Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1743 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi group,

this involves a (APP) fraud,

 

i deal with a company in India, they sent me good in Feb 2019 no problem.

 

The problem arose when in April I received an invoice , but with fake bank details.

I believed i was communicating with the supplier.

 

I queried the payment details with the supplier, these had changed from the original payment details they had sent in the past, I had paid them 4/5 times over a 6 year period. I  even sent over a copy of the international payment document filled out that i would be sending to check they were ok with how it was filled out, i was communicating with the con person who had intercepted the original payment details.

 

  I then went to Yorkshire bank 18th April with an already filled out international payment document, obviously I was unaware that the beneficiary was a fake . Now i normally use my same branch but this time i used a different branch . Payment details were to a bank in Spain my good were from India first flag not spotted.

 

The bank clerk checked over the document amending Swift code of the beneficiary of which i initialled.

Payment was slow I even went into another branch about 26th April and payment had still not been sent ,this was strange, so I believe Yorkshire bank had a few doubts.

 

On the 16th April i realised i had been conned,

i immediately went to Yorkshire bank and made a statement of the con and gave all details.

 

Since then i have noticed that i had written the wrong account number in my details one digit was incorrect, this major point I believe may of saved me, Yorkshire bank still sent the money over 13K.

I have highlighted their mistake and was told we knew it was my bank details anyway.

 

My question is if my bank account details were incorrect surely the payment should not of gone thru and I should have been informed and asked to either change the digit and signature the change. Y

 

orkshire bank after one day fraud investigation send me an e mail refusing to reimburse my monies,

to be honest it looked like a template letter,

 

I have now lodged a complaint to be told i am in a queue system.

 

I have today sent a GDPR request.

I am aware of new laws being passed on payments by the steering group,

Yorkshire bank on their web site quote the following:

 

image.png.a44f22ba9d328c18f040b642095757d7.png

 

My next options today will to do a letter before court action 7 day. Comments please thank you

 

image.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update having issued a SAR the bank say because the payment was from a limited company they wont release information, but we will question this.

They are not paying me back the money for now

They have also admitted they changed a digit on the payment form without authorisation. But hey can do this NOT

The fight goes on next FOS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...