Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Faulty Elica Cookerhood via Appliance Direct


Mona287
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1741 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear friends,

 

We purchased an Elica Cookerhood via Appliance Direct (£660) that was discovered to be faulty by our fitter in the month of February

After a lot of struggle with the retailer as well as the manufacturer we were asked to wait for an engineer who would be replacing 

the faulty motor. This engineer keeps cancelling his visit in the last minute owing to various reasons, for example - 'Parts to hand are

not suitable' or 'Parts were not delivered' or 'Parts were delivered but not received by him', or 'Parts were lost in transit'. Today, I am very

sad as the engineer did not even bother to cancel, I waited all day at home for him to turn up.

 

We have been very polite and patient about the matter as usually in such cases irate customers can make things worse.

 

Elica's Tech department seems to be run by a third party and they rarely answer the phones. Elica too rarely respond to phone calls and 

if successful we get asked to wait and rebook the appointment. This has been going on for long enough. My daughter has asthma and 

we really needed this exhaust to be in working condition as our new kitchen has now started to look tired because of lack of air circulation.

 

Please could someone kindly advise us about our rights and how to go about handling this situation.

 

Mona

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you are just within the six month period so you should write to the supplier immediately and tell them that you are asserting your rights under the consumer rights and and that they have a single opportunity to carry out a repair after which you want a full refund for the cooker hood plus any associated expenses that you have incurred. For instance, if you have suffered any loss of earnings or holiday having to wait in for engineers then I would say that you can claim this as well.

Seeing that you have been mucked around so badly, I would put that letter in the form of a letter of claim and tell them that if it isn't sorted out within 14 days that you will issue a claim for the refund plus your associated losses. Only do this if you are prepared to carry out your threat. Bringing a small claim in the County Court is extremely easy and we will help you. On the basis of what you have told us your chances of success are much better than 95%.

I suggest that you send the letter straightaway – send it recorded delivery – send it to the supplier which I take to be Appliance Direct.

 

Be prepared for them to ignore you and to be obliged to issue the claim on day 15. Assuming that you have sent the letter of claim, spend the 14 days reading up on this forum about bringing a small claim in the County Court. You will soon realise how easy it is. At the same time you should register on the money claim website and start preparing your claim there.

Post your draft particulars of claim here and we will check that they are okay. I'm afraid this is likely to be the only way forward.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BankFodder said:

Well you are just within the six month period so you should write to the supplier immediately and tell them that you are asserting your rights under the consumer rights and and that they have a single opportunity to carry out a repair after which you want a full refund for the cooker hood plus any associated expenses that you have incurred. For instance, if you have suffered any loss of earnings or holiday having to wait in for engineers then I would say that you can claim this as well.

Seeing that you have been mucked around so badly, I would put that letter in the form of a letter of claim and tell them that if it isn't sorted out within 14 days that you will issue a claim for the refund plus your associated losses. Only do this if you are prepared to carry out your threat. Bringing a small claim in the County Court is extremely easy and we will help you. On the basis of what you have told us your chances of success are much better than 95%.

I suggest that you send the letter straightaway – send it recorded delivery – send it to the supplier which I take to be Appliance Direct.

 

Thanks a bunch for your kind reply. I will prepare this letter now and will take this up immediately. I have never done this before or made any claims in the past, so perhaps will need to show here the letter I draft.

 

Also, I am not sure how to prove anything as there are only these text messages from the engineer cancelling the visit. 

Thanks

Mona

Link to post
Share on other sites

By all means post your letter of claim here.

Under the consumer rights act, the burden of proof is on the supplier to show that the defect was not present.

Additionally, get a statement from your fitter who you say has discovered the fault and he should write you a letter telling you how he discovered the fault and what the fault is.

In your letter of claim tell the retailer that they are welcome to arrange an inspection of the units but they will have to do it within your 14 days because given the prevarication so far and the excessive passage of time – five months – you are not prepared to tolerate any further delay.

Tell them that if they want to carry out an inspection and they can do so by appointment or if they want they can arrange to have the item taken away although you will require a signature for its receipt. However, confirm to them again that you will not brook any further delay and that you will be issuing proceedings after 14 days. Suggest them that the most efficient way then to deal with this is simply to collect the old one and to supply you with a new one – and in which case you will suspend your threat to bring a legal action until the replacement has been confirmed as being satisfactory by your fitter.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BankFodder said:

By all means post your letter of claim here.

Under the consumer rights act, the burden of proof is on the supplier to show that the defect was not present.

Additionally, get a statement from your fitter who you say has discovered the fault and he should write you a letter telling you how he discovered the fault and what the fault is.

In your letter of claim tell the retailer that they are welcome to arrange an inspection of the units but they will have to do it within your 14 days because given the prevarication so far and the excessive passage of time – five months – you are not prepared to tolerate any further delay.

Tell them that if they want to carry out an inspection and they can do so by appointment or if they want they can arrange to have the item taken away although you will require a signature for its receipt. However, confirm to them again that you will not brook any further delay and that you will be issuing proceedings after 14 days. Suggest them that the most efficient way then to deal with this is simply to collect the old one and to supply you with a new one – and in which case you will suspend your threat to bring a legal action until the replacement has been confirmed as being satisfactory by your fitter.

Bad news and it cannot get any worse, the invoice is dated 18th of Jan 2019. The period expires today, what irony. I just looked through the mail and discovered this. Is this a lost cause now?

Screen Shot 2019-07-18 at 19.16.34 pm.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it's not a lost cause by any means.

The consumer rights act entitles you to have goods of satisfactory quality and they should remain that way for a reasonable period of time. Your cooker hood has never been satisfactory – so actually there's not a lot of difference. Tell them to repair it or replace it within 14 days. Give them an opportunity to inspect if they want but tell them that on day 15 you're going to send them the good news

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, the time limits under the consumer rights act begin from the date of delivery – not the invoice date. It seems to me that you may still be just in time for the assertion of rights under the six month rule – although as I have said it doesn't make any particular difference in this case.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this information. I see exactly what you mean. I will call Appliance Direct tomorrow and explain everything as I last spoke to them when the appliance was found to be faulty by the fitter back in February. 

I will first try to have them look into it but it they give me a cold shoulder, I will then start the process as per your advice by tomorrow afternoon.

 

Bless ya

Mona

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry to say but I think that you are making a mistake merely talking to them. I think you must now take control of the situation and you do that by sending your demands in writing on the basis that I've suggested above full stop

If you call them, they will continue to lead you around by the nose. Try if you don't believe me

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Read our customer services guide and implement the advice there. This is an absolute necessity if you have any telephone dealings with them or any other company

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again

 

I have sketched a letter. Please could you browse through it if you have a moment to spare.

 

 

Quote

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

[Reference: contract number]

Please refer to your  Invoice #71882367 wherein we had ordered ELICA HIDDEN-90 HIDDEN 898MM INTERGRATED COOKER HOOD for the price of £474.98 plus VAT which was received on dateXXXX faulty as per our fitter and the manufacturer Elica. 

Yourselves as suppliers and also the manufacturers of fully aware of the problems having been informed in previous correspondence, copies of which are attached.

We have allowed ample opportunity for the fault to be repaired and Elica has since been trying to repair the said item to no avail. 

If you feel that you wish to inspect the unit then you are welcome to do so by appointment but it must be within the next 14 days.

The Consumer Rights Act makes it an implied term of the contract that goods be as described, fit for purpose and of satisfactory quality. 

As you are in breach of contract, I am rejecting the appliance and request that you refund the sum paid to you of £474.98 plus VAT.

 

I also require you to confirm whether you will arrange for the appliance to be collected or will reimburse me for the cost of returning it.

If I do not receive your satisfactory proposals for settlement of my claim within 14 days of the date of this letter, I intend to issue a claim against you in the county court without further reference to you.

 

Yours faithfully,

My name

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please see highlighted edits above

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure you attach the previous corespondence

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...