Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for that "read me", It's a lot to digest, lots of legal procedure. There was one thing that I was going to mention to you,  but in one of the conversations in that thread it was mentioned that there may be spies on the Forum,  this is something that I've read quite some time ago in a previous thread. What I had in mind was to wait for the thirty days after their reply to my CCA request and then send the unenforceable letter. I was hoping that an absence of signature could be the Silver Bullet but it seems that there are lot of layers to peel on this Onion.  
    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
    • Paragraph 23 – "standard industry practice" – put this in bold type. They are stupid to rely on this and we might as well carry on emphasising how stupid they are. I wonder why they could even have begun to think some kind of compelling argument – "the other boys do it so I do it as well…" Same with paragraph 26   Paragraph 45 – The Defendants have so far been unable to produce any judgements at any level which disagree with the three judgements…  …court, but I would respectfully request…   Just the few amendments above – and I think it's fine. I think you should stick to the format that you are using. This has been used lots of times and has even been applauded by judges for being meticulous and clear. You aren't a professional. Nobody is expecting professional standards and although it's important that you understand exactly what you are doing – you don't really want to come over to the judge that you have done this kind of thing before. As a litigant in person you get a certain licence/leeway from judges and that is helpful to you – especially if you are facing a professional advocate. The way this is laid out is far clearer than the mess that you will get from EVRi. Quite frankly they undermine their own credibility by trying to say that they should win simply because it is "standard industry practice". It wouldn't at all surprise me if EVRi make you a last moment offer of the entire value of your claim partly to avoid judgement and also partly to avoid the embarrassment of having this kind of rubbish exposed in court. If they do happen to do that, then you should make sure that they pay everything. If they suddenly make you an out-of-court offer and this means that they are worried that they are going to lose and so you must make sure that you get every penny – interest, costs – everything you claimed. Finally, if they do make you an out-of-court offer they will try to sign you up to a confidentiality agreement. The answer to that is absolutely – No. It's not part of the claim and if they want to settle then they settle the claim as it stands and don't try add anything on. If they want confidentiality then that will cost an extra £1000. If they don't like it then they can go do the other thing. Once you have made the amendments suggested above – it should be the final version. court,. I don't think we are going to make any more changes. Your next job good to make sure that you are completely familiar with it all. That you understand the arguments. Have you made a court familiarisation visit?
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote... as has already been said, they use their own criteria. if a person is not stated as linked to you on your file then no cant hurt you. not all creditors use every CRA provider, there are only 3 main credit file providers mind, the rest are just 3rd party data sharers. if you already have revolving credit on your file there is no need to apply for anything just 'because' you need to show you can handle money. if you have bank account(s) and a mortgage which you are servicing (paying) then nothing more can improve your score, despite what these 'scam' sites claiml  its all a CON!!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

SSL/moriarty Claimform - old money in advance PDL***Claim Discontinued***


safc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1632 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

a quick question for a friend who is not to bright 

 

a payday loan from a company called money in advance was sold to a dca and apparently a notice of assignement was received 

 

a pap pack got sent and my freind filled it in

got back a load of bumf 

a reconstituted credit agreement

copy of a notice of assisgnement

and terms and conditions 

 

a court claim has now been issued  dated 13th  may 2019

 

this person can not recollect a default notice being issued by mia 

but 3 months after the notice of assignment he recieved a default notice from the debt buyer  by post and email

 

im told in the poc on front of claim form there is no mention of a default notice but other details match correctly 

 

what im trying to answer him after searching around the net

does a default notice have to have been served by the original creditor before being sold  or if there was not one issued by oc can the debt byuer default him and then take a court claim 

 

does a default notice have to be mentioned in a poc 

 

thanks if you know what i mean 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

please complete this:

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ?sll capitol

 

Date of issue – 20/05/2019

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 

 

1.the defendant owes the claimant £657.10 under a regulated loan agreement with money in advance ltd dated  25/07/ 2013 which was assigned to claimant on 12/05/2014 and notice of which was given to the defendant on  12/05/2014  (debt)


2.despite formal demand for payment of the debt the defendant has failed to pay.

 

3.and the claimant claims £657.10
and further claims interest there on pursuant to section 69  of the county court act  1984 limited to one year to the date hereof at  the rate of 8.00% per annum amounting to £52.56

 

What is the total value of the claim? unsure about £600

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC ( Pre Action Protocol) ?  yes

 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? no

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? PDL

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? after

 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? on line

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/ Equifax /Etc...) ?  no what im told

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. debt purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? yes

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? not what im told  no

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? no

 

Why did you cease payments?  after loan was taken out  2013 or no payments were made freind is unsure 

 

What was the date of your last payment? as above

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? no

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to SSL Capital Claimform - old money in advance PDL

urm 1st time I can see SSL have ever issued a claimform on CAG 

 

loan was from june 2013 so not SB'd.

 

and yes a debt must be defaulted to litigate

and no the debt buyer cannot do that only the OC can default you.

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked.
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.
.
 get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/
.
type your name ONLY

no need to sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]
 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok a  cpr 31.14  will get sent to morty law  the solictor on the form 

 

will just the same documents get sent again which were already received,

copy  of agreement,

copy of assignment,

copy of terms 

or will they say they have already been sent once 

 

regards to a default notice 

there is no  mention of a  default on this persons noddle credit report 

 

could this account have been sold as live when money in advance went into administration and then sll did a default notice 

Link to post
Share on other sites

this didn't show due to a spelling mistake in my search

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you would think that the reconstructed replied would be EXACTLY the same would you not?

throws bout upon what is actually a copy and paste jobbie and what is a true recon of the original docs.

 

somethings amiss here...one of them might be 3rd hand info..

 

no default notice is fatal to any claim if the defence is worded correctly

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sll,s reconstituted  copy has a different address in section parties place of bussiness and sections are not set out  in the same order anyway even i cann see theres is not a copy of the original but made up

 

Sll,s reconstituted  copy has a different address in section parties place of bussiness and sections are not set out  in the same order anyway even i cann see theres is not a copy of the original but made up in fact it is nearly tottaly different to the original one

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you will need to be clear upon what dates these returns were received and upon which response for documentation returns they are in relation too.

those exact details will be most probably be needed for the witness statement stage .IF IF IF this claim gets that far. I can see this being discontinued by them.

 

for the minute a brief but not a give away statement as to what is wrong, will be included in his defence

but that's not due till/by 4pm june 14th

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no respose to cpr request yet 

could a defence be on the lines of 

1 discrepancy  in the re constituted agreement compared to the original one 

2  there is no evidence of how the total amount claimed is made up sll  2 line  statement of account only starts after they were assigned the debt and nearly £300 more than the original loan  

3  no copy of the  notice  of assignment  from MIA  only there typed letter saying  so 

4 ( not mentioned in the poc i asked for a copy in the pap response pack)    but no default notice from mia only an email from 5 years ago  from sll saying they have  posted one from themselves 3 months after assignment   no  memory of this being recieved 

the dicrepancy with the  agreement are  different trading adress , rate of interest is different , no apr figure shown  ammount of interest per day is different  different phone number for mia 

 

thks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

too specific.

 

will be something like

 

the claimant replied to a previous request made under a reply to a Pre Action Protocol Letter Of Claim and a CCA request with some documentation. Their reply contained incomplete reconstructions, with many documents upon my list totally missing. The claimants solicitor has failed to reply to date to a CPR 31:14 made date xxxxx again requesting the missing /incomplete items required under statute.

 

amongst the other points in that linked thread above you need to include

 

not due yet anyway.

i'm sure andyorch will pop in nearer the defence filing date. [14th june]

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

still needed to litigate

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

soz for all the questions ive read different things 

 when mia sold and transfered to sll - notice of assignment of accounts 

all client loans where money in advance is entitled to prove as a creditor is this statenent correct  

(An assignee can issue the DN if the OC didn't default the debt before sale and as mia  went into admin the loan was sold live before default.)

thks

Link to post
Share on other sites

someone still has to produce it to litigate

part of sec 87/8 of the cca.

read a few default notice wins in the successes forum.

 

andy will clarify all this and the correct wording adaptions to any std defence from here you find

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi put wrong date at top of thread still have 7 more days to file a defence a reply from morty law regards cpr request

They say this will probably  be allocated to small claims track so part 31 ofcivil procedure rules will not apply  they say they have already sent me  documentry evidence when replying to my request for documents  via pap pack i sent back 

They also say they are happy to settle via out of court payment arrangements  or via small claims mediation service and pleas ring us to disscuss this

As mentioned earlier in post wat they sent me no alot thks

Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you mean you put the wrong date..so whats the date top right on the claimform then.???

 

as for their waffle about CPR doesn't apply..

it does and its not allocated to track until the court says so .

probable is not good enough and they know it

how many more times are they going to pull that stunt for not complying with CPR

 

seems like they are already offering a settlement.. so they know they've not got a chance in court and were hoping you'd wet yourself and cough up when you got their claimform or ignore and as 85% people do, they'd get a default undefended rubberstamped judgement whereby no human checks anything.

 

who's replied to the CPR ..a solicitor?? who??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so next Friday by 4pm

 

moriarty never turn up

so as long as you do

you'll win hands down.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to SSL/moriarty Claimform - old money in advance PDL

 

 hi  this is the  4th  go 


i have put the proper values in the poc  and date  haven't got a clue what i typed in first post lol 


Particulars of Claim


1.the defendant owes the claimant £657.10 under a regulated loan agreement with money in advance ltd dated  25/07/ 2013 which was assigned to claimant on 12/05/2014 and notice of which was given to the defendant on  12/05/2014  (debt)
2.despite formal demand for payment of the debt the defendant has failed to pay.and the claimant claims £657.10
and further claims interest there on pursuant to section 69  of the county court act  1984 limited to one year to the date hereof at  the rate of 8.00% per annum amounting to £52.56
i presume   we dont  need to mention the irregularities in  the recon agreement  compared to the original   no proper copy of nos  and  no proper statement of account  to show how this debt has grown  no default notice  never been served  by original creditor  a notice of arrears.


DEFENCE 


the defendant contends that the poc  are vague and generic in nature 
the claimant replied to a request made under a reply to a pre action protocol  letter of claim made on 19/11/2018
the reply contained  incomplete reconstitutions with irregularities in the  reconstituted agreement It is therefore considered that this is not a true copy of the executed agreement  and with documents missing from the list in my request
a cpr 31.14 request was made to the claimants solicitor  dated  2/06/2019  in the reply dated 12/06/2019  they have not adhered to my request  and they  state clearly  cpr  rule 31. does not apply 
the claimant has shown no evidence how the amount claimed has been reached 
the claimant has shown no evidence of a legal right  to claim this debt
therefore the claimant is  put to strict proof to 
 a) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for;
 b show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 I think Some changes to make  but do you leave fine details for witness staement  stage inclueding details of the  documents i never got in pap request thks

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure where you got that from 

but its been truncated and is not in its full form from where you got it from here

it is important you keep the wording as was the original simply changing relevant details to your situation where necessary 

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know time is getting  you cudnt point me in the direction  of a best thread to compare with it would be most appreciated or is it keep reading thks

Edited by safc
Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres one similar....plenty in the Legal Success Forum.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/407429-mmfmoriarty-claimform-old-mr-lender-pdlclaim-dismissed/

 

Andy

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...