Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • i would suggest that you stick to researching on here only. use our search top right for say CTAX or liability order.   you seriously have some wild theories, but those are understandable.   as i have said, there won't be a court hearing you need nor would that help you at all nor are expected to attend, it's not like that, it's merely a rubberstamp exercise .   there is no right of forced entry for bailiffs collecting CTAX debts. the bailiff process is one of a letter which will be entitled Notice of enforcement, this gives you 7 days to pay the sum it outlines with an associated fee of £75 for it being sent. the 2nd step will be a visit, you have no legal remit to engage with them at all, i i would not do so under any circumstances, that visit will add a further £235 fee those are the only things a bailiff can do. the most they can charge is a total of £310.   police do not ever get involved in civil matters like CTAX debt. not sure where you ever got that idea from.   its saturday now so use the W/end wisely, get reading up HERE ONLY it might well pay you on monday to go RING the council CTAX dept and plead poverty etc etc. it might also pay you to find the email address or even better phone number of your local MP and get him involved. they can do wonders.   dx 
    • NPAP see here: VCS Spycar PCN PAPLOC now Claimform - no stopping - London Southend Airport ***Claim Dismissed*** - Page 7 - Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group
    • Hi Stu and dx1000uk,   I have done the online assessment and as I suspected I already receive the maximum benefits available to me.   Yes I was referring to the fact that some times I know that non-payment of council tax can lead to imprisonment so thanks for clarifying.   let's say I can't make their demands for payment and they do send bailiffs in, I assume these are the type of bailiffs I can just not let in and then after a certain amount of attempts they give up right? does the council then not send the police round? This is what I can't work out and worries me.   The council already know that I am struggling and can't make the payments but when do I get my chance to tell a court or the police that it's not that I don't want to pay but that I can't pay?    Walshy
    • Hi Stu and dx1000uk,   I have done the online assessment and as I suspected I already receive the maximum benefits available ot me. Yes I was referring to the fact that some times I know that non-payment of council tax can lead to imprisonment so thanks for clarifying. But let's say I can't make their demands for payment and they do send bailiffs in, I assume these are the type of bailiffs I can just not let in and then after a certain amount of attempts they give up right? But does the council then not send the police round? This is what I can't work out and worries me. The council already know that I am struggling and can't make the payments but when do I get my chance to tell a court or the police that it's not that I don't want to pay but that I can't pay?    Walshy
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

BPPM ANPR PCN - failed to pay - part reg only - even though I paid??!!


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 527 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

just type 

no need to keep hitting quote...

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

come on , this is not your first thread regarding parking problems on this forum so please make yourslef more aware of what to expect and what we expect from you to enable us to help you.

 

We wnat to see the entrance to the land from the public highway along with any sigsn that are visible as you turn in. We want to see any signs in the car park that are different and we want to see any sign associated with the ticket machine.

 

Now the machine asks you to enter full reg but doesnt actually say you will be punished if you dont so they have to rely on other signs with the machine if they want this to be a contractual term that costs you money if you ignore it.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so sign 1 not a  contract but an "invitation to treat" and that means you dont have to accept the other contractual terms on the other signs. read up on this. there are persuasive cases you can quote on this

 

Tariff board makes no mention af paying more than £4 in big writing so it can be argued that even if the signs create a contract ( the payment  does, not these signs) then the lettering of the £100 charge should have the same prominence as the other main points.

many a claim has been chucked out due to inadequate or misleading signage and to my mind this is inadequate.

 

so we need to see what the machine says (or signs attached or ajacent to it) that wil be the actual contract)

 

Now this car park used to be managed by aonther IPC member so try and do some looking back at old threads and use the local paper online facilities to see if you can dig up some bad press on  whoever they were as you can bet that any new co will have terms that are more onerous forced upon them to be allowed to be there.

 

Also Ashley Kelley also runs 2 other parking cos with remarkably similar names so you will need to see the contract between the parking co and the landlord to see if it is actually the right entity sueing you.

 

that means you need to ask the DVLA who has accessed your keeper detaisl and why. there is the address in a stikky in this forum, you write as emails get rejected.

 

If for example if it was bank park Ltd who did the deed you have them for breach of the GDPR and you can ask for more money than they can ever make form parking. They are in trouble at the bank so even the threat of a claim may well cause Barclays to recover anything they can before it disappears.

 

star being as heartless as they are

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Received a request for payment of £160 from a company called ZZPS, inclusive of a £60 administration charge.

 

The reason incorectly states - failure to pay for parking. 

 

This is reason to claim compensation for distress and embarrassment under the GDPR.

 

 

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not allowed to process inaccurate data though. I’ve submitted a complaint by email pointing this out.

 

I'm just going to ignore

 

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

it isnt their data, it is their clients so you will get nowhere complaining . they arent obeying the law in other more serious areas so they arent going to take any notice of a complaint about data prtection

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s my personal data that the client has shared with the third party. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

so what do you expect them to do then?

If you are going to spend all your time and energy arguing  an incorrect point then you may well miss out when the next real problem crops up.

 You cant go after a solicitor for doing what their client tells thena dn the same is true for a dca, if their client has the wrong personal data then you go aftrethem, the dca is untouchable on this point

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have informed both parties that the data is inaccurate - it’s all I can do at the moment. 

 

Regards 

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...