Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Self Employed - Ex Client Harassment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1753 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am a self employed web developer. I work with a LOT of clients across the year, as one of my products is aimed at startups and low budget small businesses. I would say that 98 out of every jobs go extremely well. Most of my clients are pleased in terms of what they get for what they pay. However I had a really bad experience today and need a), to vent a little and b). to get some rational input from level headed folk like yourselves that are not feeling the way I am at the moment.

 

Before I start a project, my clients are sent a contract. The contract is very basic, but covers the law in England and Wales. The contract contains a termination clause which says that the client can terminate the contract at any point and the job will be closed as long as they pay for all work done up to the point of termination. The contract also states clearly that I will only be able to work to deadline provided the client provides me with everything I ask for ON TIME. (logos, payment gateway access and other stuff etc).  Because I work remotely all my emails are tracked and monitored. I can see when an email has been opened and even the documents within the email. The client in question opened the email and the contract document and then closed the document about 40 minutes later. more than the time that is needed to read the contract in full. I sent the client a copy of the open and read receipt and told them that I am proceeding on the basis that they have read and agreed to the contract. They then instructed me to do the work.

 

I took a deposit for £500 and proceeded with the mock up and the design that the client subsequently approved. There were a number of unusual technical tasks which I completed anyway. I then asked the client for access to their payment gateway account as there were issues with how VAT was being applied. We were six working days off targeted completion date which was the first working day in January plus one - i.e. 3rd of January.  I asked for the payment gateways access details. I had told them early in December that I would need these details. The client told me on the 27th January that they were unable to get these details as their previous developer had them and they were closed until the 7th January. I informed the client that this meant that there would be a delay as I had allocated work time  for the six days for his project and that new projects would be starting on the 3rd of January. Essentially the delay meant a loss of a weeks work and I would have to reallocate time slots to complete their work.

 

Nevertheless I didn't get the login details until the 9th January. Together with my team we allocated time to work on this 11th, 14th, 15th and 16th January. The client sent us the incorrect details and we could not access the  account to create the API (a piece of software to make it all work). I then asked for the correct details. We didn't get the right login details until the 19th January. We urgently reallocated time to work on this on the 23rd and 24th January and discovered there were problems with how the VAT was being handled. I notified the client. I then became ill for about a week, I let the client know that I was ill and we got back on task on the 28th January.

 

Again I asked the client for standard sized images which he couldn't provide and I had to go into his old website and resize the images that were on the website.  I explained to him that the delays for two weeks in December and in January were beyond my control and then again until the end of January also no fault of mine. That I was now having to reschedule his work to complete it but we were most of the way there.

 

I asked my team to take the development offline completely and work on it to complete it within 21 days based on how we had to juggle other client work, and the lack of the clients ability to work with us within time frames was seriously hindering the issue. I contacted the client in Early February and he said his wife (The senior director of the company) would be away for a week and I would have to wait for her to be able to provide more of the information that I needed. I received this information on the 11th of February. On the 18th of February I got a call from him, His wife in the background ranting like a banshee telling me they were going to terminate. I explained to him very calmly what the delay had been and he said to me that OK as long as it was delivered by the 1st March. 

 

I told him that would be no problem, as I had stopped taking new work and (stupidly) told him that we had had a bereavement (18th of Feb) and I was going abroad for the funeral so his work would be done before I left on the 7th March anyway.

 

We spent time over the next two days moving the project to a several offline servers to test that everything was working the way it should and prepare for upload to the server. I tried to call him on the Tuesday and the Wednesday (My Phone logs show this) On the Tuesday their office phone rand out, and then there was a long beep, I can only assume that their answer phone was full. On the Wednesday I tried to call his mobile but I got that the number was not available. These were merely courtesy update calls. On the Thursday 22nd February he called and said that because I wasn't communicating, he had decided to terminate anyway. I told him the work was 95% complete and that I would send the closing documents and the all the files.

 

He told me that he didn't want the files, he wanted his money back. I tried to explain to him that I had done work and that he was liable for work completed. He demanded his money back - Dont forget that I was grieving, and he knew it - while working to deliver before I left for the funeral. He was exceptionally aggressive. I agreed to look at the current account and refund any monies left over but that would only happen once I returned.

 

I returned a little more clear headed and realised that he had only paid the deposit and not the second interim invoice that he had been sent. Essentially for the work done he owed me £400. On April 1st I sent a short email explaining that in fact despite undertaking to pay him excess funds under duress, I had now done an audit of the account and in fact I was owed £400. Because of his inconsistent behaviour and inability to meet his end of the deal in terms of the contract, I was going to write off the contract and that he had until the 1st May to download his files and the work I had done, and I sent him an access reminder to the folder. The email was opened briefly. The link to the folder was not clicked.

 

Today 6th July, more than three months later - The guy turns up at my home address (with his wife), just after I got out of the shower, and started banging on the door. My adult son opened the door and he asked for me. My son asked who he was and he said, without identifying himself I know exactly who you are - You are her son! Now my son has never met, or spoken to this man. I was upstairs just out of the shower with a towel around me. I have a mobility disability so have a carer to help me in the bathroom. I opened the window and the way the sun was reflecting on my neighbours window meant I couldn't see them below the window and asked who they were. He asked if I didn't recognise him and I said that I cant see because of the glare. he then yelled at me I am ****** . I said to him I am just out of the shower , need to get dressed as I have somewhere to be. He yelled at me in the street "You owe me money! I told him I didn't and that I had taken advice on the issue (which I have). He said so had he, so I said to him to put it in writing, send me a letter and we'll deal with it from there.

 

He yelled that he didn't need to write a letter and the was going to send the "right kind of debt collector" to deal with this, clearly insinuating that he was sending henchmen! _ I told him Id see him in court. As I did this the towel slipped and he stepped back into the street and started taking pictures through the windows starting with me naked. I told him to stop. he then walked around taking photos of my house, the cars around my home and the side of he house in the garden. My son had to tell him to leave the property.

 

I then called the police and obtained a police report number as I made a complaint of harassment.

 

Now here's the thing.

 

Shes a director of a public limited company. surely she knows better than to behave like that?  I run a small business and I use very specific procedures when I feel money is owed. I send letters, at least six or seven. I then send a recorded delivery letter. I make phone calls. I ask debtors if they need help to pay a bill. Getting nasty is the absolute last resort and in nine years of business, I have only ever once had to issue court papers to get someone to talk to me.

 

I Do not chase people who don't have the money or are having a crisis. Its counterproductive. In one case I bought 40%of a guys business to rescue him and put him back in profit in under six months. I never personally turn up at someones house outside of business hours and harass them and threaten their family. I certainly don't stalk them online to establish what their relatives look like! This is the most unprofessional crazy experience I have ever had in business. Personally I think they are in financial crisis and are being bullies to try and recover money they couldn't afford to spend in the first place. The reason I haven't had a solicitors letter or a formal request to pay I am assuming is because they cant afford to. BUT assumption is a dangerous thing and it may be that they are just big bullies. However screaming across the street details about a financial contract with another business is in fact in contravention of  GDPR. And broadcasting my financial relationship with them during a very busy time on my street was not only inappropriate but also an offence (aside from the harassment). I have three neighbours that can confirm that they heard everything.

 

Either way I am annoyed, but also concerned that the photos he took of my home can be used to work out a way to break in or attack me or a member of my household as he made it clear his method of debt collection would not be an official one at all!

 

Any ideas? Fortunately I am moving house in a couple of weeks, but I don't want the next resident of the property to suffer these rather unbalanced crazies....

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

short answer is to do nothing and see what they do next.

yes, they owe you money but it seems as though your terms of business allow them to walk away from the contrcat as you failed to bill them at certain stages. If they continue to cause problems then continue to call the police and record anything you can.

I also suggest the following

If they are a director of a PLC then that company will have to have public AGM's. get someone to buy shares and attend and ask the boad why one of their directors is behaving in a manner that is harassing and invites the interest of the police and what are the board going to do to stop this person  bringing the company into disrepute and whetehr her private business activity is compatible with her role as a director bearing in mind this behaviour?

Edited by ericsbrother
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ericsbrother said:

short answer is to do nothing and see what they do next.

yes, they owe you money but it seems as though your terms of business allow them to walk away from the contrcat as you failed to bill them at certain stages. If they continue to cause problems then continue to call the police and record anything you can.

I also suggest the following

If they are a director of a PLC then that company will have to have public AGM's. get someone to buy shares and attend and ask the boad why one of their directors is behaving in a manner that is harassing and invites the interest of the police and what are the board going to do to stop this person  bringing the company into disrepute and whetehr her private business activity is compatible with her role as a director bearing in mind this behaviour?

Thanks ericsbrother

 

They have a limited company - three directors, him, his wife and his father. So thats not going to do anything.

 

The police contacted me this morning. There is enough corroborating information for them to interview under caution and take his phone from him. He is also Senior Equalities Advisor  (including vulnerable people) for a large Local Authority and once they have issued a PIN (Police Information Notice), they will inform his employer as this is in the public interest. 

 

I billed him at the beginning, and again when we went into development in January and again when I sent the last email on the 1st April.

 

The issue for me really isn't the money. I write off situations like this because the energy that it takes to chase people like this is better channelled investing in a different client that pays. I simply want him to go away, which according to the police is likely to happen once he is questioned under caution and his phone is take from him for examination. As I said I move away in three weeks, he will always be able to find my new office but he needs to get through two electronically controlled access doors,  a videophone and a reception area, and the police station is next door .....

 

Thank You for your input. I was really venting and needed a little moral reinforcement :-) - we all have bad days, but this was really OTT!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so they run a limited company, not that one of the is also a director of a PLC. I didnt think that your dealings was with a large PLC but that the person giving you grief had more than one job and so if it was the case they would leave themselves answerable in a public meeting. Shame about that but if they get a serious earwigging and their phone seized and probably a FPN if they answer back that should see them off.

As they havent paid for your work in its entirety and have broken the contract agreed between you ( though they may caim that as you didnt do everything it is voided) the work remains your intellectual property so keep it. Let them start again elsewhere

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...