Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VCS ANPR 2015 PCN claimform - Berkeley Centre Sheffield S11 8PN ***Claim Discontinued***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1435 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have now had a response from Planning Enforcement re my question as to whether ANPR cameras were considered when they conducted their investigation into signage at Berkeley Precinct.

 

Answer: Yes and generally speaking, they are classed as being de-minimus i.e. not significant enough to consider as development.

 

No joy there then, so will have to re-visit the angle of the declared purpose of the data obtained from the cameras and the fact they don't record actual parking time etc. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting that Richie Boy's case was won on the contract issue. No reply from the land agent on this topic and not sure whether I should email them about it, or whether they might actually fabricate something if I push them further, so as to cover themselves and their lessee. Do you think it would be better to just let VCS wallow at the hearing, or is it better to pursue it in advance? Any advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

read up on agency. the agent isnt going to reply to you so you have to get the judge to amke an issue of this lack of a contract with the landowner and thus the breaking of the chain of authrity between them and VCS

use anything you can find, read all of the toics in the parking pranksters blog and copy anhthing slightly relevant and add it to your bundle

Link to post
Share on other sites

My daughter has received a letter from the court inviting her to go to mediation.

She has to respond within 7 days.

 

She is wilting under the stress and I have a battle to keep her on track, as she is concerned about childcare costs for the hearing and the fact that another baby is due in January.

This is exactly what VCS depends on.

 

I have told her no way, we are not negotiating, those rogues aren't entitled to a penny and we will claim back the childcare costs!

 

I think both claimant and defendant have to contact the mediators, but I haven't seen the latter yet.

 

I presume this is normal procedure. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

N180 

always no to mediation on PCN cases

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

didn't make a mistake and gave them an email ad did you?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Happy New Year to all you wonderful supporters on this site.

 

We now have a hearing date of April 6th, which coincidentally is my birthday, I hope it will result in a celebration!

 

Can we expect to receive further correspondence from the court re instructions for the Witness Statement, which I understand has to be submitted to VCS & the court 1 month before the hearing date?

 

I shall be working on a draft from hereon.

 

I had hoped that the government would produce their Code of Practice for Private Parking Companies before the hearing, but they have been otherwise occupied,  and I assume consultations are still ongoing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

usually 14 days for WS exchange

and no they don't give guidance but we do ..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you may well get a begging letter dressed up as a threat from VCS offering you the chance to pay them just £120 or thereabouts for them to drop the claim. If you do it is a sure signs that they are thinking of pulling out.

 

Now check with the court to see if they have paid the allocation fee 9 probably have as you have a date) and check when you have to exchange docs by, usually 14 days before. you have to send a copy of everything you want to use to court and also to VCS. If your bundle to VCS arrives a day or 2 late but got to court on time nothing bad will happen

 

When VCS sned theirs post it up here so we can pick holes in it as well. there are procedures at court that need to be considered but more of that nearer the time such as who signed their docs and who is going to attend on their behalf.

 

Mediation not practiable for this, you either owe them or you dont, its not like a buiolder claiming that you need to apy him for dodgy work and you refusing to apy, where there are grounds to mediate on paying for some of the work etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thx Eric's Brother.

 

The latest is that VCS has until 2pm on 9th March to pay the trial fee of £25.

We have to submit copies of the Witness Statement and all associated documents to both the court and the claimant no later than 28 days before the trial date of 6th April, which I believe would also be the same deadline of 9th March.

 

This would mean that the Claimant would get to see the Witness Statement before paying the fee, although if we time it right so it arrives on 8th March, they won't have much time to review it. Would you agree?

 

I'm working through all our evidence but will need as much time as possible to put it all together.

The Defendant is about to deliver her second baby, so the timing is not good.

 

May I post a draft for your consideration, once it starts to make some sense?

 

Thank you to everyone on the site for all your support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes post up your WS 

but i'd use your LiP advantage here and await theirs before you sent yours..

 

you sure its 28days?

normally its 14 days?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A question on practicalities:

I have read that the Witness Statement should be placed in a ring binder, with a table of contents, and the evidence listed in appendices, to make it easy for the judge to read, and then submitted to the court by hand.

I'm happy to do this before the 28 day deadline, along with the relevant original photos, as long as I get a receipt!

 

I understand a copy of WS + documents can be sent by email to the Claimant.

I presume they need the whole package too, so can I send them scanned copies of the photos + evidence?

 

It might be easier to just mail it all, with signed for delivery

- does it have to arrive on the same day that I deliver it all by hand to the court?

 

Any guidance would be very helpful - thanks. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can scan and send yes.

although most will be PC based production anyway

so rather than scanning

file save as .pdf

attach that..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Our Witness Statement is about half done, but needs seriously condensing & only about 2 weeks to go.

 

Apparently my daughter has just received a package which sounds like a possible statement from VCS which she says is about 40 pages long!!

 

I'm going to collect it tomorrow and will then try to stick it up here for your further entertainment.

 

I may have to rewrite the WS based on this. 😬😜

Link to post
Share on other sites

half of it will be blather and rubbish dancing around what is Law, what is permissable, and trying to paste over their case shortcomings.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes correct

that's what we said earlier

get their 1st

use yours to rip it apart

 

should be easy to win now they've played their cards.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet it doesn t mention the claims they have lost from this site.

Look some up on the Parking prankster's blogspot and use them as examples.

 

By all means glean similar from other motoring forums as well,

each has its own approaches but try to avoid using verbiose openings to your statement.

 

anything starting " it is admitted that the defendants is".... makes me sink in my chair, no-one talks like that so use the third person " the defendant" but them write in english rather than lawyer speak.

 

I say defendant, claimant etc rather than names at it is then clear who is saying what and about whom whereas if you say Bill said that Pete told him Bill was wrong it doesnt explain what part they are playing in this drama

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's really helpful Erics Brother. Thank you.

 

I had written The Defendant etc. but then read on another site that you should always personalise it and call yourself I, so I changed everything.

 

I must admit I prefer the 3rd person, then everyone is very clear who is who.

I'm picking up the story from Sheffield this afternoon - can't wait!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...