Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • We have spoken to DVLA and been told to write a letter with the details. Even though there is no address available it will be on record that she is no longer the keeper and that will be backdated to the time of sale.   I'm sorry I haven't addressed your questions. It's a Mini 07 registration 70,000 miles, service history, well maintained, bodywork perfect, 2 former owners MOT  December and recently serviced. Price £1900. As far as we are aware there were no other issues apart from the small oil leak - they are claiming there is oil all over their drive but there has never been any oil on our drive. (My daughter did suggest that they might not have screwed the oil cap on properly). In fact a local garage looked at it the day before the sale and their description of the leak was 'slightly damp'. It was advertised on Gumtree and Facebook Marketplace. The advertised price was £2250. There was no smell of burning oil when they test drove, nor had there been any such smell or fumes.
    • To answer the question, no, unless they do it illegally. 
    • the differences between brexiter bull-fantasy and Remain Reality begins to bite   add in: Just a year ago she was saying in the express that Brexit would stop the EU 'stealing' our stocks 'on OUR terms', without mentioning:   * the vast majority of our catches are sold to the EU (which she should know as a fish auctioneer profiting from others work) * the effects tariffs would have * The vast majority of the fish we eat is imported * The United Nations stocks agreement * The migratory nature of the fish (sic) * Irish and Scot fishing/territorial waters if they become independent   and of course she's out of one of her income streams LOL .. but I assume her fish auction company can still auction UK catches to the EU without change ... for now   You can understand how terms like 'mummery' came into use can't you?
    • Thank you for your responses. In terms of the vehicle, it is a 2010 volkswagen crafter which I purchased for £2500. It has 160,000 miles on the clock. But for its last MOT had 260,000 miles on the clock.  The reason I didnt check these bits and Bob's is due to the fact I have only bought new previous to this and being young I guess I was naive and trusting to a certain extent or should we say inexperienced in used vehicles.   He has several Van's listed and several more at his address also. I have his address yes, I'm unsure on ownership of said property.   I have pictures of all conversations between ourselves, I also now have written confirmation from a garage in regards to the forged service history I am awaiting a call off 2 others as I type this. I am now losing an extreme amount of money per day due to not being able to work or get the money back and this is seriously affecting my health already.   Apologies if i have missed anything out there I've tried to answer as best I can.
    • Have you been in contact with the Council's Housing and Homeless Team? Also have you had a proper benefit assessment.
  • Our picks

Fringer

Defamation of character

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 211 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I was made redundant a couple of years ago, the owner of the company had closed down quote a few companies before, he wasn't paying our pensions and the company went into liquidation soon after my redundancy which meant I never got my redundancy pay from them.

I took him to tribunal and won but of course will never get anything cos the company no longer exists.

 

The owner of the company I worked for was proper dodgy and one of the reasons the company went under was that he was fraudulently uploading invoices to the factoring company for one of his biggest clients, they knew something dodgy was going on and removed all their stock, refusing to pay any more of his invoices.

This was going on whilst I was still there and a court case ensued after I had left.

I stayed in touch with the woman at the clients company.

During the case, she has given me a copy of the court papers submitted by my ex boss where he states my name and says that it was my fault that these invoices were wrong and that I was subsequently dismissed because of my errors. This is an absolute lie.

Once I saw that I requested all of my personnel records of which I now have and it clearly states that my redundancy was in no way in reflect of my performance.

My question is, can I take my ex boss to court for defamation of character? 

It is beyond belief that he is allowed to keep running companies into the ground, making people redundant and not paying them, stealing their pension contributions and getting away with it Scott free time and time again.

I don't want to sit and do nothing when I feel he is due some punishment for his wrong doings 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Defamation is very tricky and potentially very expensive. It wouldn't be on the small claims track. It would be on the multitrack which means that if you lose you can get a very serious bloody nose in terms of the other side's costs. If you win, then you will only managed to get damages if you can enforce them and you will only be able to get your costs if you can enforce those which means that if you are unable to, you will end up having to pay everything.

It seems that you're not even able to enforce a tribunal award. I'll leave you to draw the appropriate inferences as to the likelihood of your managing to enforce anything else.

Defamation must be untrue and must cause serious reputational damage. The defamatory remarks must be published and if they are simply contained in private papers then they are probably insufficiently published to amount to defamation. If they are contained in court documents which are public documents then they are unlikely also to be defamatory if they have been published in court.

Find some other way of getting even – but defamation is certainly not the way unless you really want to get involved in something risky, stressful, frustrating – and eventually probably unsuccessful


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 different issues : the false statement about you, and the poor management of his businesses.

 

For the latter, were the businesses insolvent? Little you can do on a personal level if they were, but you might get the Insolvency Service interested, and they might bar them from being a director.

 

for the false statement, since the Defamation Act 2013 the statement must not only be false but also cause (or be likely to cause) your reputation serious harm to be defamatory / actionable.

I agree with BF actions for defamation need ‘long pockets’, and run the risk of significant costs.

 

I disagree that a false statement in court papers can’t be defamatory. It isn’t Parliament where Parliamentary privilege applies. The person making the false statement might try to say “I didn’t publish it, the court did!”, but that won’t fly: in making the statement as part of a witness statement, they are publishing it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did think it would be a long shot.

Thank you for your advice 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you can sue the ex-boss but it will cost you a small fortune to do so and he is unlikely to have any assets that you can go after- everything will be in his cat's name.

Pyrrhic victory is the term.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...