Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the OP follows king’s advice and then the neighbour’s roof leaks, who do you think the neighbour will blame? a) the dodgy “roofers” (who will be long gone), b) the OP for “damaging a perfectly good repair” (even if they don’t damage it, and it wasn’t a good repair!), or c) someone else   King may be technically correct, but the OP following their advice isn’t likely to end well if the neighbour is already ‘difficult’. 
    • I sent a SAR. which also provided a copy of proof of ID, last month to Northumbrian Water, and received no reply whatsoever.   After the 30 day deadline passed i sent off a complaint form to the ICO and sent a letter of claim to NW for breach of statutory duty. (As up until today they had failed to respond in any way to the request that was made)   Today i received a reply saying the my ID wasn't in the standard format and they could not accept it,   (The exact same copy of ID has not been an issue before and the exact same image was accepted perfectly fine by a previous energy company i SAR'd), and that they required i give them 2 forms of I.D, 1 from list A and from List B Along with questioning the alternative address like i mentioned above.   I wanted the request to be sent to the alternate address, as i work full time and i'm not always at my home address, i'd most likely not be in at a time when it can be delivered and can't get to the delivery office easily enough before it would be returned back undelivered. (Which i wanted to avoid happening again as this happened to the last SAR i made.) The address is my partner's address, where i regularly go and who also works from home and wouldn't have issues receiving/collecting mail.
    • yes they are entitled to query...GDPR applies   full story please don't play secret squirrel        
    • Hi,   I received a reply from a SAR I sent today (This was only after I sent a Letter of Claim as the company failed to reply or acknowledge the SAR in any way, though that deserves its own thread)    In the SAR I asked for my request to be sent to an alternate address, In the response they asked for clarification as to why I requested this.    Provided that the company has been given enough proof and information to verify my identity would I need to provide this reason for them to process my request? 
    • Following a six month battle with a supplier concerning the purchase of a faulty item which resulted in the submission of a case to money claims on-line & mediation, an agreed settlement was reached & part of the settlement involved me having to arrange, return & pay the necessary charges to return the faulty item to the supplier/manufacturer. On receipt of the item they would within seven days refund the agreed settlement figure together with the costs of the postal/courier fees.     A contract was taken out with Parcel Force on line, 24 hour express delivery according to the information that is given when entering into this contract, the customer will receive up to date tracking of their parcel together with a message alert when the parcel reaches its destination.   Parcel was picked up as promised   when checking the tracking some 24 hours later the parcel had still not been delivered nor had the tracking.   A number of telephone calls were made to Parcel Force where I was told that my Parcel was at the National Hub but had been delayed due to a malfunction & could I check back later that evening.     Following morning I checked the tracking & it still read the same.   Following several telephone calls I have been informed that they are unable to confirm whether the parcel has been lost,   the exact location of the parcel & whether it will be delivered.     I submitted a claim on line to Parcel Force on the morning of 19th June & to my astonishment when checking the status of the claim a number of hours later have discovered that they have closed my claim.     Status says rejected - claim passed to online team.     Due to the situation of this parcel having to reach its destination as soon as possible I want to pursue this matter via a money claim online process.   I would also like to add that I did not take out an insurance with Parcel Force as I naturally & genuinely assumed that they would fulfil their contract & deliver the parcel as promised.     I feel that I am being given the runaround every time I speak to them   am very keen to commence action against them as soon as possible.     Any advice would be gratefully received & sorry for the long winded post.  
  • Our picks

    • My personal experiences of Future Comms 
      Don't touch them owe me £500 since January 2019 make excuse after excuse. Seem they always have software problems sending money out. Keep saying they will call back or email nothing been chasing it now for 6 mths the phone staff always have the same banter we will chase it up and get back to you then nothing!
      • 0 replies
    • Future Comms is a Big Con. How to get out of it. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/417058-future-comms-is-a-big-con-how-to-get-out-of-it/
        • Thanks
      • 4 replies
    • Future Comms issues. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416504-future-comms-issues/
      • 5 replies
    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies

3 Store Refusing Replaceement with 30 days and GDPR Breach

Recommended Posts

I recently upgraded my 3 Contract to a new phone which developed a problem.


I contacted 3 and was initially told to speak to the manufacturer.

They advised that as I was in the 30 day period of Consumer Rights Act 2015 to request a replacement that I go to the store to arrange this as it would offer a faster resolution.


I agreed with this course of action and went to the store on day 29.

Leaving it late admittedly due to health issues.


When I arrived at the store the Assistant Manager then gave just about every excuse under the sun about being able to help but because the policy was 28 days not 30 they could not help me.


I countered this with CRA 2015 being 30 days and they refused to accept this so I asked for the policy in writing.

We both looked on the 3 store website but embarrassingly enough for them it didn't state anything about faulty goods.


The actual wording in the contract that I signed says "Refer to three.co.uk/returns" for the Full Policy which doesn't explain anything about replacement faulty goods.


I know why... Because it's the legal requirement of 30 days...

Store Manager being adamant the period for returns was 28 days refused to back down


I asked him to look up CRA 2015 which they declined saying "It's not my job to know the law" …

Of course if you're selling goods and services and are a manager you should be versed in CRA 2015.


Realising they weren't getting me to fold my argument they requested a colleague get a copy of the policy from the back room.

When they returned it was very clear the document they were about to show me was the signed contract of another customer.


Consequently I called this out and said "Don't show me that, that's someone else's personal data" which they seemed to take offence at and said I was just trying to give them a hard time.


They went on to justify saying that what they were trying to show me had no personal data despite initials and a signature being clearly visible.

I again instructed they take the document away from me.


The wording was so small that the only way for me to read it would be to have actually taken the document to look at it.

The ultimate irony is that policy in this other customers document would be irrelevant because that's not the document I signed.


Realising I was getting palmed off and probably being labeled as toxic I decided to leave, but not before writing his name down and sending off a blunt tweet to 3...


Needless to say I'm not too impressed,

£16.55 out of pocket for a train ticket,

probably going to need to return to the store again and having to put up with a broken phone either for 2 weeks

(If manufacturer deal with this) or having to fight an outside 30 day period.


Tweet Sent...

But not sure how I should approach that GDPR issue...


So desperate to prove a point the manager didn't have he throws all regards to another customers data out the window?


When does my bad luck ever end...

This is how I spend most of my life :ranger:

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you won't think I'm being too tough if I say that you've been here since 2012 and so you must know your rights under the Consumer Rights Act which are that if a fault manifests itself within the first 30 days then you are in principle entitled to a refund or a replacement. You would also be aware that you have to assert this right so I'm pleased to say that you will already have made sure that the shop has evidence that you did come to them on day 29 and tried to assert your right. On that basis it is simply a question of pushing the issue and if necessary taking legal action to enforce the right.

Also, you've been here since 2012 so I'm not too sure why you haven't told us who the dealer is – maybe you would do that now.

Also, should be aware that the responsibility/liability lies with the dealer and has nothing to do with the manufacturer regardless of what any document says.

Are we on the same page here?

By the way, I have no idea why you should be concerning yourself with GDPR. This is an extremely minor issue and I would have thought that you would be concerned with getting your telephone sorted out.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

No not too tough at all, I think I just used a bad way of writing this out. Indeed I'm well versed in CRA 2015 and thought my post would allude to that. But maybe I didn't write it very clearly so my apologies for that there. This was more a documentary style posting than a request for help so I'm sorry for any confusion on that point.


I was also more documenting this issue mainly for my own recollection at a later point but also for those who may be told the same in another Three store. I'm sorry if I didn't make any of this clear. The store is Hutchinson 3G Limited or Three as they are better known: http://three.co.uk/


I did a web chat with 3 while waiting for my train home who also confirmed the policy from the store manager was wrong and that it is 30 days to return a faulty handset for a replacement and not 28. On learning this I made the conversation a complaint that I was being given incorrect information on multiple occasions. I had attempted to get this issue resolved in a different store the previous week where they changed the SIM Card for me. CRA 2015 was not discussed at this point and was told if that didn't work then to call 333 from the handset. Again I knew this was wrong but took the replacement SIM card in good faith as it may very well have resolved the issue. Unfortunately it didn't.


I then contacted Three again and was palmed off to the manufacturer. The manufacturer accepted my case but suggested me going back to Three under CRA 2015. I today went to assert that right and was told both the manufacturer and Three Customer Service were wrong. I remained calm and asked for proof that I had been in the store today. Manager just gave me his name and I made a note of the time I was there and pointed to a CCTV camera in case a SAR would become necessary if Three tried to suggest otherwise.


As it happens I received a phone call after registering my complaint from the lady in the webchat with Three who had spoken with her manager and confirmed the store was wrong, that she could also see I was given incorrect information on a number of occasions and that under no circumstances should the store have given me a document with another customers details on. She went on to confirm that she had arranged a replacement handset was being couriered to my home address next week and that it would be a drop and swap type replacement. I accepted this, Just as I was about to explain the wasted journey costs the agent said she was waiving 1 month bill charges for the inconvenience caused.


So seems a resolution is very well on the way. I'll update this as resolved once I have the new handset and bill credit in my hands.

This is how I spend most of my life :ranger:

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...