Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Arrows/Watch Portfolio/ TTI SPC. EGG loan Debt - wont accept PO


Stagparty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1732 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I've received a letter today saying that Egg are assigning the loan account I have with them to Britannica Recoveries to be serviced by Arrow Global and the transfer is to take place in about 10 days time.

 

To date I have been making regular token payments to Egg and have not missed a payment.

 

My original agreement appears to be a Multiple Part Agreement with both the Loan Principal and PPI payment covered by just one set of terms and conditions rather than one for each separate part of the agreement. I think this could be a s18 agreement

 

I have tried reading the forums but have to confess to be being rather confused as to how the judgement in "Heath" might affect me.

 

Could someone please advise me and also suggest if it would be worthwhile or not writing to Egg to put the account into dispute. If the account is in dispute am I right in thinking that the account should not be transferred to Arrow?

 

Many thanks in advance from a very confused Cagger!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you could put the account into dispute to buy a little time.

The account can be sold or assigned to a debt purchase company

or a debt collection agency of their choice, you will see a section on

this in the agreement.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for the quick response.

 

I think the bit whereby I am getting confused is that if the agreement is improperly executed (as it is a multiple part agreement) then do Egg have the right to transfer the debt to anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post up the agreement after removing personal details and any bar codes leave in dates and amounts?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi stagparty it's a bit small but just readable I'm going to bump this so

others get a look and advise as I'm not to sure about the two part

agreement so don't want to give the wrong advice.

BUMP

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 years later...

Hi 

 

I have a debt which has recently been transferred to Watch Portfolio to administer on behalf of TTI SPC. 

The original debt was with Egg for a loan.

I think I received a Notice of Assignment years ago from Arrow Global but I might be mistaken but I don’t recall anything telling me it was assigned to TTI SPC.

 

Watch Portfolio have accepted my offer of token payments but will not accept payment by Postal Order. However they will accept a cheque or BACS payment.

All my other depts are paid by postal order each month.

My mental health is not good and the routine of sending a postal order works for me.

 

As far as I am aware postal orders are cashed at a bank in the same way a cheque is so I am unsure why postal orders aren’t accepted by Watch.

 

Can they legitimately refuse to accept postal orders?

 

Many thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to them with a formal letter of complaint and tell them that you want the complaint escalated to the financial ombudsman.

Include the postal order in the letter of complaint.

Every month send them the postal order again plus the one for the next month.

They are entrenched in their own systems and you need to give them a little bit of a hand to leverage them out

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't see any reason why they should refuse or why they would be allowed to refuse. Put it to the ombudsman to get a more authoritative decision. Frankly I doubt whether it will go to the ombudsman – I would expect they will put their hands up instead of making trouble for a silly point of principle

Link to post
Share on other sites

look up mitigation of debt before you contact them again.

By refusing the payment they may well  have decided they dont want the money and  the debt is settled as far as they are concerned and the courts will accept that as being true by their actions.

Basically they have disabled themselves from performing their side of an agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread title amended 

 

why are you blindly paying these people anyway?

 

how old is this debt?

have you ever sebt them a CCA request to prove they hold the legally enforceable paperwork to even demand money from you??

 

same for any other debt you are blindly paying too!!

 

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to arrows/Watch Portfolio/ TTI SPC. EGG loan Debt - wont accept PO
  • AndyOrch changed the title to Arrows/Watch Portfolio/ TTI SPC. EGG loan Debt - wont accept PO

that was 8yrs ago!!

and going by the posts ive found and merged here above

it wasn't deemed enforceable.

you should have comeback here when it was sold on too

 

 

send a new CCA request to arrows

stop paying now 

you are being cash cowed blind.

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...