Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the OP follows king’s advice and then the neighbour’s roof leaks, who do you think the neighbour will blame? a) the dodgy “roofers” (who will be long gone), b) the OP for “damaging a perfectly good repair” (even if they don’t damage it, and it wasn’t a good repair!), or c) someone else   King may be technically correct, but the OP following their advice isn’t likely to end well if the neighbour is already ‘difficult’. 
    • I sent a SAR. which also provided a copy of proof of ID, last month to Northumbrian Water, and received no reply whatsoever.   After the 30 day deadline passed i sent off a complaint form to the ICO and sent a letter of claim to NW for breach of statutory duty. (As up until today they had failed to respond in any way to the request that was made)   Today i received a reply saying the my ID wasn't in the standard format and they could not accept it,   (The exact same copy of ID has not been an issue before and the exact same image was accepted perfectly fine by a previous energy company i SAR'd), and that they required i give them 2 forms of I.D, 1 from list A and from List B Along with questioning the alternative address like i mentioned above.   I wanted the request to be sent to the alternate address, as i work full time and i'm not always at my home address, i'd most likely not be in at a time when it can be delivered and can't get to the delivery office easily enough before it would be returned back undelivered. (Which i wanted to avoid happening again as this happened to the last SAR i made.) The address is my partner's address, where i regularly go and who also works from home and wouldn't have issues receiving/collecting mail.
    • yes they are entitled to query...GDPR applies   full story please don't play secret squirrel        
    • Hi,   I received a reply from a SAR I sent today (This was only after I sent a Letter of Claim as the company failed to reply or acknowledge the SAR in any way, though that deserves its own thread)    In the SAR I asked for my request to be sent to an alternate address, In the response they asked for clarification as to why I requested this.    Provided that the company has been given enough proof and information to verify my identity would I need to provide this reason for them to process my request? 
    • Following a six month battle with a supplier concerning the purchase of a faulty item which resulted in the submission of a case to money claims on-line & mediation, an agreed settlement was reached & part of the settlement involved me having to arrange, return & pay the necessary charges to return the faulty item to the supplier/manufacturer. On receipt of the item they would within seven days refund the agreed settlement figure together with the costs of the postal/courier fees.     A contract was taken out with Parcel Force on line, 24 hour express delivery according to the information that is given when entering into this contract, the customer will receive up to date tracking of their parcel together with a message alert when the parcel reaches its destination.   Parcel was picked up as promised   when checking the tracking some 24 hours later the parcel had still not been delivered nor had the tracking.   A number of telephone calls were made to Parcel Force where I was told that my Parcel was at the National Hub but had been delayed due to a malfunction & could I check back later that evening.     Following morning I checked the tracking & it still read the same.   Following several telephone calls I have been informed that they are unable to confirm whether the parcel has been lost,   the exact location of the parcel & whether it will be delivered.     I submitted a claim on line to Parcel Force on the morning of 19th June & to my astonishment when checking the status of the claim a number of hours later have discovered that they have closed my claim.     Status says rejected - claim passed to online team.     Due to the situation of this parcel having to reach its destination as soon as possible I want to pursue this matter via a money claim online process.   I would also like to add that I did not take out an insurance with Parcel Force as I naturally & genuinely assumed that they would fulfil their contract & deliver the parcel as promised.     I feel that I am being given the runaround every time I speak to them   am very keen to commence action against them as soon as possible.     Any advice would be gratefully received & sorry for the long winded post.  
  • Our picks

    • My personal experiences of Future Comms 
       
      Don't touch them owe me £500 since January 2019 make excuse after excuse. Seem they always have software problems sending money out. Keep saying they will call back or email nothing been chasing it now for 6 mths the phone staff always have the same banter we will chase it up and get back to you then nothing!
      • 0 replies
    • Future Comms is a Big Con. How to get out of it. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/417058-future-comms-is-a-big-con-how-to-get-out-of-it/
        • Like
      • 4 replies
    • Future Comms issues. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416504-future-comms-issues/
      • 5 replies
    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
Dave962

VCS/BW PCN - Letter Before Claim

Recommended Posts

Thanks Ericsbrother for your replies.

 

Just to keep you updated I've now had a txt message to remind me if I'd like to pay BW off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

haha they are funny

 

 

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone

 

Just by way of an update, the latest love letter off BW, costs have now risen again...

 

Principle Dept, and initial legal costs £154.00

Est. Interest £5.06

Est Court Fees £25.00

Est Solicitor Costs £50.00

Est Total £234.06

 

I've got till 27t July to avoid proceedings being commenced.

 

The tossers have also tried calling me again.

 

Any advice you can offer will as always be appreciated.

 

Thanks

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so they want you to pay their estimated costs before they actually incur them.

 

 

As you know, BW can say what they want but they are only paid to send out letters so if someone doesnt pay them more money they will just shut up.

 

If you want to respond a repeat of the

 

 

"A lack of contractual obligation makes your demands spurious, please refer back to your client and desist this harassment" will do.

 

 

They know the truth but want some free money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and it doesn't say will anything.

read the letter properly!

 

 

proceeding don't mean legal proceedings..

just more scary letters.....


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks as always for your replies.

 

I will now send out a brief letter to BW, with the quote mentioned above.

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

good, dont add anything else or they will think that you are awaverer and try and ramp up the pressure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

VCS have just sent out a Letter Before Claim to me, 3 years after their last correspondence!

 

June 16 was the last time I was on this message board and I received some great advice, and I thought that was going to be the end of it. I am unable to respond to my original thread now as it is so dated, so will anyone else still be able to view it?

 

If somebody could please offer some advice on how to respond it would be much appreciated, and if you require further details of course I will provide them.

 

Many thanks

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By clicking on your user name it uncovers your posts in 2016. I am sure that ericsbrother will read them and re-familiarise himself with the thread and give you advice.


My time as a Police Officer and subsequently time working within the Motor Trade gives me certain insights into the problems that consumers may encounter.

I have no legal qualifications.

If you have found my post helpful, please enhance my reputation by clicking on the star. Thank you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Gick that’s a great start 🤞 Ericsbrother gets back or DX seemed to be helpful also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

simply send one of ericbrothers snotty/insulting letters back to them.

 


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go as per DX use what EB suggests as a guide, along the lines of you had no legitimate claim 3 years ago, i haven't and you, I and BW legal know this, and I haven't forgotten, sure EB will call in and suggest something suitable

 

If they do decide to be silly, the fact that you and they did that there was no basis for a claim 3 years ago, and you have just now reiterated this to them will not help them at all they could get a tolchocking by a Judge at a hearing.

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks gents looking forward to seeing one of Ericsbrothers snotty replies and sending it on to them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not being funny dave

you've been here since 2016

 

more than enough time to realise cag is also a self help forum and we have a very good custom google search box on the left after clicking our top left logo in the top red banner for you to research your issue.

 

you need to understand WHY such a letter is sent, not get it on a plate without the background as to why its worded in such a manner.

this will further your case cause oneday you could be in a courtroom with a judge being cross examined by the claimants solicitor, flipping ones lips and making silly noises wont cut it.

 

dx

 

 

  • Haha 1

PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about tis-

Dear sirs, I am surprised that Simple Simon is wasting his money hiring the parking world's second worst solicitors to chase up a claim that both you and he knows is spurious.. Should you between you decide to take civil action I shall ask for a full costs recovery order as the claim is vex. I am also minded to sue VCS under Vidal Hall and others v Google  and VCS v Phillip Liverpool CC Dec 2016 as they have no justification for obtaining and processing my personal data.

 

That should hopefully have the desired effect, VCS havent used either Gladdys or BWL for a while preferring to lose defended claims off their own bat recently.

 

Now you need to prepare for court just in case they do carry on so start gathering evidence now

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ericsbrother, looks good to me. I’ll send such a letter back to them and they can take it from there.

 

Thanks DX for replying again also. I’ll look into the background of these things further like you say. However not sure where that last part of your message come from, it was you that made the original silly remark wasn’t it? Or have I missed something there??

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there is a serious point you need to understand though,

we can advise but we cant stand next to you if they do want to try their luck and sue so you need to know what it is all about rather than relying on what others tell you.

 

this means reading up a lot about private parking and the law surrounding the issues people face and also learning about how the companies behave.

 

they have sent you a threatogram because they think after this time you have binned all of your paperwork.

 

Now the good news is that it would be a very rare occasion that they would actually show their faces in court just to receive an earwigging from a judge about abuses of procedure when they are just slapping in claims as a method of coercing you into paying when they know that there is no real cause for action, like in your case>

 

however, as the law stands they can do this as often as they want as long as they dont keep suing the same person and invite a charge of vexatious litigation.

 

you will find examples where people like Alex Shipp have tried their damndest to bait the parking co's to take them to court but all that happens is they then start to do a bit of quality control and whitelist certain people's car reg or address.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ericsbrother.

 

I’m just amazed that 3 years down the road these people are still at it.

 

Is this a new tactic or an old chestnut? 

Thankfully Ive still got a record of all my previous correspondence with them.

 

It seems a lot to take in looking at historical cases and not all of it is easy to find.

Obviously I have my old records to back me up should it go any further, but if it did end up in court would I require the services of a solicitor or do I fight off my own back.

Apologies for my ignorance.

 

in the meantime I’ll fire off that letter back to VCS and if I do hear any more I’ll let you know.

 

Thanks again for your help though I really appreciate it and it’s amazing you and DX etc offer your support.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no its not a new tactic

its designed that way from the get go.

mostly hoping people have moved etc etc

then they go for a backdoor CCJ that you'll know nowt about till it blocks something requiring a clean credit record or the court send bailiffs around.

 

which is why it SO important to know the score


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX.

 

Letter sent now. Ive also had a look at the cases EB mentioned earlier, which is all very interesting reading like you said. It’s reassuring to know cases have been won against them, and its amazing what lengths they seem to go to, to try and reel you in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you wont need a solicitor, you would struggle to find one that knows about parking law as a specific topic so you are better off learning for yourself.

 

Now my thoughts are on whether they want to pay BWL to lose for them or cut their losses.

 

Look up champerty and maintenance as we believe that the practices of Gladstones and BWL in offering a type of no win no fee arrangement may well risk crossing that line if for example this letter was sent out without the express instruction of VCS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...