Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof? 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No    Have you had a response?  n/a 7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice'  
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
    • Evening all,   So today, I was sent an updated offer that includes the £12.60 I spent on letters, but they have declined to add the interest at £7.40. They have stating 'We acknowledge your request to claim interest to date, however, this would be at the discretion of a trial judge if the claim did proceed to a trial hearing.' I think I am content with this outcome, and pushing this to a trial for a total interest of £15.30 throughout the claim does not make sense to me.   What are people's thoughts? I am sure our courts have better things to concentrate on?
    • FFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdfFFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdf 2pages T&C,s UCM
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VCS PCN Claimform - Broomfield Developements Broomspring Close. S37XA ***Claim Dismissed***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1638 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi just received this from the bottom feeders, I know I have to acknowledge within 14 days. 

Its from 2015 so cant find the paperwork for it, but will look.

 

Parking on private development whilst visiting a friend, not displaying Permit, looked at my friends contract with private landlord, nothing in it about parking.

 

Are the Particulars of claim sufficient?

 

Thanks for any advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

would much better if you simply fill out our std sticky

then we have everything we need

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK say where the parking took place exact address/postcode and we will ahve a look on gogglespy to see what we can see from the public highway.

Now as you mention permit scheme then it is likely that the notices there are not a genuine offer of terms for parking butinstead  prohibitive such as "permit holders only". it wont matter what other rubbish they spout after those words as it becomes a matter of trespassas you didnt have a permit so nothing else applies.

If the sign says free parking for permit holders, everyone else pays £100 to a bunch of greedy cowboys then that would be legally binding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They say I was on Broomhall Developments, the car was parked on Broomspring Close.  S37XA

 

Will try get clear pics of signage.

 

Hi ericsbrother, thanks for your reply, I will send you detailed response ASAP.

 

i need to go Doc appointment.

 

 

Claimform+Pic.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Part of the POFA rules for creating a liability to pay a parking co is identifying the land they control so is there another palce of the incorrect name?

If so then photographs of the other site will prove that your vehicle cnat possibly have been there as the images they will produce wont match the background etc.

If however Bromhall developments is the name of their employer would the land in question be known by the same name for the entire development?

 

The POC is the usual rubbish and inaccurate one they cribbed from Gladstones so can be attacked in your outline defence.

 

Now I have googled Broomhall developments and they are an Irish Co that has bult a similar named housing estate in IRELAND. ther is also  a Broomhall gateway development plan for SCOTLAND but nothing in England, let alone Sheffield specifically

 

defence has to be in a fortnight after the deadline for the AOS assuming you get that in on time.

 

On google noseyneighbour I can see signs near to the parking bays that say permit holders only so unless you have a permit the signage doesnt apply to youas you would be prohibited fro parking there anyway. So with this in mind were you parked in a bay or on the road? Were you visiting or connected to the property that bay was allocated to and if so can you find out if the bay is part fo the property and noted in the deeds. If it is then it has nowt to do with VCS.

 

So you are going to grab some pictures and then you compare these to the web site of Broomhall development in ireland and that will be part fo your evidence

 

Also ask council when the Close was adopted by council as it appears to be a public highway

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tues the 9th July by 16.00pm to acknowledge service and Tues  23rd July to submit your defence...by 16.00pm

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Andy,  ericsbrother:

 

1. I think that is the name of the development as a whole, Broomhall developments, I know the Agents are Fairways, they are the letting agency, they told me so themselves.  I think thats whom employed them

 

2. There are loads of roads on the development,  Broomhall Close, is just one.

 

3. We just parked on a Bay no special one, was visiting friend on estate, their is numbers in bays.

 

4. My friend showed me their Tenancy agreement, nothing about parking.

 

5. Can you give me heads up on how to find when Broomhall Close was adopted by council, been on hold for 15 mins Amey who maintains the roads.

 

This is the same format all signs are in at present in situ on Broomhall Close. 4 in total.

Tue, 8 Jan 2019, 11_21.pdf

 

I will be sending the Acknowledgement of Service today.  Do I just send page 2. and not the N9B or N9A.

 

Thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do it on line using MCOL....all the instructions are contained within the claim pack......its free and secure...unlike post.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

follow this

you DONT send an SAR but a CPR 

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked.
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.
..
 get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
.

no need to sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Geocyper said:

Thanks for that Andy,  ericsbrother:

 

1. I think that is the name of the development as a whole, Broomhall developments, I know the Agents are Fairways, they are the letting agency, they told me so themselves.  I think thats whom employed them

 

2. There are loads of roads on the development,  Broomhall Close, is just one.

 

3. We just parked on a Bay no special one, was visiting friend on estate, their is numbers in bays.

 

4. My friend showed me their Tenancy agreement, nothing about parking.

 

5. Can you give me heads up on how to find when Broomhall Close was adopted by council, been on hold for 15 mins Amey who maintains the roads.

 

1. no it isnt. Fairways lettings agency? they dont own the site so start researching rather than guessing or making assumptions.

 

If you start with that frame of mind you give away half of the protection of the POFA as they have so far failed to identify the land and that is a winning point on its own if you use it correctly. start making things up and none of your evidence will be believed on the day.

 

Rubbish their evidence in one area and anything they say will be considered dubious unless proven 100%

 

2. are they adopted?- ask the council

 

3 the signage is prohibitive so not a genuine offer of terms- read up on it there are plenty of previous cases in the parking prasnksters blogspot.

 

4 tenacy agreement is not the document that matters you need to look at the deeds to the property- that will cost you £3 online

 

5 answered in my previous reply ASK THE COUNCIL.

 

please read and digest what people say or you will end up dropping yourself in it.

 

As for the image of a parking space with a fence behind it there is no signage attached to that location so how did the parking co draw your attention to any conditiond for parking there as their signs dont refer to your circumstance nor that place as the terms are for "designated bays". This is very specific

Link to post
Share on other sites

ericsbrother, Ok thanks, I actually spoke to Fairways, they said they were the Agents.  This is what they told me when I asked whom the site owner was.

 

I will do some research on the issues you raised.

 

I am going to take picts this afternoon off signage.

 

Thanks. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

fairways agents? so what, they are not the landowner so anything they say is irrelevant. Anyway, they wont and cant be the agents for any property that has been sold freehold.

what happened is you spoke to a company that dealt with 1 letting on the estate and have inflated that to somehting that can never be true.

 

the devil is in the detail on all of these things so get digging and get everything written down or recorded

Link to post
Share on other sites

ericsbrother,

Paid my £3 the owners of the land are BROOMHALL MANAGEMENT LTD 

(CO. Regn. No.  02784766. address 356 Meadowhead, Sheffield S8 7UJ)

 

I have a sneaky suspicion that theses may be land agents.

 

Just completed a CPR 31.14 to Vehicle Control Services Ltd, ready to be sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont forget aos on mcol website

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

residential property managers.

now that may well mean that VCS dont have a contract with anyone who actually has a say in what goes on there

 

 we still need to get to the bottom of this, the deed should be in the name of whoever your mates landlord is and going through the blurb it should say who it was bought from and that will usually be the builder/developer.

 

It will then stipulate any covenants or conditions and easments over the land or other rights held by the owner or other people.

 

Did you get the plan of the property as well as the written details?

If you didnt then you will have to pay again or phone up the relevant Land Regisrty office and ask them nicely for it using your existing reference

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ericsbrother, just emailed you copy of document, Land Title.  I have done everything now, acknowledged the claim, put in CPR request, will get up to date pictures of site today, anything else I should be doing that is urgent?

 

Thanks.

Edited by Geocyper
Bad grammar.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent the OP a message so i could see a copy of the deeds as I was confused over some of the detail expressed through this post (via an email addy I dont use for my personal stuff).

 

That is now clarified and I coud rant about how his friend's landlord has been robbed when buying his house but that wont solve any of the current problems.

 

What I will say is that the contract between the landowner and the parking co is an absolute must when it cmes to court as the land is a very small parcel of parking spaces there are not contiguous with any other land ownd by the same entity so will need signs for each and every space to be a valid notice and that isnt what is there. they will argue (untruthfully) that their signs cover the whole site but they dont have management powers over the whole site.

 

an aerial photo/plan and some coloured pencils will make it clearer what is wrong when it comes to your full defence.

 

Now the OP need to look at the deeds of the house he was visiting to see what that says about the use of its allocated parking that actually belongs to a third party. His friend needs to ask his LL or again the OP needs to spend another £3 on getting to see those deeds

Link to post
Share on other sites

we need clear pictures of the signage so we can read it and also whre you were parked some pictures of the spcae and what you can see as far as signs covering the actual parking spaces that are explicitly on the deeds you showed me. 

 

I want to see the numbers of the parking space clearly in you picture as we are talking about a possible contract with a company that owns 6 numbered parking spaces and nothing else.

 

Also pictures of any signs that are different to the one near the entrance.

 

the general sign is on land not owned  by the company named on the deeds so cant apply to the land that is.

 

Detail is the key here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He ericsbrother.

 

Ok I will do that all later (Pictures). I have looked at my friends rental agreement and there is no mention of parking.  I will pay £3/ to get copy off the deeds, property plan.  Shall I email property details to you again?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it wont be in his rental agreement, I have already said that. It will be in his landlord's lease or deeds so that is why I suggested spending another £3 having a peep unless they can be contacted to provide soem help in this ( the answer will usually be no)

 

tell us all  what it says if it mentions parking as clearly the spaces are designated by number so how that works will be important. if it isnt clear then let me have a look first and I will give the editen highlighta as above to preserve confidentiality ( yes I know it is all a public record but the owner doesnt have a dog in this fight).

 

Have a look at the council planning portal to see if you can find the original application for the whole development, there may be useful stuff in that we can use. If you cnat find it ask the council planning dept as you want to see if there are any conditions on parking laid out in the planning application or consent and also a plan of the development so your presentation on where the sigsn are andwhere the land owned by the company that owns the numbered parking spot we have identified fits in to all of this.

 

You cna then go to town with some coloured pencils to show where their signs are and the actual land they have an agreement fo is and the 2 wont be the same from what I can tell from googlespy

 

The deeds to that property will probably have enough detail on the housing immediately surrounding the plot so an A0 architects plan wont be needed on the day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ericsbrother,

 

Got registry document and layout.  the registry documents say there is a space for parking No 6 flat

Schedule of Notice of Leases, page five Number 10.

 

The title plan shows flat and parking space allocation for No 6 Flat.

I email to you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...