Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Isas already allow you to earn tax-free interest on up to £20,000 each tax year. But under recent reforms, they are now supposed to be more flexible.View the full article
    • The NTK is pretty good at complying with the Act  as is the Notice to Driver so no help there. I seem to remember OPS getting hammered by a Judge [in brighton I think] so they seem to have tightened po their act since. The organ grinder is the MA and the monkey is OPS.
    • @jk2054 and @BankFodder - Your feedbacks in posts #199 and #202 have been incorporated into the attached WS. As usual, amends are in blue in this draft. Based on other WS drafts I've seen where the issues in dispute are part of the WS, I built my first draft WS in the same format and hadn't seen it to be an issue before. You will notice that the 'witness statement' has been replaced with 'Claimant's Statement' so that issues in dispute does not need to be on a separate page before the WS. This is especially given the work that has gone in to reduce the size of the WS to 8 pages. Also thanks for the suggestions re: confidentiality - I agree with your views and will stand firm on this if a condition of confidentiality is brought up. I have not been approached by Evri on this forum or by email. I haven't yet had success in paying the hearing fee. I am calling the court as often as I can (during work breaks/lunch etc.) and have sent 2 emails to the court requesting a call back. If i don't have any success by the end of this week, I'll send another email chasing for a call back. @BankFodder - Also attached is an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at EVRi - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender and the recipient (I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice).  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (sender / recipient) is present in the contract between Packlink and Evri. If this invoice is no good, then please let me know / delete it from this post. Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • It can be frustrating when clients fail to pay for services or products rendered, ignore payment reminders, or claim an inability to pay. How quick do you pass to a Debt Collection Agency like www.corporatedebtrecovery.co.uk 
    • The Court s pretty informal. The Judge [who you call "Judge" rather than Sir or madam] will not be wearing a wig and gown just a suit and it is advisable that you do the same and a tie. Other than that the Judge will do most of the talking .If they haven't received a WS from the scrotes either the case will probably be thrown out straight away. Usually the Judge will ask their lawyer a number of questions then ask for your take on things and then the case will be decided.  UKPC 0 Mystic Bertie 5. Then ask for your expenses time off work [if not being paid by your company while in Court, travelling and parking costs and occasionally they will allow something like 5 hours research at I think £8 per hour. Later celebrate and post us the result and how much fun it was. You will wonder  why you worried about it so much. Next time will be much easier.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Smart ANPR PCN -Goose Green multi storey, Altrincham, Manchester. manchester


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1700 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi, we recently took a trip to Norway from Manchester airport and decided to arrive the day before and stop over-night near the airport.

We arrived in Manchester early so decided to drop in at Altrincham for a couple of hours.

 

We parked in the Goose Green multi storey and put on 2-3 hours we think.

this was on 6 june '19.

 

we come back from Norway and on 28 june '19

we receive a parking charge notice stating they require £100 or £60 if paid within 14 days.

 

they have photo evidence of us being there between 14:28 and 16:03 on the 6 june, which we were!

we now do not have the ticket to prove we paid so what do we do please.

 

I am currently working late shift so I can post a copy of the notice at some other time if that helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Smart ANPR PCN - Goose Green multi storey manchester

please complete this:

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi thx for the quick response;

 

this was an ANPR received in the post.

infringement was on 6/6/19. The letter is dated 25/6/19.

I received it on 28/6/19.

 

 It does NOT mention schedule4.

 

there is photographs with our start time and exit time.

 

I have not yet responded to the letter although I realise the they have given me until 24/7/19 to pay the lesser amount.

 

the parking company is Smart Parking Ltd.,

 

and the car park is Goose Green multi storey, Altrincham, Manchester.

 

The letter does not display who they are affiliated to.

 regards John

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Smart ANPR PCN -Goose Green multi storey, Altrincham, Manchester. manchester

They were late sending out the NTK so they were right not to use POFA Schedule 4. That means they cannot take the keeper to Court unless they know the keeper is also the driver. Therefore be careful not to divulge to them who the driver was. In other words just ignore them and do not contact them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so how did you pay for the parking period then?

 

Smart have got a big thing wrong so lets try and find some more. Is the place local to you as we would like to see the signs there and also piccies of the apyment machine so we can decide on what you were offered at the time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, when we have read the NTK we will see what else they have said to clai the money, the entrance signs are not offering contracts so now the blurb on the itcket machine becomes vital as that is the actual contract and agreed when you feed the meter.

No ticket from MC? What happens if you want to claim the money back for tax  or expense purposes?

Edited by ericsbrother
Link to post
Share on other sites

look at their claim, they say it is for unauthorised parking so not parking without paying or overstaying so from this one can only assume that they have no record of the payment.

 

so this means there must be a term that matches this on the sognage that offers a contract for parking because you cant breach a term that doesnt exist.

 

that means we need to see pictures of the signage and the blurb on the payment meter to determine if there was a contract offered and if so whether such a term exists and lastly how you could have breached it.

 

Now the question is whether to try and head them off by writing to them now or to let them waste their money chasing you for no purpose?

 

I would be tempted to do the latter as when you do write it will show that you arent just ignoring them but hold them in contempt where if you write now they may think that by telling some more lies you may pay up despite the fact there is no liability created to make you do so.

 

You blanked out the date and time of the alleged breach when these are the most critical points.

 

I know you have given the date and time but all of their paperwork must match up or again they fail to create any liability so please confirm the date they issued the notice as expressed on the NTK

Link to post
Share on other sites

NTK outside of 14 days as this was an ANPR capture

usual mistake for the not-so smart parking company.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as always

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good, now that is clear they are stuffed as they have no claim against the keeper and may be breaking ther law by accessing the keeper details. They have to send the NTK within 12 days after the date of the event and then have another 2 days for service if by post so anything arriving after the 21st is too late.

Dont think they will be happy to behave though so that is why we say just let them waste their money on taradiddles rather than you responding now and making them think that if they tell you another lie you will believe it and pay up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well thank you peeps for your help on this, folks taking time & trouble to run forums like this and offering free guidance is the positive side of the Internet. I will now bide my time and see what other blurb these come up with. Thanks again John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep us in the loop, the next stage will be a reminder and then probably some letters froma DCA where the bill mysteriously goes up to £160. after that Smart will threaten you with court action and that is the time to let them know that they are holding a busted flush adn you are wise to their dishonest ways.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

nothing ...whats a dca?

have you not been reading up....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

debt collector :(

 

just read someone else's case and this was quoted;

 

To illustrate your position there is the case some time ago regarding Baroness Walmsley and TFL.

 

She paid the ticket and entered the wrong registration and ended up in the High Court where it was established that it is not the purpose of the scheme to penalise those who make a genuine error.

 

A fact that should be well known to the parking companies since some of them will have lost in Court over the same situation.

 

So as I said, the GDPR breach was theirs when they asked the DVLA for your data.I have included the relevant section below .

 

This is our case exactly. What should i do, i have not yet corresponded to them and unsure what to do next.

 regards john 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is a DCA what can they do to you?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, dx100uk said:

what is a DCA what can they do to you?

 

dx

 

hi dx, i have uploaded the letter from a debt recovery firm, my acronym is made up by me lol, it sounded right at the time.

Should i wait further or respond to this? In a previous post by Ericsbrother he mentioned DCA. regards john

Edited by John_Bloggs
added info
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...