Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help required with Yorkshire Water


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1665 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It would also be interesting to find out who installed the meter.  Whether done by a building development company or was it done by Yorkshire water themselves. It would be very nice if it was Yorkshire water

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well can you please take steps to find out.  If the installation was by YW and it was their error, then you are in an excellent position - and so are your neighbours

 

How long have they been there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was informed by a representative of YW that it was another company who did it on their behalf, next door have been in there for a lot longer than we have. as far as i am aware the meter was fitted in 2006

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bankfodder

i have worked out the interest at 8% on 50% of the payments i have made, but for ease i worked out the 8% from the end of each financial year. 

these are as follows

Actual Charge for 2 properties divided by 2   annual interest on amount owed (8%) daily interest number of days funds are owed total interest
£114.40   £9.15 £0.03 3651.00 £91.54
£302.20   £24.18 £0.07 3286.00 £217.65
£265.51   £21.24 £0.06 2921.00 £169.98
£215.26   £17.22 £0.05 2555.00 £120.54
£229.52   £18.36 £0.05 2190.00 £110.17
£248.09   £19.85 £0.05 1825.00 £99.23
£264.23   £21.14 £0.06 1460.00 £84.55
£256.48   £20.52 £0.06 1094.00 £61.50
£315.19   £25.21 £0.07 729.00 £50.36
£264.41   £21.15 £0.06 364.00 £21.09
£226.84   £18.15 £0.05 -1.00 -£0.05
£2,702.09         £1,026.57
  Total 50% of charged usage plus interest at 8% for each year owed

 

£3,728.66

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think i am going to wait for the SAR and then i can see when we made the monthly payments and then take the interest from that date. 

and then of course i will ask what they are prepared to offer for compensation for the hassle and time i have spent on this. Then of course i need to decide what we would want going forward, personally with the derisory offer that they have made i feel like insisting that i stay on a meter and that they make a new supply to my neighbours from the front and then disconnect mine from the back. But i have not totally decided on this yet. 

personally i can't see them agreeing to this as there literature states that "If your water company cannot fit a meter, you may benefit from an assessed charge"

 

can i check , do the figures i have calculated above look correct for the interest @ 8%

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't think you are correct

use the statint sheet

input each figure on the date they charged you it.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please present the figure for interest separately

Link to post
Share on other sites

your neighbour wont get a rebate as they arent paying for water used but a flat rate for a supply.

What yu need to know is what would the flat rate for your property be and as you have to keep the meter by law how they intend to calculate consumption if they dont change the supply.

What you need to agree with YW is that they will disengage the properties and then take reading to calculate a months consumption and then use this figure to back calculate your water consumption and then create a new bill.

 

your neighbour will have metered water from now on but hey, they wont have to pay any more for the past as back billing applies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ericsbro

 

I'm not sure what you mean by disengage the properties, i don't really want to agree anything with YW without understanding it and i',m also going to see what the SAR says first.

 

cheers

T

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to update, 

I received a letter from YW that says

"The Yorkshire Water Service Ltd Data Protection Team acknowledges your request on 19/07/2019 to access your personal data under the Data Protection Act 2018. 

 

We will be in touch with you within one calendar month.

 

Yours Sincerely

Data Protection Team"

 

is this letter acceptable ? 

i thought that GDPR said it had to be dealt with ASAP

 

thanks

Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you read the saryou sent ... its 30days

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

this has nothinmg to do with your neighbour, they pay a flat fee. You ae paying for their water as well as yours and that is the problem.

 

Your neighbour sending a SAR will gain exactly nothing as you already know there isnt a meter there.

waht you want is for YW to replace your connection so you only meter your own consumptioj so you can then calculate how much money they owe you. until this happens you can never get to the correct bill.

I wouldnt be warning them abotu what you might do next either, get them to put things right and then clobber them if they dont agree to a proper solution but you are 6 months at least away from that and if you arent paying for 2 lots of water at the moment even the minor adjustment between the consumption charge and the flat rate will be a bonus to look forward to rather than a point to argue about now

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Ericsbro

 

I realise the problem is that i have been (still am) paying for next doors water as well as my own. I last spoke with YW last week, the lady asked me what i thought of the refund that was calculated (show earlier in thread). I told her this was  unacceptable and at the very least we should look at paying me at least 50% of what i have paid. I was told that this can't be done due to the fact that when the meter was fitted (2006) if they had known or realised it was a dual feed then i would have been billed on the estimated usage. They are not willing to put a new connection into next door and are insisting on me going onto the estimated usage billing system for the future. 

The annoying thing for me is that from the figures she has given me and roughly assuming that we have used 50% of the water that has gone through the meter then i will end up paying more for the estimated usage than i would for a meter serving just my property.

 

ill update you when i hear more or get my SAR information

cheers

T

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one quick word here: don't worry about what they say is possible not possible. They are simply talking about their own internal policies which have nothing at all to do with their legal obligations towards you or your legal obligations towards them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, 

Just an update as today

i have received a letter from YW and also my SAR documents came whilst i was away last week. 

 

Firstly the SAR documents dont actually have a piece that i would expect that is like a statement (table kind of thing) showing the dates we have made payments by direct debit.

 

The only place i can see these are on some really bad copies of paper statements / bills that would also have been posted. 

Can i request this from them. 

 

Further to this i have today received a letter saying the below

 

"

Dear Mr ...........

Thankyou for speaking with me on 24th July 2019.

 

I'm sorry we've charged you for the water your neighbours have used. I fully appreciate how frustrated you must feel, epsecially when you've been overpaying for 11 years.

 

By way of apology for billing you incorrectly, i've credited your account with £220.00.

 

As we're no longer charging you on the meter that records the water you and your neighbour use and we can't fit a meter anywhere else, we're now billing you on an assessed charge. This is a fixed charge for homes which can't be metered. 

 

I've worked out what you would have paid based on our assessed charge. We owe you £1990.31 for what you've overpaid on the meter and an additional £47.18 for the interest. You'll receive a refund of £2257.49 in your bank within 5-7 working days.

 

I'll keep an eye on your account until 27th August in case you have any further questions. If you'd like to talk to me, please call me on 01274 318013

 

Yours Sincerley."

 

When i last spoke to YW on the 27th July i did tell them that i do not agree with the way in which the refund has been calcualated and that also i am not waanting to go on an assessed charge. 

 

what should i do next.

 

thanks

Tom

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but I'm away at the moment and have very patchy Internet access. I'll have to try and get my head back into action on the story on this thread. However it sounds to me as if they are proposing to make you a refund – but of course without interest so effectively it means they have had an interest-free loan from you for 11 years. I wonder if they would do the same for you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Bank, 

thats what i thought although she says in the letter that they calculate interest at £47.18 not sure how. 

 

enjoy your holiday !! and i will contact them thanking them for the advance payment but in no way do i accept this as full and final agreement.

 

meanwhile i will try to work out what i have paid when to try and work out the interest.

 

cheers

tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay. I'm trying to get my head around this.

How much do you say they shouldn't recently refund you?

How much interest do you think they should reasonably be paying you on top of that assuming that we are talking about 8% interest.

Somewhere in the Yorkshire water website they talk about refunding interest when overpayments are made. Can you find that these.

I gather you prefer that your supply is metered. Seeing as a metre has been installed on your property, it seems to me that they have a contractual duty to use the meter and I am sure that first of all they can use it, second of all that they can isolate the supply from your neighbours and provide a separate supply to your neighbour. I'm quite certain that it is merely a question of economics.

I'm wondering if there is a way to contact your bank and to instruct them to refuse any payments from the mass company. I think it is quite important to start claiming a figure which they disagree with and then to bring a Canticle action against them for that figure is 8% interest. Once the papers are in then they will have no choice but to pay the interest. One thing you want to avoid is Yorkshire water making a part payment to you so that eventually if you have to bring a legal action you will only be able to bring action for the balance as interest on that balance. It would be very difficult to claim interest on money which had already been paid – although we can certainly try and if push comes to shove that's what we'll do.

If you agree, I would send a recorded delivery letter to the water company instructing them that you disagree completely with their calculations and telling them that they are not to make any payments to your bank account until you have calculated the full extent of their debt to you.

Also I would contact your bank and find out from them if it is possible it is not any payments in. Strictly speaking I'm sure that this is possible. However you will be dealing with the drones on the telephone will never have come across this idea before in their entire lives of somebody not wanting to accept money being paid into account and so they are likely to object and to say that it is not possible. Your position would be that you are simply exercising control over your account and that you want them to obey your instructions. I think you will need to push it and then to confirm in writing. If there is any objection then you should immediately begin an ombudsman complaint so that they realise that it is serious and that they have to take formal notice of the fact that you are giving them a certain instruction as to the access to your account. It may be unusual but it seems reasonable enough to me

Link to post
Share on other sites

So , 

after sending a letter refusing to accept the refund that was offered i received a phone call yesterday and an email that sums up the conversation i had. I have copied this below. 

Good morning Mr 

Thank you for your email received on 16 August 2019.

I’m sorry you disagree with our calculations and felt that my colleague didn’t listen to you.  I understand you don’t want us to make any account
adjustment or accept our proposed solution, until we look at everything again for you.

We’re committed to providing our customers with the highest quality services, so I’ll do all I can to help you and put this right.

I’m pleased we had the opportunity to talk about your concerns and decide on the best way forward.  As we agreed, here’s a summary of the issues we
talked about:

· You requested details of your metered bills and payments (I’ve attached these to this email).
· You don’t want to accept the solution we offered, of billing you on our ‘assessed charge’ tariff.
· You don’t want to accept the goodwill payment offered £220.00 and feel you could have built your extension 2 years earlier, if we hadn’t charged you
too much.

· The meter readings we billed you for include water used at 74 Scotchman Lane, because you have a shared supply pipe.
· You’d like 50% of your water and sewerage volume charges refunding to resolve this.
· You’d like interest on your overpayment calculated accurately and based on 8% (not the Bank of England base rate).
· You spoke to our technician and you said he advised it would be easy to alter your private pipework, so a meter can be fitted just for your home.
· You prefer to pay a metered charge.
· I’ll look into the points you’ve raised, and I’ll do all I can to work towards an amicable solution with you.

I’ve taken the first step and I’m pleased to confirm that we’ve arranged a meter survey to be carried out on 6 September 2019 (arriving between 10am
and 12 noon).  This survey will be done by our service partner ‘Morrison Utilities’, and they can estimate what it will cost you to have the pipework
altered, so a meter can be fitted.  Once I have the results of their visit,

I’ll give you a call so we can talk about our next step.

After we reach a solution and agree how you’ll be billed, I’ll be happy to work out a new interest calculation for you.  We use the Bank of England base
rate and this won’t be changed, but I’ll be happy to renegotiate a final settlement figure with you.  If we pay interest, this will be subject to current HMRC
taxation rules.

I assure you, I’ll keep an eye on your account and update you on each step we take.  I’ll call you again by 13 September 2019 about our progress.

In the meantime, if you’d like to talk to me, please call me on 01274 318452 and I’ll be happy to help.  If I’m not available you’ll be able to talk to
colleague or leave a message.

Regards

 

Personally i am not happy with the email especially as I didnt mention that i would pay for any pipework to be altered. He did say to me on the phone that the pipes after the boundary are ours and therefore our responsibility. I did then point out that if this was the case then there is nothing to stop me cutting and capping the pipe after it enters my property. 

 

I am now going to try work out what the refund with 8% interest is from the figures he has provided.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why aren't you recording your calls?

 

Please monitor this thread for a fuller reply over the weekend

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 statint sheet does flat rate at 8% for you

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...