Oh my lord
My son got a new car to replace the pone that engine seized
However on Wednesday we had freezing fog and when he out his foot on the brake the car did nothing but slide abs never kicked in and he hit the back of a car (all on dash cam) and airbags didn't got off so...
He calls his insurance and they have asked does he want to claim for his car to be repaired or not.
Checked and his car was on a recall for abs may 2006- may 2008 his first registered on 1st of September and on speaking to Audi they want it in to check it and fault find well there is definitely a problem with air bags !
Question 1. what does the insurance mean about him claiming for repairs or just paying out the third party?
Question 2. Anyone know the procedure if car goes back to Audi?
I am trying to follow your advice in post 21 which suggests the kennels T&Cs are over ruled by the CRA
As I understood it , even if the kennel felt they good reason to refuse the dog boarding, which would be a difficult point to argue , as I am unable to get the vet to confirm they said the dog “should “ be ok ,the most the kennel would be entitled to would be reasonable admin expenses due to refusing to accept the dog .
Then I read in you last post , which to me seems a contradiction .
Paragraph 3 suggests a Judge would favour the kennel and its stance ,then paragraph 4 says to deny a refund in unenforceable .
Surely if to deny me a refund is unenforceable at common law , then a Judge would have to rule in my favour .
So if I continue I need to be sure I am citing the correct sections of the CRA
To clear this up !This new ccj claim from cabot/Mortimer is for a bank i have no account with.And is obviously trying to make out my older debt is not statute barred.They think i will respond and start the six years all over again for a totally diferent debt.
I have no debt with the bank they are claiming against me with.
Do people not understand this?