Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof? 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No    Have you had a response?  n/a 7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice'  
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
    • Evening all,   So today, I was sent an updated offer that includes the £12.60 I spent on letters, but they have declined to add the interest at £7.40. They have stating 'We acknowledge your request to claim interest to date, however, this would be at the discretion of a trial judge if the claim did proceed to a trial hearing.' I think I am content with this outcome, and pushing this to a trial for a total interest of £15.30 throughout the claim does not make sense to me.   What are people's thoughts? I am sure our courts have better things to concentrate on?
    • FFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdfFFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdf 2pages T&C,s UCM
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lowell claimform - vodafone mobile debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1649 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have received a claim issued by Lowells for a Vodafone and was wondering if I could maybe get a couple of questions answered.

 

I have had great help before from here so know the usual protocol to deal with claims but as this is a mobile contract I am not sure if its the same procedure.  I have found one other thread on here but I am a little confused.

 

I know that mobile phone contracts are not regulated but I read somewhere that if they are providing a phone then it partly becomes regulated.  Is this the case?

 

I know that I should send a CPR 31.14 request but do I bother sending a CCA?  I would really appreciate a pointer in the right direction.

 

What is the claim for –

 

1)The Defendant entered into an agreement with vodafone under account ref 7******** (the Agreement)

2)The defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated.

3)The Agreement was later assigned to the Claimant on 00/02/2018 and notice given to the defendant.

4)Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £400 remains due and outstanding.

and the Claimant claims

a)The said sum of £400

b)Interest pursuant to "69 county Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.093, but limited to one year, being £34

c)costs.

 

What is the total value of the claim?    540.00

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC ( Pre Action Protocol) ?  No

 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No

 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  N/A


Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?  Yes

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  After

 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?  Online

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/ Equifax /Etc...) ?  Will check

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  Assigned

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments? Unemployment

 

What was the date of your last payment?  2016

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No

 

Thank you

LTB

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The T&Cs would signify if there was a partial credit agreement in supplying the handset...but even if there was its really irrelevant to defending the claim as it would be a split agreement.

 

Simply send the CPR 31.14 only.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

can we have the POC please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry dx100uk, it would help wouldnt it!

POC:

 

1)The Defendant entered into an agreement with vodafone under account ref 7******** (the Agreement)

2)The defendant failed to maintain the required paymens and the service was terminated.

3)The Agreement was later assigned to the Claimant on 00/02/2018 and notice given to the defendant.

4)Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £400 remains due and outstanding.

and the Claimant claims

a)The said sum of £400

b)Interest pursuant to "69 county Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.093, but limited to one year, being £34

c)costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol:

 

so a std Lowell mobile claimform. lots of like threads here already 

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked.
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.
.
 get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/
.
type your name ONLY

no need to sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to lowell claimform - vodafone mobile debt
  • 3 weeks later...

I sent CPR31.14 request but have had nothing back.

 

Defence is due in by Friday and I would appreciate if you folks could have a look at the following and see if its ok to file.

 

Many thanks

 

Particulars of Claim

1) The Defendant entered into an agreement with Vodafone under account reference 0000000000 ('the agreement').

2) The Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was cancelled.

3) The agreement was later assigned to the claimant on **/**/**** and notice given to the defendant.

4) Despite repeated requests for payment the sum of ****.** remains due and outstanding.

And the Claimant claims

a) The said sum of ****.**

b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of 0.093 but limited to one year being

c) Costs

 

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

Furthermore the Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

 

 1. Paragraph 1 is accepted.I may of had in the a contractual relationship with Vodafone, however I do not recall the exact details or recall any outstanding balance and have requested that the claimant verify the exact details of this claim by way of a CPR 31.14 request. The claimant has yet to comply.

 

2. Paragraph 2 is noted but again I do not recall the agreement or any breach unless the claimant can clarify its claim. 

 

3. Paragraph 3 is denied.I have never received a Notice of Assignment pursuant to sec136 of the Law of Property Act 1925.

 

And therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:-

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into a Agreement/Contract; and

(b) show and disclose evidence of the nature of breach and quantify any debt outstanding.

(c) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

4. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act.

 

5. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

6. And Pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules Practice Direction 16 (7.3) Where a claim is based upon a  written agreement:

 

   (1) a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be disclosed  and the original(s) should be available at any hearing.

          The Claimant refers to an Agreement within its particulars.

 

7. Notwithstanding the above should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the entire balance of the remaining contract, OFCOM guidance states that any Early Termination Charge that is made up of the entire balance of the remaining contract is unlikely to be fair as it fails to take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service.An Unfair Term and Condition governed by the Unfair terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (UTCCRs).

 

8. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Almost spot on LTB

 

I have tweaked your 1 slightly...you may of had a contractual relationship in the past.

I have added after your intro re Pre Action Protocol....as you stated you never received a pack.

I have added you a new point 3 as you failed to refute the Notice of Assignment.

 

And Finally I have added you a new point 6.

 

All addition marked in Blue  

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

what date is top right on the claimform please?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not due till Monday 4pm but upto you harms nothing in this case

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Get reading Lowell claimform threads..self help

 

Like..

See last few posts

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You copy and fill the n180 out and royal mail them out.

You should be reading up between the stages so you know whats next and what to do during the claim stages.

CAG is self help too!!

 

Just about any claimform thread covers this

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

An Update:

 

I sent the N180 in time to the court and to the Solicitors. 

 

I also ticked no to the mediation. The reason I did this was because it asked if I had all the documentation I needed to enter into mediation.  I said no because Lowells had not replied to my CPR request. I sent a covering letter to Lowells Solicitors explaining this and they have responded with a letter and copies of the statements from Vodafone and supposed copies of the letters of assign.

 

In brief the letter says that they are not providing a copy of the agreement because it is unregulated and there is no legal requirement for Vodafone to retain a copy and they couldnt get one anyway because Lowells does not have access to a copy as it was not provided by Vodafone.

 

It also says that they have included a reconstitued copy of the letter of assignment and statements as requested (I assume my CPR request).  They also confirm the balance when it was assigned, the interest they added when they issued the claim and of course the court costs etc.

 

They also say that they will proceed with the claim but they are keen to resolve it without further legal action.

 

I guess I now have they option to either pay it or wait for the court hearing date.  Not sure where to go from here.

 

I am well aware that this site is a self help tool and I have read lots but unfortunately I dont really understand a lot of it and thats why I appreciate any comments and help.

 

Thanks in advance

 

LTB

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you ideally should have said yes to mediation

thus entering into the spirit of the process giving them time until the actual telephone mediation takes place.

 

looks like you have the std reply lowells post out in all mobile/telecom claims.

I bet the statements are not even marked as from coming from voda but lowells dent management database.

and ofcourse pointing out most of the debt was unpaid/unused months till end of contract that was already disconnected.

 

await the n157 from your assigned court.

 

I can see them discontinuing this claim

as with most Lowell telecom claims here.

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...