Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

IDRWW/IDR PAPLOC now SD served


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1645 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

Have been activity reading UAE threads on CAG for a number of months now and haven’t posted questions as most threads have answered questions or helped me.

 

I have recently received Letter of Claim from IDRWW with the contact a solicitor for CWD, but with an IDRWW email address.

 

Im looking for some advice on how to proceed as I can’t find many threads of this manner. 

Tx

Link to post
Share on other sites

obviously going for a backdoor CCJ as I suspect you've never told them in writing where you are residing.

 

expand on the debt please

but yes you must reply within 30days.

 

I will guess you've been in the UK a good while and have moved since coming back too?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX

 

It’s a credit card debt, I don’t want to go into full details regarding the amount as I know they read this forum. But the interest has taken the debit to over 500k dirham.

 

They’ve had my address and have sent me letter ands emailed me over the years a few times I have replied explaining my personal issues and situation. Which they we we ok with.

Last time I heard from them was in 2018 and now I have received this letter of claim.

 

It isn’t titled letter of claim but says it is letter of claim in paragraphs. They sent statements, signed agreement document and forms to complete.

 

So your recommendation is to complete forms and reply to them?

Edited by Cinderella18
Link to post
Share on other sites

just clarify things..

 

you have informed them in writing of your present address and there are no previous addresses since your returned/came to the uk this period if there was another?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes DX that is correct. This has been the only UK address and they are aware of that.

 

In terms of the debt, the bank I’ve the years kept increasing the limit as I am fed he account well, every time they did I called and asked for it to not happen as I was not happy to manage the large limit (trust myself) they talked me out of it and put a number of purchase on payment plans and recommended that I keep the large balance.

 

This happened a number of times over the years and they could see the balance building up and are very irresponsible in their lending practise.

 

I was using the card to live as the monthly payment was high and they could see that but kept raising it without my consent.

 

Dubai was very expensive to live in and became increasingly hard to manage so we left as we also had family health issue back in the UK.

 

hppe that helps    

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you

I revise my advice then

they are well aware of your correct address

do not reply.

 

let the original creditor issue a claim in their name if they are that stupid.

 

i will guess as per the other crap on cag that the letter of claim is in fact not one entitled LOC from a SOLICITOR but from IDRWW a debt collector who cant issue a PAP LOC anyway ..and the solicitor should be stating their client as the original bank not some fake/powerless dca at the next nearer the bog than him.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to IDRWW & International Debt Recovery- Letter of claim

hehe

they quotes the supposed PAP rules but don't abide by them

how funny.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

click pap and read 

 

a DCA is NOT A CREDITOR

IRDWW are NOT solicitors.

 

only a solicitor stating their client as [the bank] can issue a PAP LOC.

and that [if they abide by and even understand - which they don't at present ..the Pre action protocol process] means its a requirement before they can even think of issuing a claimform. which the court can hit them over the head with if they don't and issue a claimform.

 

you not responding to a PAP LOC is of little consequence even if it goes to court, so even if a solicitor for client[ the bank] does sent one i'd still ignore it. 

 

its NOT a requirement for bankruptcy [the other alternative in their DCA threat-o-gram letter above]

 

its just a cleverly worded letter from a powerless DCA designed to make you wet yourself.

as your post one outlines now if you go back and read your response carefully too

you fell for it as you've made several name errors upon who has done what, what they want and said 

 

also look at the footer...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I didn’t mean to make mistakes as was just trying to give you more context and information... as I said this is all very new to me and confusing which is why I asked for some advice....

 

Help me out a little... what have you spotted on the footer that a layman like me hasn’t.

Appreciate the help 😉   

Link to post
Share on other sites

ofcourse you didnt mean to make mistakes

you were LEAD into making them.

that's the whole point..DCA's CON PEOPLE, that's all they do.

 

whose the letter from in the footer?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

stop ringing them

like CAB they are not always correct.

 

a DCA is NOT A Creditor!! did you not read pap section 3 like I said

 

even if they own the debt an LOC must be sent by a solicitor.

 

please stop panicking.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

we don't give private advice as that help no one bar you - not what CAG is about.

however lets look at the question 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right here goes.

 

I didn’t reply to the PAP as you advised.

I did email them explaining my personal situation - ill health to my partner with no treatment on nhs with ongoing consultation 

My own personal mental health issues 

 

That I have no money or assets due to ongoing issues.

 

I have never admitted to any proposed debt 

 

I have now received a letter from CWD saying that IDR has passed case details and I they have seen I have recently obtained a charge on property but not paid the creditor. (The IDRW contact is the same as the CDW). They know nothing about this charge so it sure what they have seen.

 

I need to reply in 7 days with settlement offer or they have been instructed to take legal action without further notice.    

 

What next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can instruct my dog to sit

if it does is a totally different matter.

 

silly idea not to reply to that pap

that's 2 schoolboy errors now,

but you've replied

shame you are using email too

 

as for the charge someone else has on your property

anyone can view the land registry entries

its a vailed threat that they can see you have assets so if you don't pay we'll poss do the same.

 

now of course the property is not in your sole name?

but the UAE debt would be

so even if they did, it would be a useless restriction k.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

With respect you advised me not to reply to the PAP as you said it needs to come from the original creditor.

 

yes property is in joint names.

uae debt is in sole name.

 

should I reply to PAP now or to the letter?

Ps Thank you for the help!

 

I couldn’t offer more than £1 even if this was correct... which it isn’t! 

As I explained to them in my email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes that's what im saying but you've replied anyway so lets see.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • dx100uk changed the title to IDRWW/IDR PAPLOC now SD served

no assets no SD.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cinderella18 said:

I have now been served a SD.
 

Reading on the forum is my next step to set aside. Can you please help me with this, grounds etc. I don’t reorganise the debt they are claiming.  

 

If they go for bankruptcy they will get nothing as I have nothing, don’t see the logic 

 

Could you scan and redact and upload a copy of the Statutory Demand ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got a genuine dispute to set a side ?

 

Here is the full document and the parts that they have not sent you.

 

Can you confirm it is Form SD2R ?

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-sd2r-statutory-demand-under-section-2681a-of-the-insolvency-act-1986-debt-for-liquidated-sum-payable-immediately

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...