Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1st letter image.pdf1st letter 2nd page.pdf
    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
    • Please post up their letter so we understand what they've asked. You need to cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • Hello,  I received the standard letter.  I don't understand No. 3: If this is in relation to a ticket irregularity, then if you were unable to produce a pass because you did not have it with you or if your pass was withdrawn because you were unable to produce a valid photocard to accompany it, please enclose a photocopy of the pass/photocard with your reply. Question: do i enclose my photocard? my partner's freedom pass was confiscated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Npower claim form *** Settled Tomlin Order ***


Jayne777
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1721 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

i was hoping someone might be able to give me some advice please.

 

It’s a bit complicated, but I’ve ended up with a claim form and I’m terrified. 

 

I moved house two years ago.

At my old address I was with npower.

I lived there for 3 years.

 

We had some financial issues and we were in arrears with npower, but we also were making some payments to them, as agreed with them.

When we moved, I had health issues (problematic pregnancy)  and was in hospital a bit and I didn’t straight away try to resolve the npower issues.

I heard no more from them

 

just over a year ago when I got a letter from William chapman solicitors, it was demanding over £4000 from us for npower.

They said they’d sent me an incoming and outgoing letter which I hadn’t received, so they emailed me a copy,

I sent it back to them and heard no more from them and didn’t chase them.

 

I then received a letter before action a few weeks ago and I now have a claim form from them, dated 14th May.

I don’t dispute that I owe npower some money, but I have no idea how the bill can possibly be as high as they’re saying.

 

Even if I hadn’t paid at all for three years that would still be a high bill, but we did pay, even though I know there were arrears. I don’t know how to proceed at all.

I can’t afford to pay them over £5000 which they now have the bill at, and I also can’t afford to get a ccj.

I’d like to come up with a payment plan but they didn’t respond last time I sent them one.

I’d really appreciate any advice please!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Name of the Claimant ? NPower

 

Date of issue – 14 May 2019

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 

1.The claim is for £4000 relating to unpaid charges for energy supplied by the claimant to the defendant, and set out in an invoice date 26 June  2017 full particulars of which have been delivered to the defendant.

 

2.And the claimant claims any further arrears that may have accrued and become payable since the commencement of these proceedings.

 

3.And the claimant claims interest on the sum due pursuant to section 69 of the county courts act 1984 from the due date to the date of issue at 8.00% per annum being £630 and further interest on a daily basis until the date of judgement or sooner payment at a daily rate of £0.91p.

 

The claimant claims

(1) the sum of £4000,

(2) interest of £630.00,

(3) continuing daily interest at £0.91p.

 

What is the total value of the claim? £5100

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC ( Pre Action Protocol) ? I received a letter before action

 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?

yes, but they were aware of this and have had my address from the day I moved

 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?Yes


Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? energy 

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After

 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Probably phone 

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/ Equifax /Etc...) ? Only on one of them

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. - Npower

 

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

No

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  Not that I’m aware of

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? no

 

Why did you cease payments?

We got into financial trouble, for behind, made an agreement to pay, which we did, then they increased the payments a lot and I couldn’t afford the new payments, and then we moved and our supplier changed

 

What was the date of your last payment? I don’t know

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan

sort of yes, as part of our monthly payments, but they broke down shortly before we moved. I can’t honestly remember a great deal about it all as it’s a few years ago and I was regularly in and out of hospital at the time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? William chapman

 

who is the name of the claimant not their solicitors please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

shame you ignored the letter of claim.

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked.
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.
.
 get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/
ask for all the bills for the complete period claimed for in the POC above.

have you this invoice still they speak of from 2017?

if not ask for that too.


type your name ONLY

no need to sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chances are there are discrepancies in the bills that make the amount on the claim inaccurate and possibly overstated.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

E = Estimates

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well £4k is a lot of electric for one year so I would assume you had arrears for many years?

they mention an invoice they sent you in 2017.

have you got that?

I bet some of the bills were estimates too unless you were giving them regular readings or you had regular meter readers call and do it themselves?

 

but anyway, via the CPR 31:14 they will have to produce them all

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the thing, we lived there for 3 years almost to the day, we weren’t with npower at the house before or after. And over that 3 years we did struggle to pay the bill for some of that time, and we did get some arrears, but it wasn’t anywhere near all of the time we live there

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you that invoice still?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve looked through all of my paperwork and can’t find it anywhere so I don’t think so, I will have another look tonight 

 

And I remember most of the bills were estimates, they had a lot of trouble getting to one of the meters as it had been fitted really high. They did occasionally bring ladders and read it properly though

Link to post
Share on other sites

Room to argue with Estimates, did you have a proper opening and final meter reading as you say a meter was in a bad position?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

get that CPR off

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then get those photos too

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The solicitors haven’t responded to my cpr request yet. 

 

I’ve been reading and reading and I have no clue what to base my defence on, can anyone give me any pointers at all please? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

defence is not due till/by 14th june 4pm

 

will be our standard holding / no paperwork one in most claimform threads here already

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you! I’ve seen that one and can adjust..

 

but what do I do if they do send the paperwork? 

 

Am i ok to put it up here and would you check it for me please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont submit a defence without getting it checked here

 

ofcourse...

 

have you not read upload 

and seen others doing it

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hiya

 

i thought I was sorted with my defence, I was just going to post it up here, but I thought it was ok, then when I've come to post it here and hope that you'd check it I realised I'd messed up, as its from the solicitors of npower and the debt hasn't been sold. I've had another go but I'm not sure I'm right with this, would you have a look at it for me please?

 

Also, if its due on the 14th, I was going to submit it today or tomorrow, is that right? I've been waiting too to see if I do get the documents I've requested but I haven't received them. I thought they would in all honesty get them out. I've been back through all of my paperwork again and I have not got the invoice they refer to. I've carefully filed everything I have received from them, which is actually very little, but I definitely don't have that so I can only assume I never received it at all.

 

Here is my second attempt at a defence..

 

Defence

1.       The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR 31.14 in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

2.       Paragraph 1 and 2 are noted however as I do not recall the precise details of the alleged agreement, nor did I receive the invoice referred to and am unaware of a default being issued I have sought verification from the claimant.

3.       I have requested from the claimant information pertaining to this claim by way of a 31.14 request. The claimant has failed to date to respond the CPR.

4.       It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

a)       Show how the defendant entered into an agreement; and

b)      Show and evidence the breach and service of the Default Notice

c)       Show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for

5.       As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

6.       By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please do not submit the above defence.....it is not correct for this type of claim.

 

I will draft you one more appropriate tomorrow.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its actually Saturday 15th but MCOL closes down Friday 4.00pm...so we have until then. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of Claim (for reference only do not submit with defence)

 

1.The claim is for £4000 relating to unpaid charges for energy supplied by the claimant to the defendant, and set out in an invoice date 26 June  2017 full particulars of which have been delivered to the defendant.

 

2.And the claimant claims any further arrears that may have accrued and become payable since the commencement of these proceedings.

 

3.And the claimant claims interest on the sum due pursuant to section 69 of the county courts act 1984 from the due date to the date of issue at 8.00% per annum being £630 and further interest on a daily basis until the date of judgement or sooner payment at a daily rate of £0.91p.

 

The claimant claims

(1) the sum of £4000,

(2) interest of £630.00,

(3) continuing daily interest at £0.91p.

 

##########Defence ###########

 

1. The defendant contends that the particulars of claim fails to plead in accordance with CPR 16.4 The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. The defendant did reside at a rented property from....to (insert dates ) for a period of three years in connection to the alleged amount claimed.I have never had any contractual relationship with Npower before or after the dates stated.

 

3. The letting agent did record meter readings at the start and end of my tenancy which ended over two years ago. 

 

4. During our occupancy of the above property it is admitted that we did encounter financial difficulties and did incur arrears with Npower.However we did continue to make payments as agreed by the claimant up until the end of the tenancy.

 

5.During the residency Npower  mostly relied on estimated bills and very rarely ever read or requested actual readings.

 

6.After leaving the property I had health issues (problematic pregnancy)  and was in hospital for lengthy periods and failed to resolve the Npower issues.There as been no contact since from the claimant up until over a year ago when I received a  letter from William Chapman Solicitors, demanding over £4000 They said they had sent me an incoming and outgoing letter which I hadn’t received, so they emailed me a copy, I sent it back to them asking for clarification and heard no more and so didn’t chase them.

 

7.I  received a letter before action  dated xxxxxx which only allowed 14 days  and have now received a claim form  dated 14th May. It is my understanding that pursuant to Pre Action Protocol (PAPDC) the claimant has failed to allow the required period of time to resolve this matter without need of a court claim It is therefore respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

 

8.It is accepted that a balance is due but not of the amount claimed .It is not possible to owe that amount over a 3 year occupancy whilst continually making normal payments and payments to arrears.

 

9.Therefore the claimant is put to strict proof to evidence and quantify the amount claimed by way of meter readings and providing a full statement of payments made and charges during the three year tenancy from dates  xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx.

 

10.For the reasons set out above the defendant denies she is indebted to the amount claimed  and the claimant is denied the amount requested and any interest as applicable.

 

 

 

 

One defence.....check it over for accuracy and edit if necessary.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...