Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tesco/RBS/Shoosmiths response to a CCA request


Gator
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1541 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi 

 

have been asked to create a new thread by DX100uk for this old Tesco debt 

The original thread for reference is:  Best actions on old debts - help please

Details from my original thread are below:

Plus as requested both Tesco's and Shoosmiths CCA response documents are also uploaded for DX100uk to hopefully check?

 

Thanks as always for you help!

Best regards

Gator

 

Tesco/ RBS (Loan) £2,140

Was forwarded onto Shoosmiths Solicitors for administration

Not showing on my credit reports (am actively looking through old paperwork for a default notice)

 

NEW Update: 30th July 2019

Both Tesco’s dated 28/6/19 and Shoosmiths 15/7/19 has now replied with a copy of the original signed Credit Agreement CCA 1974.

With a request from Shoosmiths asking that I contact them and discuss how to arrange to pay what is owed?

The Tesco and Shoosmiths documents sent can be uploaded if required.

Help appreciated on what action, I should take? make a new thread scan up the CCA return to one PDF file read upload

Tesco_CCA_response_docs.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

had to remove the shoos upload ref No on page 2

 

seems all ok to me bar the lack of a complete set of T&C's but that's no big deal for the OC to provide

 

IMHO i'd resume your £5PCM payment directly to Tesco's now using your banks interweb banking portal 

or even up it some? as you've just about wiped out 90% of your historic debts now?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX100uk

 

Thanks for your quick reply

And apologies for me leaving a reference number on the Shoosmiths pdf upload, my fault, should have noticed!

As per resuming a payment to Tesco’s will look to arrange shortly…

 

. Just a few questions please:

 

You advised doing this directly with Tesco’s, but as Shoosmiths are the administrators that Tesco’s have assigned, should I not contact them instead?


And especially as Shoosmiths had been the last agency I had being paying £5pcm to through StepChange (DMP), prior to my cancellation of  the account with SC, as of June '19?

 

Also if I am contacting either Tesco’s or Shoosmiths, would you consider it and if it’s financially possible for me, a good idea that I propose a reduced full and final payment offer, to close the account once and for all?


Possibly thinking an offer somewhere between say 20-45% of the owed amount?

 

All help with a way forward is greatly appreciated

Best regards
Gator

Link to post
Share on other sites

where a debt is still owned by the original creditor you always cutout and ignore powerless middle men

they really have zero powers.

 

as fore F&F

no harm in trying.

relate to the years you've been paying £5PCM and that this is a one time offer .

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update on Tesco debt progress....

 

Hi

 

I sent a F&F offer of approximately 25% to Tesco on the 3rd Aug '19 and still have not had any reply  back from them as yet.

No contact was taken with Shoosmiths solicitors as advised, and  have had no response as yet from them also.

 

What, if anything should I do?

Plus should I now open a new thread for this debt?

 

All help appreciated as always

Best regards

 

Gator

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

let it run.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

NEW Update re Tesco debt

 

Hi I have recently had a letter dated the 28th January from Shoosmiths Solicitor’s and in the document attached, it stated the following:

We kindly advise that it is our client's instruction to reach a formal arrangement for the repayment of the outstanding balance. Our client has confirmed that it is willing to consider an offer of repayment in accordance with your circumstances.”

“Accordingly, to enable our client to review your proposals for repayment, we require the completion of an Income and Expenditure form, within the next 14 days.”

I had as previously mentioned in the earlier post #6 that I sent a F&F offer to pay 25% of debt to the Tesco Bank (Personal Finance), who are the owners of the debt, not Shoosmiths who state that Tesco’s is their client.


Unfortunately Tesco’s have not yet replied at all to my offer on the 3rd Aug 2019 of me paying them 25% of  the debt amount as a F&F settlement and so am asking, what is the best action for me to take?

 

1/           Not respond at all to Shoosmiths, as per advice earlier, as they are not the owners of the debt! And I also believe that they have not spoken to Tesco at all, so they don’t know of my F&F offer and this letter is just an attempt to get me to start paying a payment of say £5 etc, as was the case when I was previously with Stepchange?
(I think I already know your answers is no to me giving them any response, as your previous advice mentioned, due to them having no powers)

2/           Maybe Contact Tesco to offer them once again the 25% amount of debt, as a F&F payment?

 

3/           Or maybe something else?

 

Hopefully I can be given some advice, re what is best to do
Thanks
regards
Gator

ShoosmithsLtr.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

safe to ignore

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...