Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for that "read me", It's a lot to digest, lots of legal procedure. There was one thing that I was going to mention to you,  but in one of the conversations in that thread it was mentioned that there may be spies on the Forum,  this is something that I've read quite some time ago in a previous thread. What I had in mind was to wait for the thirty days after their reply to my CCA request and then send the unenforceable letter. I was hoping that an absence of signature could be the Silver Bullet but it seems that there are lot of layers to peel on this Onion.  
    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
    • Paragraph 23 – "standard industry practice" – put this in bold type. They are stupid to rely on this and we might as well carry on emphasising how stupid they are. I wonder why they could even have begun to think some kind of compelling argument – "the other boys do it so I do it as well…" Same with paragraph 26   Paragraph 45 – The Defendants have so far been unable to produce any judgements at any level which disagree with the three judgements…  …court, but I would respectfully request…   Just the few amendments above – and I think it's fine. I think you should stick to the format that you are using. This has been used lots of times and has even been applauded by judges for being meticulous and clear. You aren't a professional. Nobody is expecting professional standards and although it's important that you understand exactly what you are doing – you don't really want to come over to the judge that you have done this kind of thing before. As a litigant in person you get a certain licence/leeway from judges and that is helpful to you – especially if you are facing a professional advocate. The way this is laid out is far clearer than the mess that you will get from EVRi. Quite frankly they undermine their own credibility by trying to say that they should win simply because it is "standard industry practice". It wouldn't at all surprise me if EVRi make you a last moment offer of the entire value of your claim partly to avoid judgement and also partly to avoid the embarrassment of having this kind of rubbish exposed in court. If they do happen to do that, then you should make sure that they pay everything. If they suddenly make you an out-of-court offer and this means that they are worried that they are going to lose and so you must make sure that you get every penny – interest, costs – everything you claimed. Finally, if they do make you an out-of-court offer they will try to sign you up to a confidentiality agreement. The answer to that is absolutely – No. It's not part of the claim and if they want to settle then they settle the claim as it stands and don't try add anything on. If they want confidentiality then that will cost an extra £1000. If they don't like it then they can go do the other thing. Once you have made the amendments suggested above – it should be the final version. court,. I don't think we are going to make any more changes. Your next job good to make sure that you are completely familiar with it all. That you understand the arguments. Have you made a court familiarisation visit?
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote... as has already been said, they use their own criteria. if a person is not stated as linked to you on your file then no cant hurt you. not all creditors use every CRA provider, there are only 3 main credit file providers mind, the rest are just 3rd party data sharers. if you already have revolving credit on your file there is no need to apply for anything just 'because' you need to show you can handle money. if you have bank account(s) and a mortgage which you are servicing (paying) then nothing more can improve your score, despite what these 'scam' sites claiml  its all a CON!!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PCN received - unclear "no stopping" times - ** CANCELLED BY COUNCIL **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1694 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received a PCN from Oldham City Council for parking in a zone that says "No stopping 10 - 5 am except taxis". Please see attached photo.

 

I interpreted this as "No stopping between the hours of 10 pm to 5 am", because that made sense to me at the time. 

I parked here from about 7 pm to 9:30 pm, and when I got back, the PCN was waiting for me.

 

I am thinking of challenging this on the grounds that the sign is ambiguous and open to interpretation. 

Every "no stopping" sign I've seen has "am" or "pm" written beside the hours, making it crystal clear and leaving no room for misunderstanding.

 

I've appealed to the council at the email address specified on the PCN, but my appeal was rejected today.

If this goes to court,  what do you think are my chances are of winning?

 

Thanks in advance for your replies. :)

IMG_8748.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read the sign as being the only time when stopping is permitted, (other than taxis) is between 5 am and 10 am, but the second sign tells me that the stopping is for loading only during that time. In other words, private vehicles are not permitted to stop at any time!

 

With regard to your further comment about court, parking was decriminalised several years ago, so court is not involved.

 

Your appeal that has been rejected is known as a 'soft appeal'. If you do not pay now - it should still be at the reduced rate - it could go to a formal appeal, after which the step is for the council to apply for an order which can be enforced by bailiffs.

 

Quite honestly I cannot see how you can avoid paying the penalty charge notice. If you are still within the period of discount following the soft appeal, that would be the best outcome. 

 

Jamberson and Michael Brown are the two most experienced Caggers on this subject, so you might want to wait for their observations.

  • Thanks 1

My time as a Police Officer and subsequently time working within the Motor Trade gives me certain insights into the problems that consumers may encounter.

I have no legal qualifications.

If you have found my post helpful, please enhance my reputation by clicking on the Heart. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Gick said:

I read the sign as being the only time when stopping is permitted, (other than taxis) is between 5 am and 10 am, but the second sign tells me that the stopping is for loading only during that time.

 

Hi Gick, thanks for the reply. I didn’t read the two signs in conjunction like that. I read them as two separate notices:

”No stopping except taxis between these times. Oh, and by the way, loading is only permitted between these here times.”

 

The problem is not the £35 fine itself, but the feeling that I’m being held responsible for misinterpreting a sign that could have been written more clearly, with no room for interpretation had they put “am” at the end of the “10”, like other signs. 

Edited by Zettai Baka
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree the sign is ambiguous, and I think you will probably win this, if you fight it all the way. (That's 'probably'!)

 

The sign must state the hours of no parking, and must be clear. So, the yellow sign says "No stopping 10 - 5am". Logically, that can't be 10am - 5am. So it must be 10pm - 5am. And then logically, it follows on, that you can stop to load after 5am, until 10am. If it means something other than that, it isn't clear.

 

I don't read any restriction after 10am - which is itself odd, but you have 14 days to decide what to do, so I would start by contacting the Council and asking for a copy of the Parking Order for that location. This will tell you what the true restriction is, and I would not be surprised if it's 10am - 5pm - in which case, the sign is completely faulty and you should win.

 

In any case, you can make formal representations once the Notice to Owner is issued, and this can be followed by adjudication.

 

Incidentally, what was the contravention and contravention code printed on the PCN?

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jamberson said:

 

The sign must state the hours of no parking, and must be clear. So, the yellow sign says "No stopping 10 - 5am". Logically, that can't be 10am - 5am. So it must be 10pm - 5am. And then logically, it follows on, that you can stop to load after 5am, until 10am. If it means something other than that, it isn't clear.

On that basis, there is no restriction at all between 10am and 10pm, which on a taxi/loading bay is highly unlikely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jamberson said:

I agree the sign is ambiguous, and I think you will probably win this, if you fight it all the way. (That's 'probably'!)

 

The sign must state the hours of no parking, and must be clear. So, the yellow sign says "No stopping 10 - 5am". Logically, that can't be 10am - 5am. So it must be 10pm - 5am. And then logically, it follows on, that you can stop to load after 5am, until 10am. If it means something other than that, it isn't clear.

 

 

Hi Jamberson, thanks for the thorough reply. That's encouraging :)

 

The reply to my appeal from Oldham Council says that the sign means 10 am to 5 am. I've attached screenshots of the email response from Oldham Council.

 

To me, even if that "am" was present in the sign, "10 am to 5 am" is an awkward way of counting time.

 

2 hours ago, Jamberson said:

 

I don't read any restriction after 10am - which is itself odd, but you have 14 days to decide what to do, so I would start by contacting the Council and asking for a copy of the Parking Order for that location. This will tell you what the true restriction is, and I would not be surprised if it's 10am - 5pm - in which case, the sign is completely faulty and you should win.

 

The response from the council (attached) says that it is 10am - 5am, which again to me is an awkward way of wording time. To consider the opposing argument, I suppose it sort of makes sense if you read the sign the way Gick described it in his post, but if the sign clearly said "10 am" instead of just "10" it would be blatantly obvious to anyone. Do you think I should still ask for a copy of the Parking Order anyway?

 

2 hours ago, Jamberson said:

Incidentally, what was the contravention and contravention code printed on the PCN?

 

Contravention Code: 45

Contravention: Stopped on a taxi rank.

Council response to appeal - part 1.jpg

Council response to appeal - part 2.jpg

Edited by Zettai Baka
Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting that in their reply the council admit the sign says 10-5am and then go on to say that this means 10am-5am.  If that's the case, why doesn't the sign make that clear.

 

I think this gives you a fair bit of wriggle room at adjudication, that the sign is wide open to mis-interpretation and the council have as good as admitted that.

 

The sign should have said 'No stopping 10am-midnight and midnight -5am except taxis'

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Michael Browne said:

Interesting that in their reply the council admit the sign says 10-5am and then go on to say that this means 10am-5am.  If that's the case, why doesn't the sign make that clear.

 

I think this gives you a fair bit of wriggle room at adjudication, that the sign is wide open to mis-interpretation and the council have as good as admitted that.

 

 

 

If you read that in conjunction with the next line, it's like they're saying "When I say 10, I obviously mean 10 am, duh." It makes me not want to pay them a single penny.

 

I did a Google search for "no stopping signs UK" and I could not find a single sign that does not clearly specify am/pm in both of the times. If I end up going to adjudication, I think I'll just print out 10 different "no stopping" signs and say "Look, these are no stopping signs put up by other councils and they leave absolutely no room for interpretation. Why can't you guys do the same thing?"

Edited by Zettai Baka
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go all the way to adjudication. 

Their explanation that 10 means 10am is very weak: how is someone supposed to know if you don't write it down.

24 minutes ago, Michael Browne said:

The sign should have said 'No stopping 10am-midnight and midnight -5am except taxis'

This is exactly right.

 

As the council has not bothered to specify am or pm, i read the first sign as "no stopping 10pm-5am except taxis" and the second sign as "loading only 5am-10am".

Prove me wrong i would say to these cowboys.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, king12345 said:

I would go all the way to adjudication. 

Their explanation that 10 means 10am is very weak: how is someone supposed to know if you don't write it down.

 

Thanks for the reply. I wouldn't be surprised if they reply with something like "Well it's just common sense that 10 means 10am because that's how taxis work, and you should know how taxis work, blah blah." 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think so.

They can say whatever they want,  but if they don't specify, any motorist can interpret the sign wrongly and park during restricted hours without knowing it.

Am or pm must be specified.

 

59 minutes ago, Michael Browne said:

The sign should have said 'No stopping 10am-midnight and midnight -5am except taxis'

 

This is the best comment.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Councils have a duty to ensure that the motorist is fully informed of the relevant traffic restrictions. The signs must operate in such a way as to provide reasonable information for the motorist concerning what is required in order to park lawfully, rather than the motorist having to guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zettai,

If you decide to take this further, rather than pay the discount, wait for the Notice to Owner..

 

Then post up your appeal here before submitting.

 

Bear in mind that you would almost certainly have to go to adjudication and although I think you have a good chance,  nothing's guaranteed and it's your money you're risking, not mine.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice Michael. After the sanity check from you and other people who replied, I've decided to not pay this silly fine. I'll wait for the Notice to Owner, and then post up an appeal here. 

 

I've never been to court or an adjudication, so in my head I'm thinking judges with wigs, a jury and a prosecution like in the movies, but I'm guessing it won't be that dramatic...?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Zettai Baka said:

 

I've never been to court or an adjudication, so in my head I'm thinking judges with wigs, a jury and a prosecution like in the movies, but I'm guessing it won't be that dramatic...?

No,  your appeal would be heard by the Traffic Penalty Tribunal either on-line or as a telephone hearing

https://www.trafficpenaltytribunal.gov.uk/how-your-appeal-will-be-decided/

 

https://www.trafficpenaltytribunal.gov.uk/what-to-expect-at-a-hearing/

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again, Michael.

 

The funny thing is, the car I was driving at the time belongs to the manager of the dealership where my own car was being repaired. They didn't have a courtesy car with automatic transmission like I requested, so they gave me the dealership manager's personal vehicle. Brand spanking new vehicle with a couple of hundred miles. I put a couple of hundred more on it, and now the manager is going to get a Notice to Owner in the post. He's going to love me.

Edited by Zettai Baka
Link to post
Share on other sites

That complicates matters.  Did you sign any form of courtesy car agreement?

 

As driver you cannot make representations to the NtO, only the registered keeper can do that.

 

The garage has to transfer liability to you by filling in the appropiate sction on the NtO and return it to the council, who will then issue an NtO in your name.

 

It would be best if you speak to the manager and explain, because otherwise the garage may well just pay the full penalty and bill you together with an admin charge. If that happens any right to appael is lost

Edited by Michael Browne
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the warning, Michael. I did have to sign a courtesy car agreement, but I don’t have a copy of it. I just contacted the dealership and asked the manager not to pay the fine if he ever receives anything related to this PCN. 

 

I’ve never seen a Notice to Order, but is that section regarding the transfer of liability clearly marked? If so, I’m hoping the manager will notice it, fill it in and transfer the liability to me without requiring prior knowledge of what you just said. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, on the NtO there is a tick box which says: 
 

Quote

 

We  are a hire and the vehicle in question was at the material time hired from the firm under a hiring agreement; and the person hiring it had signed a statement acknowledging liability in respect of any pnalty charge  involving the vehicle during the period of the hiring agreement.

You must include a statement of the name and address of the person to whom the vehicle was hired at the material time. Please also supply a copy of the hire agreement and the hirer's statement acknowledging their liability

 

 

The council is unlikely to send the NtO before the middle of August, so I would call the garage every 10 days after that   or so to make sure they deal with it

Edited by Michael Browne
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The owner of the car will have to make the transfer of liability - you should check with them now that they are in agreement with this - otherwise, you may have to pay it in full. It means them ticking a box on the back of the Notice to Owner and filling in your name and address. Then a new Notice to Owner gets sent out to you instead by the Council, and you're in business.

 

If you are fighting on, contact the council now and ask for a copy of the traffic order for that location. I would want to see the hours on the sign match what's written in the order, because it looks odd.

 

Adjudication hearings aren't scary. You will sit at a table with someone from the council, and the adjudicator (who isn't a judge - he or she will just be in business dress) will ask questions to understand the issue and then decide who they think is correct. It could be a bit of fun if you look at it that way. Nothing to be intimidated by - worst possible outcome, you have to pay the PCN. The council don't like the hearings as they can affect many other PCNs they are processing (eg, all the ones they are continuing to issue right at that spot) and they will be more obedient and deferential than you need to be!

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jamberson said:

Adjudication hearings aren't scary. You will sit at a table with someone from the council, and the adjudicator (who isn't a judge - he or she will just be in business dress) will ask questions to understand the issue and then decide who they think is correct. It could be a bit of fun if you look at it that way. Nothing to be intimidated by - worst possible outcome, you have to pay the PCN. The council don't like the hearings as they can affect many other PCNs they are processing (eg, all the ones they are continuing to issue right at that spot) and they will be more obedient and deferential than you need to be!

 

 

This is Oldham so the appeal will be at TPT and most likely be on-line/postal or a telephone hearing, rather than a personal hearing.

Edited by Michael Browne
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As strange as this layout of sign is, it does meet the guidance in the TSRGD and the Traffic Signs Manual. There's no way that i would have signed the restriction like that, but that's not much help! I do aympathise with the OP however, that's not an easily understandable sign.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hungrydoug said:

As strange as this layout of sign is, it does meet the guidance in the TSRGD and the Traffic Signs Manual. There's no way that i would have signed the restriction like that, but that's not much help! I do aympathise with the OP however, that's not an easily understandable sign.

I am pretty sure it doesn't 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It meets the guidance in the traffic signs manual Chapter 7:

 

"12.2.3. If the time period covers only “am” or “pm”, but not both, then “am” or “pm”, as appropriate, should be shown only against the end time."

 

Which could be read one of two ways, but there would be enough wiggle room to say it was conforming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...