Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, my initial view is that @unclebulgaria67 is probably right and that because it was a magistrate's warrant, it would be the energy company that would have been in control of the situation directly. Unfortunately this will be much more difficult to deal with then dealing directly with Marston but anyway if you give us your details as requested, we can at least get Outlook from that direction as well. I'm also wondering about the position of your landlord in this. As you have taken up a tenancy in a particular property then I would have thought that one of the terms of the tenancy would be that you should be entitled to quiet enjoyment. Although the landlord may say that it is not their fault and it is down to the previous tenant, at the end of the day you have a contract with the landlord who has certain responsibilities. I think we may consider involving the landlord in this as well. You say that there have been letters addressed to the previous tenant. What have you done with those?
    • Yes please. We have certain direct access to Marston and we may be able to get someone to look at this at a senior level. Please email us as requested with your own contact details and name of previous tenant.   We can't guarantee any particular result but we can promise you that it will be looked at.
    • they say in letter dated 20/01/20 that the agreement was terminated on 30 July 2017 and cannot be terminated twice, so your VT request is invalid. startline issued termination or Default notices on the following dates: letter: 30/03/2017 termination notice  liable for payment: arreaers to date : £365.38 the balance of: £10,586.50 total: £10,951.88 7 days notice else ROG+sums outstanding. ....................... Letter: 11/12/2017 Default Notice nature of breach: instalments of £211.73 due 30th each month. action to remedy: payment of arrears £449.23 by 30-12-17 other info: payments to date: £5226.91 outstanding: £9351.89 less rebate: £2251.41 Amount Due: £7100.48 if you act before 30-12-17 and have paid £7056.90 you can VT. ............ Letter: 27-07-2018 Default Notice refs a dn dated:31/05/2016 - there is no such DN in an SAR return. nature of breach: instalments of £211.73 on 30th each month. action to remedy: payment of arrears £226.73 by 15-08-2018 other info: on or after date 27-07-2018 we shall terminate,withdraw possesion and recoversums due upon termination. total paid: £6250.91 outstanding: £7647.28 less rebate: £1590.47 Amount Due: £6065.81 if you act before 15-08-18 and have paid £7056.90 you can VT. ........................  letter: 01-10-2018 termination notice  liable for payment: arreaers to date : £325.06 the balance of: £6079.75 total: £6404.81 7 days notice else ROG+sums outstanding. ……………………...     NEW ORDER STATEMENTS.pdf Doc1.pdf
    • thank you.   have you had issues paying credit before you took any of these out?   i'e were you keeping a good handle upon your credit file and it wasn't shot with any defaults or payment markers during the period when you applied and were successful in getting any of this additional credit?   my thoughts are ...should the above not be the case and your credit worthiness was good... so couldn't p'haps introduce some irresponsible lending complaints in association to them … it might be an idea to give all your creditors the heads up that times are hard and you wish them to help you, as they are duty bound to do, by freezing interest and any penalty fees to allow you to ride out this present financial hardship till things improve ...   how does that sound...   dx  
  • Our picks

whatshouldido192

Counterfeit 16+ Oyster 71 times - TfL refuses OOC settlement

Recommended Posts

Do we think he got sent down?

 

H


40 years at the pointy end of the motor trade. :eek:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what for 71 no chance ever 


..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, where is he then?

 

H


40 years at the pointy end of the motor trade. :eek:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys, I'm here. I've done my court hearing, pay a fine and still wait for the letter from the court, I'm getting a conviction but should be spent in 1 year. They didn't really specify on the day so I'm not too sure

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.ukcisa.org.uk/Information--Advice/Visas-and-Immigration/Protecting-your-Tier-4-status

 

see the section on criminal convictions.

Do NOT assume your conviction will be ‘spent’ for immigration purposes if you have to extend your visa / seek ILR. You MUST declare it.

 

Not declaring it and it being found would lead to an absolute refusal and bar you from applying again (for ?10 years?).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, I'm waiting for the letter from the court then I will declare it to the Home office right away

and yes, I understand that i still have to declare under the UK visa application even though it's spent

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, so I'm back. Just an update for everyone, so I was at the court and pay my fine (a heaping £800). I didn't have the chance to talk with my prosecutor on the day, I managed to apologise myself on the day so I think that was alright, paid my fine on the day and got a letter confirming that I have paid the fine as well.

 

However, weird thing, I didn't hear the court saying anything about enter in my record at the end of the hearing. And also today I was doing my DBS check and no record showing that I have anything up there, so my record was clear. Do you know if this is a delay or something because it has been 2 months since my court hearing. I also received no letter from the court ever since.

 

Also before the court hearing 1 day, I talked to another solicitor and apparently the charges against me was never supposed to be in my record ( like speeding ticket from what I remembered correctly but seems a little bit bongus tbh)

 

So anyone had any similar experience like this? Should I tick on the box [NO] for criminal record if they asked me in the future as my DBS check shown that my record is clear?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can’t do an enhanced DBS check on yourself.

 

If you don’t declare it and the Home Office find it and conclude you have been dishonest in your declaration : almost certain refusal, and potentially an exclusion period, too.

 

That'd be way worse than declaring it.

If you declare it & get accepted, it can’t later “come back to bite you”. 

Edited by BazzaS
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@dx100uk Thank you for the suggestion, so the lady at the court told me that since it's a minor conviction, it won't show under the basic DBS check and usually shown under the enhanced one. She has confirmed it is on my record and I will need to tick if I was asked

 

@BazzaS Thank you, I was confirmed from the lady at court as well. But I just want to reconfirm, I will need to declare it for any visa purposes; but if it's for jobs that doesn't require to (say 1 year from my court date), I won't need to declare it if I'm correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“Jobs you don’t need to declare it” : so not exempt from Rehab of Offenders legislation

- once it is “spent” you don’t need to declare it.

 

Visa applications (UK and USA) better to always declare.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...