Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi   With a SAR all you have to do is ask for 'ALL DATA' (this way it does not matter what format they hold that data whether it be digital, email, telephone calls (recorded), written etc).   They then have 30 Days to comply once they have acknowledged your SAR Request (that is unless they require ID Verification) which the 30 Days time limit does not start until they have verified your ID if requested)   Also can I add in DHL response in post#36 I hate it when any Company/Business etc. has the nerve to use the get out clause of 'Human Error'.    This is not the case as it was 'Maladministration' by DHL' not 'Human Error' as stated to you, irrespective of who/which employee of DHL made the 'Human Error' the buck stops with DHL as who/which employee made that error was Employed by DHL.
    • pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform. [if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] .  register as an individual  note the long gateway number given  then log in .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform .  defend all  leave jurisdiction unticked   goto the defence filing section  file the following:     1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).  2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.  . If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant. .  3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC]  or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied. .. ..ends..   dx          
    • I passed on the article and link to friend. Between us we will now try get the required info to the correct location so that they (whoever in the Govt) can sort out what he is owed. I will keep you updated.  This thread may help others in similar situations. Ethel Street - very helpful research.  Thank you.  Seems like you came up trumps!
    • numerous erudio/drydens claimform threads here already - use our search top right.   your appears to be statute barred as you've never heard of erudio so would not have deferred since your last direct deferment to SLC in 2013    if you wish to bother to even send CCA/CPR that's upto you but the bottom line is to erudio you've ignored everything to date yoy might also ignore a claimform.   but ofcourse you are not!!   if the above is true   pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform. [if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] .  register as an individual  note the long gateway number given  then log in .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform .  defend all  leave jurisdiction unticked   goto the defence filing section  file the following: 1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).  2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.  . If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant. .  3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC]  or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied. .. ..ends..   dx      
    • Well I would want my £50 back also but hey ho if your satisfied its been resolved.....there was no way you could ever be liable anyway as your contract was with TC not RC.   Thread title updated.   Andy
  • Our picks

barafear799

Hoist Claim Form - TSB Lloyd trustcard Credit Card debt

Recommended Posts

I'm not a lawyer but if that case went to the appeal court and was upheld that it can be used as precedence by the lower courts can't it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it can be used by the lower courts BUT ...as SR said, it's [p'haps] relevant.....

 

i added p'hap's as you need to point out it's not in your case, the date of your agreement pre dates carey and the carey case is not retrospective to pre apr 2007 CCA act changes. this is an important point you need to make amongst the others about carey.

they always throw carey into the mix where they don't have the required paperwork and know it,

 

in your case they must produce the signed agreement for court enforcement regardless to the fact that, poss, under carey, what they have produced might be compliant under the consumer credit act . two totally different things.

  • Like 1

..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My only fear DX is that I have lost a case a couple of years ago relating to a loan agreement from 2003 and their solicitor quoted Carey case to the judge and it was used against me - that time they used a reconstituted agreement for the loan agreement. 

Clearly, that judge did not accept that because my agreement was pre-2007 made it exempt from the Carey judgment.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they included or mentioned Carey anywhere in this process so far?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No not at all. As I said in an earlier post, I'm not even sure if they've used the word "reconstituted" in their WS. But clearly the "t&c" (7 pages) have been added to the "signed application form" at a later date, because they were not included when I first got my response to my CPR/CAA request letters. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok... it's pretty simple then - the agreement doesn't comply with s.61(1), so is neither properly executed nor enforceable through the courts, by virtue of CCA s.127(3). If they don't bring Carey into it then they cannot rely on it later. Maybe that's what DX was alluding to.

 

Edit to add: admittedly, the use of Carey to support a Claimant's case when they're relying on a recon for enforcement is totally wrong. You should be able to bat it off if you're wise to it.

Edited by shamrocker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry....that's because hippo asked the question and I didn't see it wasn't the op....

random questions are p'haps better asked on one's own thread...………………..:frusty:


..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dx100uk said:

sorry....that's because hippo asked the question and I didn't see it wasn't the op....

random questions are p'haps better asked on one's own thread...………………..:frusty:

 

I was actually referring to your post from last night, DX. i.e. if they're not relying on Carey themselves then don't do them any favours by introducing it for them. 👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am leaving this rather late - let's hope the court has some leniency as I am a lay person defending myself - and also Christmas post.

The address I have for the court is a PO Box Number. But clearly, I know where the court is - as it is in my home town - does this mean I can or cannot "post in person"? I tried to phone them up to ask the question - found I was no.36 in the queue and gave up!! 

Clearly, the general judgment/order does not ask for me to send a copy to claimant - so is it ok to just send it to the court? 

 

Ok, uploaded first attempt. Some advice as to what to add or remove much appreciated. 

Thanks so far for all the valuable advice.

 

I'm also planning on attaching a copy of the illegible form that the claimant has provided - just so that it emphasises it when the judge looks at it. Is that ok?

 

 

witness statement_Hoist_Dec2019_REDACT.pdf

Edited by barafear799
typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you can hand it in to the court .

 

i'll look later.

 

dx


..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers.

 

Is it ok to stick in their letterbox? I cannot be there in person during their opening times. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Judgments on Permission to Appeal applications dont usually set precedent.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its not a formal defence - its a witness statement as required by the courts N157 you got.

 

5. hoist and rway are the same company

 

the rest until 9 is not really relevant to a WS and is somewhat meaningless.

but everything else onward is very good

dx


..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx...please see #66 for what has been ordered. Clearly states Formal Defence

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a formal defence as I've already explained...not a witness statement.....the claim has yet to be allocated.

 

Edit your statement of truth...its not a witness statement

 


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Andyorch said:

Its a formal defence as I've already explained...not a witness statement.....the claim has yet to be allocated.

 

Edit your statement of truth...its not a witness statement

 

 

Andy - presumably, Barafear will be given the opportunity to expand upon the points made in the formal defence by way of a conventional witness statement later?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, barafear799 said:

Any advice on my defence please?

Thanks.

 

I think you could say much of that in a quarter of the words, and also achieve more impact.

 

I suppose you were under the impression that it was a witness statement of sorts - I wasn't sure myself tbh.

 

Has Andy advised further back as to the sort of detail you need to include here, and whether you're responding directly to the claimant's WS?

 

Hopefully he'll pop in and clarify it at some point if he hasn't already.

I haven't got time to go reading back through everything right now.

 

You shouldn't really need to write a huge amount to get the key arguments across though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes sorry I got confused as well , I don't think it needs to be too detailed as that will surely be better saved for the WS? don't want to give away whats wrong too early..:lol: they'll have time to conjure up fake stuff again then.


..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming the court does not dispense with Notice of Allocation then yes....a witness statement will have to be submitted at a later stage (after allocation) so even though its a formal defence some points should be retained for later and not all the hand disclosed at this stage.

 

The formal defence should simply respond to the pleaded particulars...with a little more detail than an initial defence but not as in depth as a witness statement.Bear in mind though...thats assuming the court directs that witness statements are submitted...the claimant has already provided a statement even though not ordered to...so they have showed all their hand in advance.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy

 

Can you advise as to whether what I am proposing to provide is sufficient, too much or too little (unlikely).

I will have to finalise whatever I need today.

 

Many thanks

B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a bit waffly and could really be stripped to 1 page...but covers most if not all of the points required.Payments and statements and assignment are irrelevant if you cant produce a copy of of the executed agreement.Anyway.......

 

Replace point 3 with the following.....

 

3. In accordance with District Judes xxxxx Order dated xxxxxx the claimants although not ordered to opted to submit a witness statement which states in its intro that it mostly relies on hearsay evidence as confirmed by the draftsperson in the opening paragraph. It is my understanding that they must serve notice to any hearsay evidence pursuant to CPR 33.2(1)(B) (notice of intention to rely on hearsay evidence) and Section 2 (1) (A) of the Civil Evidence Act.

 

And your summary point 9 could be beefed up ..why not conclude with.....

 

Summary

 

19. In an attempt to comply with  the courts  Order dated xxxxxx the cliamants have failed and can only produce an illegible application form with a set of unconnected terms and conditions.

It is impossible to reconstitute a copy of an agreement from 1998 and therefore the claimant remains in default of my section 78 request and therefore the agreement doesn't comply with s.61(1) a, so is neither properly executed nor enforceable through the courts, by virtue of CCA s.127(3). Although the claimants statement tries to make up for weakness in disclosure it relies heavily on the balance of probabilities and padding it still lacks the basic requirements of the Consumer Credit Act  legislation required to enforce any agreement..

 

Therefore  by reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the help and advice so far.

 

Given I'd left things rather to the last minute, I attempted to hand deliver my letter to the court (in the evening on drive home from work) - but no letter box at court to deliver letter (the actual address is a PO Box). 

Fortunately, I managed to get someone to hand it in the next day (last Thursday) during the day - so hopefully it's ended up on the right desk. 

 

I await the next stage. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...