Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, it has been cleaned now - it had to be, he came out of hospital at the end of December, and Friend has secured the services of a local cleaning company to come in once a week.  
    • Following the issue of a Liability Order the Council must obtain a warrant of control to try to collect the debt. If they fail their only option is to return the matter to court and you will be asked to attend.   At that hearing the court must be satisfied that:   • A liability order was imposed in relation to the debt. • You have failed to pay; and • The council tried to collect the sum using a warrant of control, and failed.   They must then go on to conduct a "means enquiry" into your financial circumstances. The principle aim of that is firstly to establish whether you had demonstrated either a wilful refusal to pay (i.e. you had sufficient funds but simply refused to pay) or "culpable neglect" (i.e. you had the funds but chose to spend them on something else). Only if they find one of those two can commitment to prison (either immediate or postponed) be considered. Also, only if they find one of those two can they order payments to meet the debt. The usual combination is an order to make payments coupled with a postponed commitment. But, the payment rate must be realistic in terms of your financial circumstances and it should normally mean that the debt is paid within three years. If a realistic payment rate will not see the debt paid in that period then the court should consider remitting (i.e. writing off) some or all of the debt. Similarly, if they find neither wilful refusal to pay nor culpable neglect (and by default find that you simply did not have the ability to pay) they should also consider remitting some or all of the debt.   You should note that at these commitment proceedings, as the matters you face could result in custody, you are entitled to have the services of the duty solicitor. In your circumstances I would say the chances of you being committed to prison are slightly less than zero. From your very brief description of your finances you simply have no spare money (though a means enquiry will delve more deeply into your affairs, especially the debts for which the DWP are making deductions from your benefits). There is no point in delaying any of this. The sooner it gets sorted the better as your circumstances seem unlikely to change any time soon. One thing you must bear in mind is that these proceedings will only deal with the debt covered by the Liability Order. If you have any Council Tax arrears that have accrued since then they will have to be dealt with separately. I'm also assuming you live in England. Since April 2019 commitment to prison has not been an option in Wales.    
    • good issued the default after you turned 50 when any payment is not longer required on the loans and they should be written off.   it's fast becoming clear that they solely refused your SLC forms as a mode of deferring to create this whole falsehood.   the case your refer to about the new forms is detailed in this form in many SLC erudio threads.   if you could go get a USB converter lead to make your old HDD drives readable from amazon or somewhere , cheap as chips and <£5.
    • Has the property been cleaned now? Is it the in the same state as before?
    • Please follow the link and read what we have to say about people who pay by bank transfer
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

International Debt Collectors! (Credit Limits International LTD) Court Claim received


Recommended Posts

Hi any advice would be much appreciated.

 

I got offered a job in Australia from the UK.

the deal was they paid for my visa upfront and when I got to Australia and started work I would pay them back out of my salary weekly.

I didn't even sign any contract regarding this.

 

I went to visit the company in Australia on a recce before I packed up my belongings and family consisting of 3 children all under 5.

When I got there the job wasn't the job that I was told and the manager was an idiot. 

 

When I returned home I emailed the company explaining I won't be taking the job offer or the visa.

They have told me I owe them £8500. 

 have ignored them as I didn't sign anything regarding paying this back. 

 

The Australian company have now passed on my details onto a debt collector in the UK called Credits Limits International (CLI) Is this not breaching GDPR?

They keep sending me letters that I keep ignoring, now I am on my final notice with interest adding each time?

 

Today 10/08/19 I have received a letter stating that as they haven't heard from me they are going to carry out a doorstep visit!!

 

Any of you advice would be much appreciated. 

 

Regards,

Ginni

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 157
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

which actually means..please pay us something as our kite is quickly falling out the sky as there is no wind blowing in this case and we will have to discontinue it to save more of our money by trying

smart cookie that judge...CLI you've been rumbled!!   i can see a discontinuance coming here.   dx  

Hi Ginni,   Glad to see you started the thread and have useful input.   If no contract signed between you and the potential employer, they and CLI have little or no chance of pursu

CLI are not proper debt collectors, as I don't think they have any FCA licence to conduct debt collection.

 

All CLI offer is a suite of letters, which creditors can use to chase debts. CLI simply post out the letters and pass on any monies received.

 

Safe to ignore them, as they cannot do anything. Any doorstep enquiry agents they probably won't be sending, have no powers. They simply ask if Miss Xxxx lives at the address and would they like to pay a debt.  You simply say nothing and close the door. They would not bother to return.

 

 If the Aussie company want to pursue this, they can instruct UK Solicitors to issue a UK Court claim, as you are resident in the UK. Before the alleged creditor can issue a UK Court claim, their UK Solicitors would need to send a letter to you, advising you they would issue a Court claim.

 

If you never agreed to any terms regarding the costs of the Visa, then there does not appear to be any basis to a Court claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi unclebulgaria,

 

Thanks for the response,

 

I will continue to ignore CLI, the only agreement I had with the company was that I would pay the money back when I started work and it would come out from my weekly salary. Obviously I never started work for the employer in Australia and I never signed any agreement regarding paying the visa money back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

plenty of threads here about the fleecers

 

moved you to the overseas forum

just type CLI in our search top right

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ginni,

 

Glad to see you started the thread and have useful input.

 

If no contract signed between you and the potential employer, they and CLI have little or no chance of pursuing any claim against you so safe to ignore for now.

 

However, I'd be inclined to write to CLI saying you require sight of any contract signed by you that confirms you owe anything to the alleged creditor. ........

 

...... and in the absence of such contract, you will pursue CLI for harassment.

 

But if others think totally ignoring CLI is the best course of action, do that !

 

😎

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see why someone might write asking to prove a contract existed, but I have a feeling that CLI will just pass on to the Aussie company.

 

It might then lead to letters being received including copies of emails, letters etc, where the Visa application, plus the costs of the application was being discussed and how the costs would be repaid.  

 

Although a written contract may not exist in one document, the communications about the Visa application costs and repayment, plus the OP's acceptance could be considered a contract.  As the OP does not reside in Australia, there is nothing stopping the Aussie company instructing UK Solicitors to issue a UK Court claim to attempt to recover the alleged debt.

 

It is whether the Aussie company are willing to incur a lot in legal costs and risk losing in Court.  The CLI process is a cheap way of trying to recover a debt, simply by paying costs of sending letters. If the CLI process does gain any response, the decision is with the Aussie company, whether they spend any more money to try to recover the alleged debt.  Replying at this stage might encourage the Aussie company to continue, by sending copies of communications which they will state do form a contract.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice unclebulgaria,

 

The thread of emails only states that I will pay the visa money once I start work and that it would come out of my weekly salary. How does that stand in court as I didn't start the job?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would be a question answered in a Court.

 

it would be difficult to argue that you had not agreed to repay the Visa costs . You would point to the fact that the Visa was subject to you actually starting work and repaying the Visa cost via a wage deduction. 

 

If there are no terms stated in any communications about repaying the Visa, if you did not start work, then I would think that the Aussie company would fail with any Court claim.  

 

I don't think you want to get into any communications through CLI. You could simply respond directly to the Aussie company, just confirming that you reside at the UK address and if they feel the need to communicate with you, that they can write to your UK address. Don't say anything else about Visa or work issues. The letter is simply confirming your UK address for any communications. This just records that you have confirmed your UK address and can receive correspondence at the address. That you are happy to receive their communications and are not ignoring them. You just don't get into any discussions regarding any alleged debt.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi unclebulgaria,

 

Thanks for this information and advice.

 

Maybe I will email the company stating what you have said, that way I haven't been ignoring them. Thanks again for the info and advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just give your uk address

and advise your email is not to be used for any further communications letter only and they will all be blocked

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

Just received another letter today from CLI stating that the client has instructed CLI to proceed through the courts in order to collect the debt unless I pay them within 7 days (even thought I haven't signed for this outstanding money and the agreement was I would pay it back once I started working for the company).

 

What are my next steps : /

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Await a court claim...see if it actually materialises. 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • slick132 locked and unlocked this topic

open

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

First if all, thanks to slick & dx100uk for reopening this thread. 

 

So CLI have been sending letters out consistently for over a year now but I have just been ignoring these threats and nothing has materialised just like you guys said originally when I posted on here. 

 

Yesterday I received a pack that states a claim form for the county court business centre? 🙄

 

I have attached an image of this pack.

 

I am not sure if it's legit as CLI have sent so much through the post saying they are coming to my door etc etc and nothing has actually materialised so just checking what my next steps are please guys.

Thanks in advance.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have removed image in last post as court claim number showing.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please read the linked to thread and provide the basic details of the Court claim received.

 

 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? CREDIT LIMITS INTERNATIONAL

 

Date of issue – 11 SEPTEMBER 2020 

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 

 

1.THE CLAIMANTS CLAIM IS FOR PROFESSIONAL CHARGES FOR A VISA APPLICATION CARRIED OUT BY THE FORMER CREDITOR DONGARA MARINE PTY LTD.

 

2.BY A DEED OF ASSIGNMENT DATED 21ST JULY 2020 THE CLAIM WAS ASSIGNED TO THE CLAIMANT

 

3.THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS INTEREST UNDER SECTION 69 OF THE COUNTY COURTS ACT 1984 AT THE RATE OF 8% A YEAR FROM 26/03/2019 TO 10/09/2020 ON £8,046.45 AND ALSO INTEREST AT THE SAME RATE UP TO THE DATE OF JUDGEMENT OR EARLIER PAYMENT AT A DAILY RATE OF £1.76.

 

What is the total value of the claim? £9398.21
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes think we received something through the post regarding a pre notice.
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? NO
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? NO
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? AFTER - BUT NOT AGREEMENT THIS WAS JUST EMAILS BETWEEN EACH OTHER.
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? VIA EMAIL - BUT THEY WAS NOTHING SIGNED ON MY BEHALF.
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? NO.
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. THE DEBT PURCHASER.
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? YES.
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I RECEIVED INVOICES VIA EMAIL FOR OUTSTANDING BALANCE.
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? JUST LETTERS FROM CLI STATING OUTSTANDING BALANCE THAT NEEDS TO BE PAID.

 

Why did you cease payments?I HAVE NEVER MADE PAYMENTS AND THE AGREEMENT VIA EMAIL WAS WHEN I STARTED WORK IN AUSTRALIA THAT I WOULD HAVE THE MONEY TAKEN STRAIGHT OUT OF MY WEEKLY SALARY. I HAVE NOT STARTED WORKING FOR THE COMPANY AND DIDN'T PURSUE THE VISA AS I WENT YO VISIT THE COMPANY AND THE JOB WASN'T WHAT IT WAS MADE UP TO BE.
 

What was the date of your last payment? NEVER PAID
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? YES I SUPPOSE SO AS THEY HAVE PASSED THIS ONTO CLI.
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? N/A
 

 

I hope this is all that is needed. I will now send a CCA request to CLI.

 

I am just filling in the CCA request and for the ref:

77 - Fixed Loans

78 - Credit Cards & Catalogues

79 - HP Agreements.

 

Mine are neither of these, any suggestions what to put here please?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it was not UK credit so will not be covered by the CCA

 

just send CPR to solicitors.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

interesting

 

on the fca register .... they are not..

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx100uk,

 

Thanks for your post, I haven't got a solicitor yet shall I approach one? And what is the CPR to send solicitor?

 

Also what is FCA? 🤣 Does this stand me in good stead if they are not on this?

 

Cheers!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

they must be registered with the financial conduct authority in the UK and hold an appropriate licence to carry out financial matters inc court.

 

are you SURE the claimant is stated as CLI on the claimform?

there should also be a solicitor who raised the claim listed on the claimform

 

thats who the CPR31:14 goes too ...which is the last one in the link posted earlier asking for details of the claim.

no you don't ever need a solicitor.

 

dx

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the total value of the claim? £9398.21

 

Australia Work Visa Costs

Skilled Regional (Provisional) visa (extended stay pathway) – 360 AUD (254 USD)
(£204.93) Temporary Work visas – 310 AUD (218 USD) (£176.47) except in limited circumstances. Distinguished Talent visa – 4,110 AUD (2,895 USD)(£2,239.60)21 Apr 2020

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Andyorch changed the title to International Debt Collectors! (Credit Limits International LTD) Court Claim received

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...