia (but has the right to return ... either to work, or to retire) can keep their Superannuation in the existing fund and manage it as if you were still there. It is preserved until you reach retirement age, which depends on the year you were born (age 57 in my case).

 

However, if you were in Australia on a TEMPORARY visa that has expired, the Super fund can transfer your retirement savings to the ATO, and the ATO will hang on to it (without earning any returns) and release it to you if you ask.

 

My situation is somewhat complicated, in that I obtained Australian citizenship whilst living in Australia. So long as I remain an Australian citizen, my Super fund is "preserved" until retirement age and I cannot access the money. I could try to access it via a "hardship" request, but I doubt that I would qualify - and even if I did, there is no guarantee I could access the entire amount.

 

So it appears I have two choices: (1) Leave the money there and let it continue to grow until I reach the age in which I can access the money (8 years from now); or (2) Renounce my Australian citizenship after I obtain my UK citizenship, then apply to have the money released (with the risk that the ATO will seize it).

 

I am going to pursue option (2) with the assistance of an Australian tax attorney. This will cost me some legal fees, but it should be worth it since my Super fund is nearly A$50,000. If the attorney is unable to provide me with assurance that the ATO will not sieze the money, then I will leave it in the fund until retirement.

 

I'm hoping I can access it ... even after the 35% penalty tax, it will put a serious dent in my outstanding debts and enable me to pay off the rest pretty quickly. Then I can see about setting up a payment plan to pay off the ATO.

 

My next goal is to find an AU attorney who can advise/assist me - which is somewhat difficult from abroad. If anyone has any suggestions, please let me know.

 

W.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The preservation age actually varies depending on the year in which you were born:

 

Before 1 July 1960: 55

1 July 1960 - 30 June 1961: 56

1 July 1961 - 30 June 1962: 57

1 July 1962 - 30 June 1963: 58

1 July 1963 - 30 June 1964: 59

From 1 July 1964: 60

 

http://www.ato.gov.au/super/content.asp?doc=/content/60489.htm&page=9&H9

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have made contact with a solicitor in Australia who has agreed to assist me in this matter. They specialise in tax and superannuation matters. They estimate the fees will be 5 hours of work at A$450/hour - total A$2,250.

 

I have explained my situation in detail, and have asked them THREE times if they think the ATO is likely to seize my super if I attempt to withdraw it. They have not answered my question, which makes me suspicious.

 

I would think they would reply with something like: "We believe the ATO is likely to seize your funds because .... bla bla bla .... and in our experience this happens ... bla bla bla." But they are silent on the matter - they just say they will assist me for an estimated fee of A$2,250.

 

I estimate that - after tax - I would have access to A$26,000 of super funds but would have to pay legal fees of ~9% of that.

 

I'm not sure what to do ... I can't find anyone that can tell me the likelihood of the ATO seizing the money. It could be that the ATO doesn't even check on any taxes due, and simply verifies that I am no longer a resident/citizen. Or, maybe that's WHY the ATO needs to provide approval for withdrawal of Super ... to make sure no outstanding taxes are due.

 

SOMEONE HELP!!

 

W.

:violin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO, I wouldnt be parting with any money to a solisitor firm charging 450 an hour?? What if their estimate is wrong and they suddenly say 'oh we now have to charge this because' Youre leaving yourself open to losing a heck of a lot.

If the ATO are gonna charge you, then thats what theyll do, why pay extra

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

It's a curly one. The ATO has far reaching powers to withhold monies on behalf of itself and government departments. I think you may be able to avoid it by perhaps entering into a payment arrangement that's over three or four years, and then in two, pull out your super and then stop making payments? Sounds dodgy I know but I would have thought that if you are under a payment arrangement they wouldn't raid your super, especially if you whack it into an annuity so it never really gets into your hands?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...