Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Jeweller fails to repair engagement ring and will not return ring


soke58
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1719 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello - We are dealing with a local Jeweller who does repairs.  I took my old engagement ring in as it had broke, paid over £150 to repair which he did.  A week later it broke in a weak spot created by the Jeweller.  So we took the ring back - that was over 2 months ago.  We are not dealing with the repairer because according to the member of staff he has been off sick and in hospital.  So we asked for the ring back not matter what condition.  They said they have a policy that says if it is not in the condition to give back then they do not give the property back until it has been corrected.  We have given up and just want our property back no matter what, we think they are having financial difficulty and are about to go out of business.  What are our rights?  The guy in the shop says he doesn't know where the ring is as the repairer has not got a good filing system.  Please advise.  thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may have to sue them in the tort of conversion. This will be quite simple but the only difficulty might be that you presumably want ringback rather than compensation.

Please can you tell us the name of the jeweller. You may be very right to be concerned. Are you able to find out the name of the repairer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would certainly contact the police – but on what you say, it doesn't count as theft and I can imagine that the police will try to say that it is a civil matter.. It will be helpful if you would a dress the questions I have put in my earlier post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no disadvantage to you if you name the parties involved. It may help to put pressure on them, it may protect others in the same boat, it may produce somebody else to give further information about them and it may allow us to do one or two checks on them.

It's a bit tiring to play cat and mouse here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Doesn't look too promising https://www.google.com/search?ei=HGxBXYX2BdeLjLsPmNymoAE&q=studio+55+biggleswade&oq=studio+55+biggleswade&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0.8812.12274..12667...0.0..0.61.625.12......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i22i30.ST8J_p_yLt4&ved=0ahUKEwiF9P6e-N7jAhXXBWMBHRiuCRQQ4dUDCAo&uact=5#lrd=0x4877cc3fcfbabd65:0x2ab063220286e692,1,,,

 

You say you know who the repairer is – is that correct? Is he part of the business or is he some independent contractor?

You say that you know that the business is in trouble. How do you know this?

What would you say is the value of the ring – actual value – and sentimental value to you? Would you be satisfied to have an award of damages rather than the return of the ring?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, it is my original engagement ring, the value is not much at all.  The reason I went to him was because about 3 years ago he put in saphire for me and I was happy with that.  The guy in the shop says the repairer is going through lots of difficulties in his life, the latest being he was beaten up.  Whilst I feel sorry for him - I just want my ring back, even if it is broken.  So far am down £150 - I would like that money back but I dont think that is going to happen, how would I get an award of damages?  I dont think they have any money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you can either sue for the return of the ring or you can sue for damages to the value of the ring. When assessing the value of the ring, you would be required to state the replacement value – but also if you are able to argue that the ring had a special meaning to then you would be able to put in a claim for that special value as well.

If they don't have any money – then presumably they still have the ring and if the ring is your original engagement ring then presumably it has a special value which would not easily be replaced simply by a money award.

You haven't told is whether the repairer is part of the business or acting independently. Also, if the repairer is in hospital – do you know where he is? I suppose it is possible that the whole thing could be sorted out by means of a nice little visit including some flowers and grapes to the hospital and to ask him where the ring is and if he can return it to you. It might be a good idea to try and avoid a legal conflict.

We can certainly advise you on bringing a claim in the County Court – but these things are never hugely straightforward.

Are you still on speaking terms with the jewellers and you think they might give you the details of the repairer? If you happen to know the repairer is named then if you are in a place where there is only one major hospital then maybe the repairer is there and you might be able to track down and visit

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to pursue the civil action route and you want a solicitor.

 

We had a similar problem some years ago. In the end I used the free legal cover on the house policy to commence civil proceeding for us, breach of bailment, contract etc.

They had lost the item and we secured an instalment payment for the value. I know it does not cover the sentimental value but worth examining your policy.,

 

Some times all you need is a solicitors letter.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

We understand that the business is in trouble but we don't know to what extent it is in trouble. If the business is on the verge of folding then going through a solicitor et cetera will be far too time-consuming.

The action you would need to bring in any event would be for the tort of conversion if you want the ring back

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, I think you are using the wrong sol. With respect, mine took 20 minutes, did it whilst I was there about £15 if I  remember right.

Not convertion surely , I wont post the definitions up, they are all over, You would require intent.

 

Bailment just means that goods were taken by consent (held in posesion)but not returned, whatever the reason.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are at risk of losing ring and money.

If they are going out of business you need to move very quickly. 

Go to the shop, do not move from the counter and demand your ring back.

Let them call the police if they want, or call them yourself. 

When they show up they will try to tell you that it's a civil matter, it's not.

Tell them that they have told you they're going out of business and holding on to all jewellery.

Also tell them the ring is in the shop.

Hopefully the police will take this seriously and the ring will magically be found.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is a good move, sadly hate confrontation - it seems so unnecessary.  They haven't actually said they are going out of business.  But we have the documentation from companies house.  eeeekkk - thanks everyone 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would end up getting yourself arrested for BOTP anyway. I know flippin barmy isn't it?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

What breach of the peace?

Op don't cause a riot.

Just stand your ground and politely, firmly and relentlessly demand your ring back.

At third refusal call police and show documentation that they're going out of business. 

Also insist on the fact that they want to keep jewellery because once the ltd company folds, nobody would be responsible. 

That is theft or fraud, a good police officer would find the best fit, and a better one will talk the guy into giving you back the ring.

No shouting,  no hitting, just assert your right to your property.

Another way would be available and much more effective,  but we're not allowed to suggest it on an open forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and when the proprietor asks you"politely" to leave?

 

Its not fraud.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is fraud or theft, read the acts and fit the bill as police should do instead of claiming "civil matter".

By your interpretation I can open a jewellery repair shop on a ltd company,  take as many jewels as possible and than close down and it would be perfectly legal.

No my dear, it's not. 

The ring belongs to the op and must be returned. 

From the theft act: 

Basic definition of theft.

(1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it

 

From the fraud act:

Fraud by false representation

(1)A person is in breach of this section if he—

(a)dishonestly makes a false representation, and

(b)intends, by making the representation—

(i)to make a gain for himself or another, or

(ii)to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.

(2)A representation is false if—

(a)it is untrue or misleading, and

(b)the person making it knows that it is, or might be, untrue or misleading.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to update you all, using the post earlier that sent us to a link to companies house page  - about the owner.  My husband sent a text message to the guy who works in the shop, who is sadly fending everyone off, quoting the owners name and address as posted on companies house page.  Saying that we would be taking appropriate action "tort of conversion" through a solicitor.  Who should phone today but the Jeweller himself to say that my ring has been sent to London for a certain procedure (not relevant to this post) and that we should have the ring back next friday.  We will delay action until then.  Many thanks all for your posts.  This forum has been most helpful and I really appreciate it.  Watch this space.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet they didnt say were in London.

try looking up a company called LSJ, ( laser surgery for jewellery) they are based in 43 Kirby St, Hatton Garden and do most of the trade laser build up, etc and woud be able to at least tell you whether they have anything belonging to Studio 55 or RL associates or any named individual and then you can get them to hold on to the ring rather than return it to the individual or shop until you sort out the return directly to yourself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...