Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot/Restons Claimform - old New day Marbles card - - Ap to lift stay/SJ - NO DN only dbase SShot ***Claim Disc'd SJ thrown out***


tomtom013
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1655 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My wife received a court claim regarding an outstanding credit card debt with Marbles.The court claim was initiated by Restons on behalf of Marbles on 03/2018. My wife put in her defence shortly after and Restons failed to respond in the allocated time.

 

Restons then followed up with information that she requested in her defence and has subsequently requested settlement and asking her to withdraw her defence on 2-3 occasions. 

 

On Friday she received a letter from Restons stating they have served an application notice with supporting evidence and are seeking judgement without a hearing.

 

In a nutshell.

Failing this they are requesting

1) To lift the stay on proceedings

2) Strike out her defence

3) Alterative to the above, an order of summary judgement.

4) Defendant pays claimants costs

 

Can anyone please give advice on the best route for my wife to take.

Thank you in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

standard practice for reston on stayed claims.

n244 threats to lift the stay and strike out going for a SJ I expect?

 

you sure the claimant was marbles? they don't exist anymore themselves?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant see any existing thread on this so we have no history......to enable advice.

 

Please read the following and copy the Q,s and your responses back here please.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/357877-you-have-received-a-claim-what-you-need-to-do-updated-jan-2019/

 

We will also need a copy of the defence submitted.

 

Thread title amended

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

as they do

but UNTIL the cOURT writes its just a std threat from them we've seen 100's of time here before

the debt might be a marbles card on but I bet bottom dollar its a DCA not marbles that are the claimant

can you answer andyorch's questions above please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Court Claim / Marbles /Restons application to lift stay and SJ

Hi Andy,

 

Thank you in advance for any help that you can offer! Here are the answers to the questions:

 

Name of the Claimant ? - Cabot Financial (UK) Limited. (The original debt is with New- Day Marbles credit card,)

 

Date of issue – 5th March 2018

 

Particulars of Claim

 

The Claimant claims payment of the overdue balance due from the Defendant(s) under a contract between the Defendant(s) and New Day dated on or about Jun 22 2015 and assigned to the Claimant on Oct 05 2017

 

What is the total value of the claim?

 

Default Balance - £2003.26

Court fee - £105

Legal representative's costs - £80

Total amount - £2188.26

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC ( Pre Action Protocol) ? I received letters saying they could take court action 

 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No, same address

 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/a


Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit card

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After April 2007 - 2015

 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online 

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/ Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. - The claim was issued by Cabot Financial, the debt purchaser who the account was assigned to.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Yes I was aware

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I can not remember receiving a default notice (however Restons have sent me a 'screen shot' stating that one was sent). 

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? I received a notice of sums in arrears on 7.8.17, the year after this, it had gone through the court already.

 

Why did you cease payments? Financial hardship plus illness - diagnosed with anxiety and I had just had a baby. Not an excuse I know!

 

What was the date of your last payment? 2 Feb 2017

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No

 

This is a copy of my defence:

 

I am defending this claim for the following reasons.

1. I am unable to admit liability as I have not seen any proof
that this is my debt, including an original final credit
agreement. I therefore, politely request a copy of the CCA
pursuant to s.78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

2. I can not recall having received any default notices from any
organisation, under Sec 87 of the CCA 1974. I need to see evidence
of these default notices also under Sec 87 of the CCA 1974.

 

the recent correspondence restons have sent me with their witness statement states that they have delayed their defence due to collecting more evidence.

 

They have sent me this evidence however it is exactly the same as what they sent me in January 2019.  

 

In addition, the witness statement explains that a screenshot from the original creditor evidencing that a default notice was issued on 26 th april 2017.

 

However, they have not sent me a copy of said default notice - they have included lots of statements though. 

 

Thanks, Amy

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Cabot/Restons Claimform - old New day Marbles card - - now Restons lift/SJ Threat

can we have the FULL POC as from the claimform please.

 

and scan up restons WS inc all the exhibits [don't need statements]

to one PDF file

read upload

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

That is the full POC on the claim form:

 

The claimant claims payment of the overdue balance due from the defendant(s) under a contract between the defendant(s) and New Day dated on or about Jun 22 2015 and assigned to the claimant on Oct 05 2017

 

PARTICULARS a/c...…...

Date                   Item                              Value

26/01/2018      Default balance           2003.26

                            Post Refrl Cr                NIL

                        

                            Total                              2003.96

 

The Restons WS is 105 pages long including letters etc.  There are a lot of marbles statements in there plus letters from marbles, cabot and restons.  Are you wanting them all minus the statements from marbles?  Can I screen shot them and upload them?

 

Thank you 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

use a scanner please <£25 nowa days.

we dont need statement.

but need their full WS + exhibits

 

thats a really brief poc.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Cabot/Restons Claimform - old New day Marbles card - - Application to lift stay/Summary Judgment

had to hide that 

pers info on page one not checked the rest yet looking

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

claim number not redacted throughtout pages

other refs no's showing

 

point 7 address showing twice

 

all cabot letter sdhave ref no.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is rather a lot to redact else id do it

using bits of paper is not really the way.

leave it there no-one bar you and siteteam can see it.

see what andyorch says.

 

but a couple of things pricked my eyes.

they want a paper only hearing.  you must object 

a lot to me seems like hearsay evidence esp as they make pains to ref phonecalls and internal databases not original information from the OC.

also those court cases they use as presendence.. I don't think apply here. 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont need to object...the court will insist on a hearing anyway...just Restons trying it on on the cheap...as with every other thread they are always denied.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the court should advise you of a hearing date...but dont sit too tight you now need to draft a statement in response and objection to their statement as to why the stay and Summary Judgment should be denied.This must be filed/served not less than 7 days pre hearing date.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends you may get a hearing in 3 months or in two weeks...depends how fast you can draft a response.Yes once you have a date you must file and serve...file and serve meand file with court and serve a copy on the solicitor....but only 7 days before the hearing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

One other thing. Is it resonable to request the court to stirke out the claim on the grounds of Restons not offering anything new from when the cliam was stayed due to them not responding to my defence in time and on continuing to waste court time. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really because they have provided all their disclosures with their application now......concentrate on opposing their application and discrediting their evidence before asking to strike out the claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,

 

Hope i am ok to ask another question? Do I send this reponse now, while im awaiting correspondence from the court or do I wait until I hear from the court?

 

Many thanks for your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

re post 21

got a date yet?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...