Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Manchester Bus lane PCN - am I a taxi or not?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1758 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received a PCN notice for using a bus lane in Manchester Oxford Street (whitworth Street West To Chepstow Street ) I seen the signs saying buses taxis & authorized vehicles only, with me being a private hire taxi I proceeded through, but then received a pcn notice I have fought it but they say I am not a taxi in the eyes of the law & quote me the police town clause act 1847 a taxi is a hackney carriage only.

can anyone give me any advice 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • honeybee13 changed the title to Manchester Bus lane PCN - am I a taxi or not?

there are limits to the jurisdiction of the council as far as hackney carraiges go and as you are from Liverpool then the limits dont apply.

Now this could mean that you can drive there as the town Clauses act doesnt apply to people outside Manchester in this respect or it could mean that only Manchester hackney carriages could ever use the road as anyone from outside cant be licensed by them even if you were drivinga  afre into the city.

I am sure that the interpretation taken will be whichever makes them the most money under the circumstances.

They havent quoted which part of the Act they rely on as earlier sections mention public carriages and only later is the specification of hackney carriages made and a sign saying taxi rather than Manchester  licensed hackney carriage is ambiguous so they should use their discretion.

my advice is to soft appeal so you can still pay the fine within the discount period if necessary

Edited by ericsbrother
Link to post
Share on other sites

In common parlance, the word “taxi” is used interchangeably to mean a private hire vehicle and a licensed hackney carriage. In law however, the word “taxi” has a specific meaning. The main body of regulations governing signs on roads in Great Britain is the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016 (TSRGD). It is those regulations that require the word “taxi” to be inserted in relevant bus lane signage where taxis are permitted. The word “taxi” is specifically defined in Schedule 1 to the TSRGD as being a vehicle licensed under section 37 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847. Such vehicles are “licensed hackney carriages”. A “private hire vehicle” is licensed under Part II of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976. It is not a “hackney carriage” and as such is not a “taxi” within the legal definition. As a licensed private hire vehicle driver Mr. ? would have known the difference between the two types of licence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, borisbeaver said:

As I understand it, this is the same issue in london between black cabs, which can be hailed and pick up fares and private hire where the fare has prebooked. Correct me if I'm wrong.

 

 

 

That's the fundamental difference between taxi and private hire, but the key issue for the OP is what the local authority says about who can use bus lanes. OP is in Manchester, but as London has been mentioned, the rule there, according to the TfL website, is:

 

"Remember, only licensed taxi drivers can drive in bus lanes - private hire vehicles are not allowed. Licensed taxi drivers should check the signs at the start of the bus lanes, however, because there are a still a number of bus lanes they cannot use"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...