Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
    • Well naturally if you want to maintain your outrage, and retain something to bitch about, then arguing about the level of your fixed monthly DD is the way to go. You are of course perfectly free to ignore the easy solution.
    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Prescription Penalty Notice.....


Razorback
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1765 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, am new here and it seems a helpful forum. I am hoping you can help me.

 

I have tried to search the forum, but cannot find a previous topic like mine.

 

Basically, I have today received an NHS Penalty notice through the post relating to a prescription item from my doctor.

 

To cut a long story short, I get one item every month from my doctor, on repeat prescription. I am exempted from paying for this item and have been so for a lot of years.

However, after going to the doctors last month, she added another (new) item for something else to my monthly repeat prescription.

 

So, when I went to collect it from Boots, I explained I had to pay for the new item added onto my prescription and then signed the back for the normal (exempted) item. All I got was a till receipt for the paid for item, which I later binned and thought nothing more about it.

 

However today, I have received a penalty charge notice relating to this new item (which I did pay for).

 

How do I go about disputing this penalty notice, as I no longer have the receipt.  

 

Many thanks.

Edited by Razorback
Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy,

 

I did read through a lot of them before I posted. Most, if not all seem to be about people having claimed an exemption when the NHS believe the prescription should have been paid for.

 

Mine is a bit the other way around.

 

I paid for one item on the prescription (and claimed exemption for the other item on the prescription). It is the paid one that they are saying I didn't pay for (when I did). I don’t have an FP?? receipt that they are saying I should have asked for.

 

However that FP?? receipt only seems to be for claiming back the cost of items paid for when an exemption should have applied. I paid for the one item, because I have to pay for it – there is no exemption for this item.

 

In the absence of a receipt, would a bank statement showing a debit card transaction at Boots on the day in question suffice? The trouble is I also bought something else over the counter, so the debit card amount is for £14.10? I suppose the NHS could say it proves I spent £14.10 in Boots that day but doesn’t prove it was for the Prescription item!

 

The trouble is also since this incident, I received another repeat prescription, again with one exempt item and one ‘to pay for item’ which I collected last week. Again, I paid for one of the items and signed the back for the other item (although it did cause some confusion in Boots this time, but they let me do it). Fortunately I kept the till receipt this time, but no doubt will receive another penalty notice about this one.

 

Thanks.

 

 

Edited by Razorback
paragraphing
Link to post
Share on other sites

How are you exempt for one item but not the other on the same prescription ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Andyorch said:

How are you exempt for one item but not the other on the same prescription ?

 

Hello,

 

My exemption certificate only covers me for prescriptions for my accepted disability (War Pension Exemption).

 

Thus, any prescriptions for any other conditions I have to pay for.

 

The newly prescribed medication isn't connected to my War Pension disability, hence I paid for it.

 

Thanks.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add further after speaking with Boots just now.

 

Apparently, my type of exemption is the only one that doesn’t apply ‘across the board’ for all prescribed medication.

 

The problem, it seems, is that it the actual NHS prescription form is not ‘set up’ to deal with this. It expects people to be either ‘totally exempt’ or ‘not exempt’.

 

Thus, when I legitimately signed the back of the form for my one exempt item (and paid for the other), the NHS treat my prescription as being ‘totally exempt’ and thus subject to their checking. Hence it has been picked up by them.

 

The pharmacist at Boots did say that the lady who served me shouldn’t have allowed me to both sign and pay for items on the same script. So, they are in error in permitting me to do it!

 

Surely, I cannot be at fault here, if the form doesn’t cater for my circumstances? At the end of the day, I paid for what I should have paid for (and was correctly exempted for the war pensionable item).

 

Hence the NHS is not ‘out of pocket’ in any way.  So why should I have to pay a penalty charge?

Edited by Razorback
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't help with your existing problem re penalties - sorry.

 

To stop this happening again you need to ask your GP always to do two prescriptions for you - one for the exempt medication and a second one for the other.  Make sure they understand why you need to have it done this way.  (And check they've done it when you collect the prescription).

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're worried about their "penalty" charge, don't be, I had two in the space of three months due to incorrect advice from the pharmacist,  I went on line and paid for the script and ignored their £100 charge, or whatever amount it was they were trying to fleece off me.

 

Short of a couple of letters increasing the charge for not paying them within their arbitrary time limits I've not heard a peep out of them.

  • Like 2

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Manxman in exile said:

Can't help with your existing problem re penalties - sorry.

 

To stop this happening again you need to ask your GP always to do two prescriptions for you - one for the exempt medication and a second one for the other.  Make sure they understand why you need to have it done this way.  (And check they've done it when you collect the prescription).

 

 

The trouble is I don't see the actual prescription form until I collect the medication in Boots as it is sent to them electronically.

 

I will ask at the doctors if they can send the two items on seperate scripts though.

 

Many thanks.

Edited by Razorback
Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, honeybee13 said:

Razor, I don't suppose you have a Boots loyalty card that would show you paying for the contested item?

 

HB

 

Hi,

 

Yes I have the Boots loyalty card, but it cannot be used for precriptions, hence it won't show on there, but thanks anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Razorback said:

 

 

The trouble is I don't see the actual prescription form until I collect the medication in Boots as it is sent to them electronically.

 

I will ask at the doctors if they can send the two items on seperate scripts though.

 

Many thanks.

 

Ha!  I had the opposite problem with electronic prescriptions.  I made one request for a repeat with three different meds, and the GP sent three separate prescriptions to the pharmacy, which arrived at different times.  I ended up making three separate journeys to the pharmacy.  I then reverted to collecting the prescriptions myself.  (I live within five minutes walk of both my GP surgery and the pharmacy).

 

Ask the doctors to use separate prescriptions and explain why you need that.  Make sure it's recorded on your notes so whichever doctor deals with your repeats will know what's required.

 

Personally I would not ignore a penalty notice - I'd try to get it sorted out as you are doing.  You might just get away with explaining it as you have done here - ie the surgery mistakenly put two meds (one exempt, one not) on the same prescription and the prescription form doesn't provide for this situation.  Say you paid for the non-exempt one.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...