Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What about the 300 payment I paid in December to stop repossession? And never defaulted since.    Just defaults off a previous year due to injury.    Car wouldn’t of been left there if I knew. How do I find out about a bill of sale?   I wouldn’t of left it there if they hadn’t made the arrangement with me. As I knew I would have the money to pay it by 18th March.     I have my car back now but it is damaged, which I’m going to have to pull out for. 
    • You cannot expect to claim any compensation for parcels which did arrive – even though they were delayed. That sounds a bit French to me. You can only recover compensation for parcels which were sent with them and which are lost. You say that they were 20 parcels. I think you need to give us more detail. I don't think we need a list of every parcel, but we do need to know how many parcels, whether the value was correctly declared, what was the declared value, when were they sent, and if you have you raised a complaint with. Which courier actually undertook the delivery?
    • The thing is, the administration has said there will be no payment coming.   "Unfortunately, whilst we have added your unsecured claim to the list of creditors within the Administration, regrettably due to the lack of funds in the Administration, there is no prospect of a dividend being paid to unsecured creditors. This means that notwithstanding your entitlement to Redress no payment towards your unsecured claim will be made. More detailed information on the reasons for this can be found in the Customer Redress Scheme and FAQs, which can be found by clicking on the link in paragraph 2 above."   So, I will obviously continiously beeing chased by UB or the debt collectors.   It was Unclebuck who emailed today saying the transferred the agreement to them
    • I'm sorry, but I don't really understand what you are referring to. Maybe you'd like to post up your particulars of claim again
    • They talk sence. So await the money. An administrator is placed in a difficult position upon how they can distribute funds they administer   so ignoring the powerless dca's , who currently owns the 2019 outstanding one? Who are 'they' ....
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

BPPM ANPR PCN - failed to pay - part reg only - even though I paid??!!

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 526 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

just type 

no need to keep hitting quote...




please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

come on , this is not your first thread regarding parking problems on this forum so please make yourslef more aware of what to expect and what we expect from you to enable us to help you.


We wnat to see the entrance to the land from the public highway along with any sigsn that are visible as you turn in. We want to see any signs in the car park that are different and we want to see any sign associated with the ticket machine.


Now the machine asks you to enter full reg but doesnt actually say you will be punished if you dont so they have to rely on other signs with the machine if they want this to be a contractual term that costs you money if you ignore it.




Link to post
Share on other sites

so sign 1 not a  contract but an "invitation to treat" and that means you dont have to accept the other contractual terms on the other signs. read up on this. there are persuasive cases you can quote on this


Tariff board makes no mention af paying more than £4 in big writing so it can be argued that even if the signs create a contract ( the payment  does, not these signs) then the lettering of the £100 charge should have the same prominence as the other main points.

many a claim has been chucked out due to inadequate or misleading signage and to my mind this is inadequate.


so we need to see what the machine says (or signs attached or ajacent to it) that wil be the actual contract)


Now this car park used to be managed by aonther IPC member so try and do some looking back at old threads and use the local paper online facilities to see if you can dig up some bad press on  whoever they were as you can bet that any new co will have terms that are more onerous forced upon them to be allowed to be there.


Also Ashley Kelley also runs 2 other parking cos with remarkably similar names so you will need to see the contract between the parking co and the landlord to see if it is actually the right entity sueing you.


that means you need to ask the DVLA who has accessed your keeper detaisl and why. there is the address in a stikky in this forum, you write as emails get rejected.


If for example if it was bank park Ltd who did the deed you have them for breach of the GDPR and you can ask for more money than they can ever make form parking. They are in trouble at the bank so even the threat of a claim may well cause Barclays to recover anything they can before it disappears.


star being as heartless as they are

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Received a request for payment of £160 from a company called ZZPS, inclusive of a £60 administration charge.


The reason incorectly states - failure to pay for parking. 


This is reason to claim compensation for distress and embarrassment under the GDPR.



An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not allowed to process inaccurate data though. I’ve submitted a complaint by email pointing this out.


I'm just going to ignore


An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

it isnt their data, it is their clients so you will get nowhere complaining . they arent obeying the law in other more serious areas so they arent going to take any notice of a complaint about data prtection

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s my personal data that the client has shared with the third party. 








An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

so what do you expect them to do then?

If you are going to spend all your time and energy arguing  an incorrect point then you may well miss out when the next real problem crops up.

 You cant go after a solicitor for doing what their client tells thena dn the same is true for a dca, if their client has the wrong personal data then you go aftrethem, the dca is untouchable on this point

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have informed both parties that the data is inaccurate - it’s all I can do at the moment. 



An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...