Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lowell claimform - old o2 mobile phone debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1633 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell portfolio

 

Date of issue – 21/05/20

 

 

Have till 23rd june?

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

1)The Defendant entered into an agreement with 02 (uk) Ltd under account reference XXXXXXXXXX ('the agreement')

2) The defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated.

3) The agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 31/08/2016 and notice was given to the defendant.

4) Despite repeated requests for payment the sum of £212 remains due and outstanding.

and the claimant claims

a) The said sum of £212

b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of Issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.047 but limited to one year being £16.98

c) costs

 

What is the total value of the claim? £229

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC ( Pre Action Protocol) ? no

 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? no

 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a


Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? mobile phone

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? after

 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? branch

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/ Equifax /Etc...) ? pretty sure it does my credit was adversely affected but i cant see my full report

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. debt purchaser or collection agency (lowell)

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? no

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? i dont know

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? i have had a couple of letters but have no idea what they said

 

Why did you cease payments? because it was an all inclusive tarrif with no limits then one month they tried to bill for £200 in one month for texts that are unlimited

 

What was the date of your last payment? I dont know im afraid

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? yes

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? no

 

i have read another similar thread and assume i take the following action:

  • pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
  • register as an individual
  • note the long gateway number given
  • then log in
  • select respond to a claim and select the AOS box.
  • then using the details required from the claimform
  • defend all
  • leave jurisdiction unticked.
  • click thru to the end
  • confirm and exit MCOL.
  • get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

 

Obviously any help anyone can offer is gratefully received! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to County court claim form received - lowell chasing old mobile phone debt

Friday 21st June by 4.00pm  ....23rd is a Sunday

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR 31.14 already requests that...point 5

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

@misterman35 All I can say is that you need to move to Scotland. We have much fairer laws here. This information may not be of much help to you, and I apologise for that, but urge your local politicians to look at this. Afterall, we did do away with 'workhouses' a long time ago. It is about time the England, NI and Wales crept into the future IMHO. 

Bear in mind, that they cannot extract blood from a stone - if you have nothing, they cannot take anything. Do not be scared!

Tom.. Xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I received a response from Lowell, it is as follows:

 

we confirm receipt of your letter dated 23rd May 2019.

 

please find enclosed a copy of the Notice of Assignment as requested.  we have requested a copy of the statement from the original creditor and this will be forwarded to you upon receipt.

 

Your debt relates to a former telecommunications matter which is not regulated by the consumer credit act 1974.  This means thatthe original creditor is not required to retain a copy of the agreement and therefore we are unable to request a copy of this document.  a default notice is a formal letter which is sent to a customer when they fail to maintain payments on their credit agreement.  Mobile phones accounts have a service agreement and therefore a default notice will not have been issued as it only applies to credit agreements.

 

We can confirm that we have received your acknowledgement of service.  Pease ensure you respond to the claim as you deem appropritae within the time scales set out by the court.

 

The account remains on hold to allow time for the original creditor to provide us with requeasted documents.  Failure to respond to the claim could result in a county court judgement (CCJ) in default being entered, which would add extra costs to the balance.

 

If you wish to speak with a member of our team please telephone etc.

 

Im guessing I now just need to sit tight and wait to see what else they can or cant produce?

 

Any input on what to do next would be most gratefully received.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not too tight......Defence Friday 21st June by 4.00pm

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for commenting.

 

I suppose I should just hope they can muster something up next week, if they cant/wont then do you think this will prejudice their side of things?  Its not unreasonable what I have asked for and without it is like hearsay that I owe them some money.....

 

also they have registered this debt on my credit reference file and would love to have this removed, im guessing if the case is awarded in my favour I can request this be removed?

 

anyway, thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

they didn't register the debt

a DCA cant do that

the original company did. Lowell purchased it= name change

 

there are 100's of like mobile claimform threads here with the relevant defence to adapt

use the google search box here

 

mobile claimform

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im thinking of phoning O2 myself to get the details of the bill, is this a wise move or should I wait for lowell/o2 to respond?

 

I am conscious that the clock is ticking with a week left to file a defence.

 

Also if I lose and am ordered to pay does this mean I get a CCJ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only if you cant pay the full amount within the time limit stated....o2 may divulge or pass it over now its been assigned.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes ofcourse you can phone o2

but as this debt is made of monthly charges till end of contract that you couldn't use as the service was disconnected which Ofcom state are unfair.

it might be better to file our mobile holding/no paperwork defence that outlines all this?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

thanks for such a quick response, I am very grateful!!! :)

 

I will go and take a look at mobile holding/no paperwork defence.

 

Just curious, does anyone know if I lose and pay does this mean the default note on my credit file stays but says settled or does it get removed?  I read somewhere that if I were to pay then it stays, but says settled , for another 6 years from the date I settle....

 

anyway, thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Default markers stay for a period of 6 years irrespective of a CCJ or not....a CCJ will show for a further 6 years if not paid on time.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No..... default markers have no connection to court claims...irrespective if you win or lose...a default marker must be placed and shown on your files for a period of 6 years as per the ICO and DPA guidelines.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Afraid not...but its not clear when the default was placed..you dont know the date of your last payment or when the marker was placed ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I checked my credit reference file and the marker was placed July 2016. 

 

The correspondence from Lowell they sent after my CPR 31.14  request says O2 closed an account on 29/01/16 and lowell took over the debt 31/08/16.

 

i still havent seen the statement from O2 on how they concocted the figure they claim I owe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then o2 placed the marker as the original creditor and it has 3 further years to show before it will drop off.

 

Claimants do not disclose their evidence until after you have submitted a defence...and the claim has  been allocated to your local court for hearing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, ok, thanks.

 

I was waiting for them to send me a statement as they said they have requested a copy from O2 and would forward it to me upon receipt.

 

I am still tempted to call o2 and request a copy myself, I was on a monthly recurring agreement with unlimited calls etc. so have no idea how the cost could possibly spiral to £200+  I am guessing this would form a big part of my defence....

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They say that in every claim...its a template response...you wont get anything before your defence is due...so the more groundwork you do now the more chance your defence will be accurate.Its always advisable to submit a holding defence that puts the claimant to strict proof of disclosure as an initial defence.Then as the case unfolds you will be given more information the claimant relies upon...if they have it...or if it proceeds that far.

 

On mobile claims they dont normally expect a defence and hope for a default judgment...so normally run for the hills when they have to back their claim up with the corresponding documents.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...