Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Backdoor 2016 Ridgewood Estates Ltd/MW Solicitors - Rent Arrears - N5 Claim for Possession + Money Judgement - now HCEO warrant


Staara77
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 568 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Did you put in the n245?

 

DX

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I have put in an n245.

 

I'm also waiting to hear from Brighton County Court regarding the CCJ and POC.

When I phoned Northants, they told me to contact Brighton County Court.

 

But meanwhile I have all the details regarding yesterday. 

So I've been given a letter (as I wasn't home) by Wilson&Roe high court enforcement

 

It says: Formal Notice: Intention to take Control of Goods and the total sum has not gone up to £10,633.89.

 

It also says if the sum remains unpaid and further enforcement action continues, it will rise to £11,582.23.

Now there is a daily interest rate accruing at £1.43.

 

They've given the number of the enforcement agent and his name.

 

My partner phoned the man up and told him that as the owner of the flat, he refused entry to the enforcement officer.

The officer then told my partner that he required an inventory of all the goods he owned and receipts etc.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please stop randomly phoning people!!

the bailiff fees/involvement will be rolled back onCe your n245 gets processed. thats all he should have saib.

 

can you please go ring northants bulk again as i asked

a diff operator might see the details we need.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But it wasn't me that rang the person, it was my partner.

 

I am concerned over what to do when the guy comes and knocks on the door again.

 

He wants to take control of goods, so what do I do when he comes and knocks on the door again?

 

I do not know what I can or cannot do when he knocks on the door, and I find the letter very threatening.

 

I've attached the letter that was given.

 

Intention to Take Control Of Goods.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no right of forced entry for CCJ's. Simply ignore the bailiff.

 

Did you do as asked in my last post?

Or have you now wasted another 3 days before you get the POC that we've been waiting for for over 10 days now?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who from , by what method,  and when did you do this?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I took time to reply.

I wanted to wait until I got some information before coming on here.

 

I sent via e-mail following all the guidelines Brighton County Sent me regarding  asking for a CCJ and POC, which I followed exactly. 

 

So I asked Brighton County Court for POC and CJJ, today they send my a claim form for possession of property.

 

I have attached a copy of the letter.

 

One thing is for certain, I was never aware of a court claim, I received no letter or e-mail etc (whatever they send).

It could've been they sent it to an address I was no longer living at, hence why I wasn't aware.

 

claim for possession + money Judgement 2016.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Homelet/Barbon Ins Grp - now repo order - demanding £6k for Landlord Ins Bill??

How can your home be repossessed for a debt concerning an old property not this one?

 

 

you said this was old insurance related to do with an old landlord.. That is nothing to do with this property??

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is regarding an old landlord where I used to live, and had to move out back in 2016 or 2015 (I can't remember the exact dates I used to live there).

 

Yes it's regarding rent arrears and I explained to the agency why I had to move out, yet they didn't say anything, not a word. 

 

Then, according to the documents I got from Brighton County Court (that I posted on here), I was supposed to attend court, yet did not receive any letter regarding this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to deal with the repo order too

Is this rent arrears to do with a diff rented property from where you now rent? But is from the same rental company you now rent from?

 

Are you up to date with your present rent?

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Backdoor CCJ Homelet/Barbon Ins Grp - old rent arrears - now warrant

i cant read dates...:pound:

 

so we still need the POC please

 

dx

 

 

.

  • Sad 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked Brighton County Court for a POC and a CCJ, I followed all of the steps they set out for me to complete, and they sent me the recent document I attached.

 

Out of curiosity, after having followed the instructions and having asked for a POC, and not getting it, is there something I'm missing out on?

 

I don't mind asking Brighton County Court again, only I don't want to waste another £11 if they don't send me the documents I ask for.

 

So the property I've gotten the Northants and Wilson&Row letters for I shall call A.

 

I moved out of property A sometime in 2016, and have lived at different addresses since then. I've not gone back to property A since I had to move out. 

 

Where I live now belongs to my partner, it is his place, and has nothing to do with any agency. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Backdoor 2016 Ridgewood Estates Ltd/MW Solicitors - Rent Arrears - N5 Claim for Possession + Money Judgement - now HCEO warrant

ok sorry i was somewhat confused by all this.. not firing on all cylinders at present.

 

they've only tried this on as its fast approaching 6yrs?

 

not actually sure if there is actually anything you need to do?

there is certainly nothing the HCEO can do.

its a rent arrears money judgement not for your present address.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well at least you have now caught up. I hope you get better soon. 

 

Other enforcement methods may be tried, but the length of time suggests the judgement creditor may be reluctant to spend any significant amount on this. 

Edited by mantis shrimp
Link to post
Share on other sites

So they have traced you to your current address to seek payment or seize goods to cover the value of the debt including enforcement costs. 

 

Although they have no rights to force entry they can look to seize goods you own outside of your current address e.g. your car, if you own one.

 

If the HCEO cannot get anywhere with you on this, it will be referred back to the claimant and they could look at other ways to enforce the debt.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Okay folks sorry for taking so long to reply but I've been waiting to hear back from Brighton County Court...and they've been taking their time.

 

So the latest update is Brighton County Court has asked me to fill out an N244 (after I sent off the N245 to them), they sent me an e-mail last Thursday, asking to fill out an N244.

 

I've filled out the N244 and sent it off to them...I am still waiting to hear from Brighton County Court regarding this.

 

This is just an update.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...