Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Another one. Apparently this has been hushed up for about three months. They're working through their majority quite fast with all the sackings. Not that they've done anything about Menzies yet but he sounds like a blackmail risk. Here's the original article.   Revealed: Tory MP allegedly demanded campaign cash to pay ‘bad people’ ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 07:32:33 UTC  
    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”. The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses."   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
    • The shift to card and contactless technology in the past decade has been rapid - not just in Britain, but in all sorts of remote pockets of the world. This is yet a further sign of it.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sky Mobile Phone Contract - sold the phone, they want it back!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1738 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 
I need some advice with the legalities surrounding a mobile phone contract
- Please can somebody help! Sorry,
this might be long but I need to give the full story.
 
I have bad credit, but needed a new contract as I was looking for something different,
I applied for one with an iphone not expecting really to be accepted but stranger things have happened to me.
I have done this many times before, always declined.
This time, I applied online, and received an email stating I would hear after checks were done.
 
I was approved online within 30 minutes,
received an email, 
signed the contract online,
the phone and sim were sent out,
I was pretty happy as this could help with my credit and give me a decent sim.
It was a really good price too (around £26 a month all in).
 
Once the iphone arrived, I sold it.
 
I have done this in the past a few times, never had an issue,
fully intend to pay for the contract,
and use it too and from what I saw online this is not uncommon.
 
Plus part of the contract states it is payment for the phone each month as a separate entity I figured it was like buying it on credit.
I already have the same phone so saw it as a way of sorting the contract for a while anyway plus like the idea of an upgrade when mine gets old. 
 
A few weeks later, I go to log into the account, and it is restricted.
I call them up, they say it must be because my first bill payment is due.
Ok, no problem, paid over the phone.
 
Try to log in. No lifting of the restriction.
 
I call back, they have no clue why this is, and tell me to wait until Monday somebody will call me.
 
I then receive an email saying as requested my phone IMEI has been blacklisted and can no longer be used.. 😕
 
At this point, I freak out.
I sold the phone to a company and this is completely out of the blue and filled my head with worry.
 
I immediately contact them, to be told it appears I was approved by mistake,
the pre-checks show I cannot have a contract so it is immediately cancelled,
and they want the phone and sim card back.
I asked was it because of my credit, she said contact equifax.
So I assume so.
 
I have no clue what to do at this point.
As I sold the phone I am happy to pay them for it outright, if I must, but I am not doing that if they have blocked it because I will have to pay both them and the company I sold it to.
I read online they never unblock the phone so it is useless now, but why on earth did they block it anyway?
I have not told them I sold it yet as I just feel stuck.
 
Please can somebody give me some advice here.
How should I go about resolving this..
I feel like an idiot but also feel like part of this is not my fault,
I would never in a million years have expected to be put in this situation as it had all gone through.
 
They also sent me an email saying the phone must be in pristine condition or I will be liable to pay for it anyway.
Again, I purchased this phone on a loan contract agreement, is there anything to say they should honour this?

I am happy to pay for the phone if I have to, but it is now a brick, so I will end up inevitably paying them and also the company I sold it to the money back, which just seems crazy.
 
Clearly, I will never, ever, ever deal with this company again but I just can't see my way out of this.
Please can somebody help me out with some advice on where I stand and how to contact them?
 
Thanks
Link to post
Share on other sites

Who supplied you with the phone?

My own view is that they entered into a contract and they are bound by it. It really is going to depend on what action you want to take – but it won't be quick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you sign a credit agreement as well as a airtime contract?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Weirdly on their trust pilot the exact same thing happened to somebody recently (most recent review) but they had not sold the phone so no issues. My information should have been fine but I cannot go back and check but it was my address, name, dob as you had to show ID for the delivery which my dad did..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Sky Mobile Phone Contract - sold the phone, they want it back!

sorry we need to see what you signed and the full T&C's

if it was an HP agreement, then it was not yours to sell on.

 

i'm sure theres another topic here about people pulling this type of ….well you know the word..

and it didn't end well

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what did you sign?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesn't appear to be any legally binding contract or whatever whereby you cant sell it.

but you'll need to apply to get it unlocked. and they could refuse.

 

have they mentioned the word fraud in any comms since they disabled it?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

None whatsoever, and this was something I thought, I was happy to send them any ID or anything if it would help with it. 

If I just pay them for the phone if they accept, then apply for it to be unblocked, would that likely be the only route I have here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes probably

let our expert

fkofilee

comment please

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a further comment that I want to make this afternoon which will be a lot to digest 

But why do you want the phone unblocked? Who did you sell it too? 

 

Sky just use a CCA setup for the handset like O2. 

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sold it to one of the phone recycle companies as they offered a price as good as I could get from eBay etc. 

 

The block they have done is an imei block, the same as if you report it stolen 😕

 

If worst comes to worst I will pay for the phone and just refund the company too but the whole thing is just constantly going around in my mind - I never expected any of this to happen but it is causing me a great deal of anxiety

Edited by phonepains
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, fkofilee said:

Yep - Which is normal... 

Did you get your money and you are now being chased? 

 

They paid me but have not said anything, I was thinking I would bring it to their attention to be honest and be up front

Link to post
Share on other sites

So here we go.

I have read through the full T&Cs that you have sent me and it makes for some standard but interesting reading. 


In short - Sky can terminate your services as they see fit. Standard stuff - IE Fraud Reasons, Non-Payment, Move Abroad etc... Realistically they will sell this to a debt seller. 

However I have personally been affected by a situation like this before. IF the company accepted you and then suddenly cancelled after the 1st bill, you need to find out why.


An "Informed" Consumer is a "Dangerous" Consumer and for that reason. A lot of these companies do something called "KYC" - This is Know Your Customer. They do this for every customer.

It basically is a set of rules / practices that they need to maintain like checking for supiscious payments / transactions. It more applies to Financial Services. BUT...
Will also apply to Sky in how they do their Mobile / Hardware Contracts.

 

First off - Go check your credit file for free. 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=27931

 

Please read it through and through. 

 

You also need to be on the ball in case they have shut it due to Fraud reasons (Even though it is unlikely). So you need to do 2 things. 

 

You can send a Free DSAR (Subject Access Request) to them. This will give you all the information that they hold on you. This will also open up your eyes too. 

If you search the forum, you should find info on how to make a DSAR. 

 

You also need to read here -

https://www.cifas.org.uk/contact-us/subject-access-request

If you have been added with a CIFAS marker then you need to know why. 

 

You can also complain to the Ombudsman. But will need to complain to Sky first. DONT DO THIS UNTIL YOU HAVE ALL YOUR INFORMATION! You need to know what you are complaing about. 

 

If you have the IMEI - Go to Checkmend and pay for a £1.99 report on there. They will give you a full report on the device.

 

Don't deal with the Telephone Staff (Goblins) at Sky Mobile. 
Keep everything in writing. 

 

Once you have everything (Could take a month) come back here with your case file and we will help draft you something. 

 

You need to use your own drive here to get to the bottom of it. 

Somethings in the DSAR you wont beable to see as they are company sensitive but at the same time they should supply everything that IS NOT Sensitive. 
Also aswell if you have paid anything then you should be entilted to any refund to paid services, they need to put you back in the place you were before.

 

How much are they charging you for the device. Best thing I can see happening. You pay them for the device, they unblock it.
Full removal of any negative CRA Info and no CIFAS Marker. 

 

Now go read up in full... Any questions... Ask... 
But We all work full time on the forum so our responses might be a bit lacking sometimes :)

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...