Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • they can't, they were not operating as bailiffs as the letter on it's reverse says. and couldn't have been as the claim is less than the required £600 total to Cross to the High Court....so HCEO's cannot ever be involved,
    • persistent   What about the many many more 'refugees' coming back from holiday/business trips etc?   We don't want them traipsing across the country , using public transport or taxis, and stopping off to get such non essentials as food on their way to eventual isolation (maybe)  now do we.   and the hotels local to airports do need the business .... or haven't they donated enough to the Tory party?   Nice big hotels with pop up testing in the spare space at airports before the folks are shipped there ... They might even get to chat with people who have had a far more 'exciting' trip who are also awaiting test results eh? ...   What a wealth of information on the spread of the virus that would give ..... Well, provided it could be presented with a 'suitable' 'desirable' message that is. .. Otherwise it could end up 'just' another liability to Johnson rhetoric couldn't it?
    • Update on SEISS (Self Emplyment Income Support Scheme) - my application refusal as I was not eligible as my tax return was not received by the deadline.   I contacted my local MP's office and they have been dealing with HMRC on this matter.   I was over the moon that my mum manage to finally locate the proof of postage from the 10th April and my local MP kindly sent this over to HMRC on my behalf.  When I initially spoke to HMRC on the phone about this they indicated that as long as I had the proof of postage then I would still be eligible but in HMRC's final response to the MP yesterday they state:   "Had you provided a recorded delivery receipt, we could have tried to trace receipt of this document as we would have had to sign for the document. Proof of posting only shows when the document was posted and not when we received it. As previously advised, we cannot be held responsible for documents held up in the post. Our system clearly states that we received this document at midday on 29 May 20. I regret therefore that we cannot overturn our previous decision that Ms XXXXXXXXXX is not eligible to claim the SEISS grant.   I know that Ms XXXXXXXXXX will be disappointed with my reply and I am sorry for any upset this may cause her, but we must adhere strictly to the guidelines set by the Treasury department and we cannot accept a late return in order to claim the grant."   To say im upset is an understatement! Ive been unable to work for months and although I am eligible Im not.   Whats worst is that we have turned my parents house upside down looking for this proof of posting and the amount of time taken to write letters/emails has all been a complete waste of time.
    • Today is my final returns period they are giving me - Spent most of last night trying to find a decent replacement without luck so I think the only choice I have is wait it out for the magical revised part 
    • Yes that's what I was expecting, so thanks for confirming that for me. As soon as the LBA comes through I'll just put those two points down and tell them to never contact me again.     May I ask please how they've breached GDPR? Is it the aspect of contact without valid reasoning?
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 9 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 16 replies
FORMISTER

Horizon Parking CCJ

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

My friends wife ignored letters from Horizon Parking and their solicitors and now has a CCJ registered on her credit file.

 

Stupidiy, she also ignore the claims form which come from Northampton Bulk centre as it looked photocopied and she thought it was fake.


At the same time her work colleague did the same.

 

Her work colleague went to stand as guarantor for her daughters loan and got refused, she has now found out that a CCJ has been registered two months ago, so my friends wife checked her credit file and has the same, from two months ago.

 

Both received claims forms and didn't fill them in.


Neither of them have received notification of judgement however.


I am right in saying still that they should of done and would of been given the opportunity to pay the claim within. month at that point and not have a CCJ permanently on their file.


If this is the case, what is the way forward? Set a-side ?


My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose there's no comfort to you but I may as well say it for other people who visit this thread: you've been here since 2010 and the advice here for many years has been not to ignore these letters. And if you hover over the ignore link then it is fully explained as to why.

So it had you not ignored there might be a chance of them not taking this any further because they would then have realised that you were up for a fight. Because it was ignored, they immediately thought that it was an easy kill – and clearly it was exactly that.

You then received claims forms which (sorry) in a fit of wishful thinking someone decided to take the view that they were fake. This is highly unlikely – ever – and is always worth checking up on at least by calling the court office.

There might have been certain defences you could have raised that by and large it is now too late.

I think you will have to suck it up and as you have already suggested, if you pay within 28 days then there will be no CC J recorded against your credit file.

However, I gather that 28 days has passed and therefore the way forward if you really want to have a chance of avoiding the effect of CC J would be to apply for a set-aside and then if you managed to get it, take the opportunity to pay the money. However, you will incur the cost of a set-aside which could be as much as a couple of hundred quid plus the other costs associated with the case which has been bought so far.

Someone else will be a long to give you an idea as to whether there might even be a realistic chance of defending.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bankfodder,

 

I appreciate you taking the time to reply in length, but had you read my post you would realise that I haven't ignored anything, these are not my claims or CCJ's, neither party is related to me.

 

I first knew about any of this when my best friend called me this morning to tell me his wife and received a CCJ.

Also, I am not responsible of advising them to ignore any of it in the first place, I certainly don't ignore my own.

 

Also as I mentioned the CCJ's were registered 2 months ago, but they haven't received a copy of the judgement so didn't know anything about it.

 

My question was, given that she is perfectly capable of paying the judgement, is the best way forward for her to apply for a set-aside  given that its now outside 28 days


My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They both ignored the claims form.....they both have a default judgment.The fact that neither received notification of judgment may not be enough to convince a court to set a side.

Anyone could state the same to enable further time allowed to settle the judgment.

 

You need a valid defence to push through the set a side.

 

Regards

 

Andy


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy, thanks for replying

 

Yep, I know that's a bit thin on the ground, but I can't think of anything else.

 

Its whether a judge would accept that not receiving notice of judgement against them has denied them the opportunity to pay it within the 28 days.


My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems strange that both didn't receive a Notice of Judgment...same Court CCBC Northampton. ?

 

Would be an expensive gamble to try though unless you went without a hearing (£100) and made the application pursuant to :-

 

The court’s general powers of management

3.1

(1) The list of powers in this rule is in addition to any powers given to the court by any other rule or practice direction or by any other enactment or any powers it may otherwise have.

(2) Except where these Rules provide otherwise, the court may –

(a) extend or shorten the time for compliance with any rule, practice direction or court order (even if an application for extension is made after the time for compliance has expired);

http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part03

 

So not exactly a set a side...more of breathing space......if it could be proved that either Notices were not sent out or the Postal services were at fault.

Why not give CCBC a ring and enquire re the Notice of Judgment for claim numbers xxxxxxxx...were they sent out was the problem ?

you never know...best I can offer  FORMISTER.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that since the speculative invoice was 1st issued they have moved

Horizon would have gained their details then from DVLA for the time of the invoice

and everything was sent there.

 

sadly they've thus done nothing wrong.

 

dx

 

 

 

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys for your input, 

 

Yes Andy, same court, my friends wife only checked her credit file when her friend got refused credit and checked hers.


I will have a good read of your comments Andy, and update you on how I am going to advise her to proceed.

Thanks Again


My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 a court will set aside the judgement as long as they can produce a defence that has at least a possibility of being successful. The requirement to show a good reason for a set aside disappeared a year ago thanks to a Supreme Court ruling so just ignoring the papers wont damage the chances of a court granting the set aside.

A set aside is done via the form N244 and costs £255

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

 The requirement to show a good reason for a set aside disappeared a year ago thanks to a Supreme Court ruling so just ignoring the papers wont damage the chances of a court granting the set aside.

 

 

Could you expand on that EB..what ruling ?


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I objected to a set aside application by a large company who had by them lost 2 court claims by default the judeg at Hastings CC said that their reasoning for failing to respond and hence by challenge to the set aside were irrelevant because of a supreme court decision that made the set aside  automatic as long as there was a defence that had some likely success. I can give you the name of the judge who told me this but didnt get the opportunity to  ask about the SC decision.

apparently purjury in a set aside application is OK as well becasue it will be granted so spurious stuff becomes immaterial

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your referring to the following.....but that was after trial.

 

https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2017/12/18/county-court-has-power-to-set-aside-a-judgment-after-trial-if-it-was-obtained-by-fraud/

 

This is a default judgment...claim forms were received and not acted upon......and Notice of Judgment was never received by both parties...so a different matter.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no, not that at all.

I complained that the other litigant had perjured themselves in their set aside application and was told that it wasnt relevant because the courts hands were already tied into granting a set aside.

 

So i reiterate, get the set aside application in and it will be granted as long as you have somehting to say in your defence of the original claim.

Edited by ericsbrother

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, she phoned the court today and explained that she never received a judgement, the court advised to apply for a set-aside.

 

Is this the best way forward or an application to set-aside or The court’s general powers of management.
 

Just to say, the money isn't the issue and she can pay straight away.


My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if a CCJ sitting there on their credit files is going to cause them harm for 6yrs

the only way is to go for a set aside {£255 fee]

 

 

if the set aside is granted

then atleast even if they lose at a later hearing [as the set aside resits things to the time the claimform was issued]

even if they lose again, paying within 28days will ensure it no longer shows or harms them

just cost double the amount of the original CCJ.

 

 

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A set a side does not reset the payment dates...its either set a side and proceeds to trial or dismissed and remains on the CCJ Register. 


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so what we are trying to achieve is to allow her to pay within the 28 days that she should of been granted had she received the judgement.  Not receiving the judgement denied her of that right and therefore the CCJ will be on her credit file for 6 years.

She would of paid it, had she received it within the time frame.


My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And the only way to achieve that is as I have explained at the bottom of post #6


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so we will go with the Courts eneral powers of management rather than a set-aside.

`

do you know if this is a particular form?

Thanks 
Andy 

 


My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its still a set a side using the N244 but pursuant to a different rule...but before you attempt to make application you must follow the advice in #6 and find out if Notice of Judgment was sent out ...were there any problems....if the answer to that is no...then pointless using that tact.

 

Quote

" Why not give CCBC a ring and enquire re the Notice of Judgment for claim numbers xxxxxxxx...were they sent out was the problem ? "

 


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And there is also a further option .....

 

 


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok great, so first call the Creditors Solicitors and see if they will agree to a Consent Order to make full payment and remove the CCJ, before trying anything else.


My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Worth a shot....I cant see Northampton owning up to making a mistake..not unless you can catch them out and admit it :sad:


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Andyorch said:

Worth a shot....I cant see Northampton owning up to making a mistake..not unless you can catch them out and admit it :sad:

No, but the Royal Mail admit to losing 500k letters a year (although its estimated to me much higher).


My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But it then becomes the PO error not the courts.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...