Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • doesn't matter you've admitted about the DN and anyway where have you done that and to whom?   by assignment arrows are the creditor regardless to your acking of that fact or not.      
    • Just ignore the letter.   Block/bounce their emails or let them come through so you know what they're up to, and keep us posted.............   😎
    • Thanks DX,   I've already admitted that a default notice was served in 2010 by MBNA, so it seems I might be left hoping that they're unable to produce the original CCA.   I've never acknowledged Arrrow as the creditor and continue to pay MBNA.  Is that in my favour?   Cheers,   Richard.
    • For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture]       please answer the following questions.       1 Date of the infringement  10/07/2019       2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]  12/07/19      3 Date received  13/07/19      4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?/    Yes      5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?  yes      6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal]  yes  Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up  yes      7 Who is the parking company?  Civil enforcement      8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]    10B QUEENS ROAD, CONSETT, DH8 0BH       For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Yes    …………………..     This is what I sent to CE appeal in my own words   Reason For Appeal: Firstly I had an appointment at that time with the dentist. My last visit 2 years ago the car park was free and was not aware of the new parking system.   The sign at the front is very obscure especially turning right into the car park. Where I did park, the sign opposite was turned 90 degrees making it hard to see.   The door at the surgery was wedged open when I entered not realizing there was a sign relating to the new system . I cannot remember if there was any signs inside the surgery but once in I always pick up a magazine to read until the dentist is ready to see me.      My statement and evidence to POPLA. in response to CE evidence highlighting main arguments.   Par 18 . The image submitted from the Appellant of a sign slightly turned is still readable and is not obscured...….. Me Not from where I was parked. A photo from the bay shows a pole with the sign facing away.  Par 18 . Furthermore, it highlights that the Appellant was aware of the signage on the site and failed to comply with the terms and conditions regardless.......  Me I treat this paragraph with contempt. There is nothing to "highlight" here as I maintain I did not see any signage; Regardless ? I could have legally parked right outside the Surgery as there were spaces at the time but having "regard" for disabled and elderly, parked further away having to cross a busy road to the Surgery. Par 20....,. Furthermore, the Appellant failed to utilise the operator’s helpline phone number,,, (displayed at the bottom of signage) to report the occurrence, or to request advice on what further action could be taken.... Me How could I have done this ? I only realized there were signs there when the PCN arrived. Summary. I stand by statements and maintain that I did not see any signage entering or leaving the car park. The main sign at the entrance is too small and easily missed when you have to turn right though busy traffic and once through carefully avoid pedestrians, some walking their dogs. The main sign is blank at the back. When you leave the car park I would have noticed the private parking rules if the writing was on both sides. Roadworks signs close to the parking sign at the time did not help either. [see photo] CE evidence is flawed, illegal and contemptuous. Photos submitted are from months ago, Today I have driven into the car park and noticed the same signs turned 90 degrees including the one opposite my bay. CE have done nothing to rectify this disregarding my evidence and the maintenance of the car park. Showing number plates is a total disregard to patients privacy and I object to these photos being allowed as evidence on the grounds that they may be illegal.    POPLAS assessment and decision....unsuccessful   Assessor summary of operator case   The operator states that the appellant’s vehicle was parked on site without a permit. It has issued a parking charge notice (PCN) for £100 as a result. Assessor summary of your case   The appellant states that he parked on site to attend a dental appointment. He states that the terms of the site had changed since the last time he parked two years ago. He states that signage at the entrance to and throughout the site did not make the terms clear. The appellant has provided various photographs taken on and around the site. Assessor supporting rational for decision   The appellant accepts that he was the driver of the vehicle on the date in question. I will therefore consider his liability for the charge as the driver.   The operator has provided photographs of the appellant’s vehicle taken by its automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras. These photographs show the vehicle entering the site at 14:17 and leaving the site at 15:13. It is clear that the vehicle remained on site for a period of 56 minutes.   Both the appellant and operator have provided photographs of the signs installed on the site. The operator has also provided a site map showing where on site each sign is located.   Having reviewed all of the evidence, I am satisfied that signage at the entrance to the site clearly states: “Permit Holders Only … See car park signs for terms and conditions”.   Signs within the site itself clearly state: “DENTAL PRACTICE PERMIT HOLDERS ONLY … ALL PATIENTS AND VISITORS MUST REGISTER FOR A PERMIT AT THE PRACTICE RECEPTION ... IF YOU BREACH ANY OF THESE TERMS YOU WILL BE CHARGED £100.”   The signs make the terms of parking on the site clear, are placed in such a way that a motorist would see the signs when parking and are in line with the British Parking Association (BPA) Code of Practice.   The operator has provided evidence to show that a search for the appellant’s vehicle has been carried out against the list of vehicles for which a valid permit was held on the date in question. The appellant’s vehicle does not appear on this list.   The appellant states that he parked on site to attend a dental appointment . I accept that this may have been the case, however I do not accept that this entitled the appellant to park on site outside of the terms.   The appellant states that the terms of the site had changed since the last time he parked two years ago. The operator’s photographs of the signage on site are dated 27 March 2019.   It is clear based on these photographs that the terms had been in place for at least three months by the time the appellant parked, which I am satisfied was a reasonable period for any regular user of the site to adapt to any change to the terms.   The appellant states that signage at the entrance to and throughout the site did not make the terms clear. He has provided various photographs taken on and around the site.   As detailed above, I am satisfied based on the evidence as a whole that signage made the terms sufficiently clear. I am satisfied from the evidence that the terms of the site were made clear and that the appellant breached the terms by parking without registering for a permit.   I am therefore satisfied that the PCN was issued correctly and I must refuse this appeal.   docs1.pdf
  • Our picks

tezza1234

14 year old welcome finance CCJ now Intrum chasing

Recommended Posts

Took a loan out 9 years ago with welcome finance for £2000

 

got into difficulty paying it back so stopped payments,

 

now 9 years on and 6 addresses later ive just had a letter at my current address from my local county court summon to appear before a court sheriff and demanding me to take a million documents, of which some i just cant get, its impossible.

 

Now i have been in touch with step change debt charity regarding my debts

and at present my outgoings are £230 a month more than my incoming and this is on basic living, i cant cut back anywhere.

 

Stepchange also told me that a CCJ was issued against me from Welcome finance in january 2013 and this local county court letter summons was to see if i could pay it all back, but obviously i cant.

 

What worries me more is the list of documents the county court has asked to see,

its huge, and half of it i dont have access too, and the other half ive probably thrown away throughout the years.

 

Really nervous what to expect to happen at county court.

 

At the time i took the loan with best intentions,

It was a unsecured loan,

but when i got in to difficulty i done the cut and run,

and 9 years later i have a county court appearance to look forward too, great.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

are you in Scotland?

 

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i last made a payment 9 years ago, and no im in south east england

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry you said sheriff above..

 

ok if you not made any payment nor written any letters

 

me thinks this was statute barred whenthey went to court

 

and they served the ccj papers to the wrong address

 

not sure what you do now

 

but that's a slam dunk reason to get the ccj set aside and p'haps

kill the debt [as it should have already been killed

but the judge obv did not check any paperwork properly.]

 

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told by step change that it does not get Statued Barred unless you inform the company (welcome) of your change of addresses and they do not persue you for 6 years,

 

 

as i never informed them of my change of addresses the CCJ still stands.

 

I have been told to offer a token payment of £1 per month for the forseable as i can prove i am living on a negative balance each month.

 

Just the thought of a court appearance is terrifying, now i know its not a criminal court its a civil county court but still

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what

stepchange is wrong there

 

doesn't matter if you don't tell a creditor you've moved!!

 

if the ccj was obtained 6yrs after you last payment or written ack

 

the debt was STATUTE BARRED when it went to court....end of debt!!

 

not even a JUDGE can unbar a debt.

 

unless there is something here we do not know.

 

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i thought it was written off after 6 years also

 

but when i asked stepchange they said did you inform the creditor you were moving address,

 

i said no i just panicked and ran and forgot about it hoping it would go away,

 

and they said the CCJ is valid as i didnt inform welcome i was moving,

 

so how was they supposed to chase me for a debt if they didnt have my known address.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if the CCJ was taken out WITHIN 6yrs then YES correct.

you could not setaside through purposeful serving to wrong address

as you did not tell them

however

 

IN THIS CASE [it looks like]

 

the debt was ALREADY STATUTE BARRED...END OF!

 

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stepchange are wrong. The debt is Statute barred regardless of what address they have for you. You need to get it set aside and state in your application that the debt has been statute barred for years and was statute barred when they applied for the CCJ.


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the fact that the OC were not informed of the change of address deems the CCJ was served correctly...

 

a lot of convincing and back tracking will need to be involved here.

 

i'd pos phone the court in the morning.

 

and ask them what is best to do now

tell them you knew nothing about the ccj & that you have discovered the debt was statute barred in [6yrs fromyour last payment date]

 

see what they advise

 

dx

Edited by dx100uk
merge

PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok have just phone the local county court, what a waste of time that was.

 

I asked why a CCJ was issued as it should be Statued Barred and she said no yo'rer wrong i think, but im not legally trained so go seek legal advice,

 

The second thing which concerned me was the list of documentation the court asked me to bring,

things like 1 years worth of gas, electricity bills, well my gas and electric is on a key meter wherby i pay cash to put credit on,

so i dont get a bill monthly/quarterly ect...

 

she just said ohh just bring what you can,

 

they make this list of documentation sound like if you dont provide it your going to be sent down, but if you havnt got it dont worry.

I think im more worried and concerned than i was before.

 

As for the court letter, im just confused,

the origonal judgement/order was given at Northampton County Court on 11th January 2013 and has been passed down to local county court who did send a baliff round who told me to fill in a income/outgoings form and return to court within 7 days, which i did,

then this letter arrived which is a order to attend court for questioning.

 

it says that i the judgement debtor attend xxxx county court on xxxx at xx time before a court officer at xxx address to provide information

about the judgement debtors means and any other information needed to enforce the judgement or order.

 

I am to answer under oath any questions which the court asks or allows the judgement creditor to ask

 

the court where the questioning will take place may make a order for payment of the costs off the application of the hearing.

 

I must obey this order and attend and if i dont i could be sent to prison for contempt of court

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

right more of the story...so its not as you portrayed.....

 

it appears this has gone to court bailiffs, you didn't say that before.

i'll see if I can get help for you.

 

in the meantime

scan up what the bailiff left you please:

 

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont have anything the baliff left me,

this was 4-6 weeks ago and it was just a income/outgoings form which i returned to the county court as requested.

 

This form i have been served now is a N39 form.

It says i can take a legal rep with me, who can this be, can i get a free solicitor to go with me, will someone from CAB go with me.

 

The baliff was not there to seize goods or anything just to issue the income/outgoings form.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely this is just a straight forward set-aside on the grounds of being a irregular judgment as it's statue barred.

 

Shouldn't the OP be getting in a N244 for set aside,

 

write letter to court/judge asking for enforcement action to be stayed in the meantime.

 

And obviously unless told otherwise, attend court at the said time and explain the situation to the judge.

 

I think dwelling on that the OP moved address without informing creditors is not useful,

 

yes naughty naughty from OP, but extremely naughty for a creditor to seek a judgment on SB'rd debt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest that a phone call is made to Welcome loans to find out when the last date of payment was and if possible that they send a email confirming this.

 

Then with the information file the N244 form asking for a set aside, with a request for any enforcement action to be stopped, while the set aside application is being considered.

 

For the hearing in regard to payment, you can just inform the Judge that you have applied to set aside the judgement and paid the relevant fee, so will await the outcome for that.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone explain to me the 100% legalities regarding a statued barred debt,

how and when it becomes statued barred, im being told 4 different things.

 

Im worried to hell over this court appearance and

 

when i spke to Step Change debt charity they said keep calm, dont worry about it.

 

You can prove your outgoing are more than your incomings on basic living and you cant cut back anymore

and you have no assets of any value as such,

 

the N39 summons is just the court wanting me to prove i cant afford to pay it rather than refusing to pay it.

 

Step Change said offer £1 a month for the next year and the review.

 

It should be noted that i have £2000 worth of priority debts of which i am paying off which include rent arrears/council tax arrears

and i have 16k worth non priority unsecured debts of which 5k

 

is this welcome finance one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Statue Barred:

If a period of 6 years elapses without acknowledgement of debt,

this can either be a payment or something in writing (from you) then the debt becomes statue barred.

This means it can't legally be enforced but the debt is still deemed to exist.

 

"legally enforced" is the key bit, i.e. it is not legally possible to incur a CCJ after 6 years. i.e. you should never have got that CCJ.

 

As said above ">6 years"="End Of".

 

Stop listening to this incorrect info you are getting from this charity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

does it not matter that i did not tell the creditor of my change off address and done a runner,

what step change is saying is the CCJ is legal as how are they supposed to chase me for a debt if they dont have my current address.

 

assuming you are right and this CCJ was wrongly issued after 6 years,

now a N39 summons has been issued what are my next steps to sort this out,

 

Its not like i can go to court and tell them they are wrong for issuing a CCJ,

i doubt they will like that.

 

have just found out that Welcome finance are claiming last acknowledgment of debt

was 62 months ago (5 years 2 months) from when the CCJ was issued in January 2013.

So now im starting to think ok the CCJ was correctly issued.

 

Fact still remains my outgoing are £200+ more than my incomings per month

and i have priority debts which come first like rent/council tax arrears.

 

So what will happen in court,

 

i prove this and offer a token payment of £1 per month.

 

Will this really be accepted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it matter if you don't tell your credit about move of address ? No

How does creditor chase a debt if they don't have an address for you ?

They are allowed to issue against the last address they have on file for you (i.e. the address you did the runner from).

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

However we are talking about your debt being Statue Barred under the limitations act,

it has nothing to do with your address, whether you did a runner or not, whether you owe the money or not.

 

It is purely about time, it's why it is called the limitations act.

 

Apart from the fact it is sensible to prevent enforcement after a great lengths of time, there is also another reason.

 

By law businesses and individuals are expected to keep financial records for 6 years, in some cases people are legally obliged to destroy records after 6 years.

 

Since legally we are not expected to keep records for 6 years, and in some cases have to destroy,

how do you expect someone have a fair hearing if there is no records available ?

 

Ok have just found out that Welcome finance are claiming last acknowledgment of debt was 62 months ago (5 years 2 months) from when the CCJ was issued in January 2013. So now im starting to think ok the CCJ was correctly issued.

 

.

 

Quick question, is "Hegartys" or "IND ltd" mentioned anywhere on your paperwork ?

Edited by dx100uk
merge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok have just found out that Welcome finance are claiming last acknowledgment of debt was 62 months ago (5 years 2 months) from when the CCJ was issued in January 2013. So now im starting to think ok the CCJ was correctly issued.

 

Fact still remains my outgoing are £200+ more than my incomings per month and i have priority debts which come first like rent/council tax arrears. So what will happen in court, i prove this and offer a token payment of £1 per month. Will this really be accepted.

 

What acknowledgement of debt ?

 

Don't take their word for this. Was this actually a payment from you or a letter from you admitting that you owed the debt ?

 

I would still check into this.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree it is Statute barred and any Bailiff could only enforce an order on the address on the Judgement not any other address.

 

As you don't live there - what are they going to seize.

 

They could apply for variation but then the issue of Statute barred comes up again.

 

I suggest you look up on the Internet - Limitation Act - Debts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to SAR welcome or get them to provide the PROOF of what they are relying upon to say it NOT SB'd.

 

just on this and the CCJ...

 

the fact that thedebt 'was' probably statute barred at the time of the CCJ, makes no odds to the CCJ.

with the info that was available 'at the time of the CCJ', it means the CCj was properly served.

 

that's what SC are probably referring too.

 

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dx I see where you are coming from and agree with you,

 

however I have a feeling this CCJ will have been taken out by IND ltd,

and in the POC's they will have declared it as being statue barred,

well that's what they did in my case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quick question, is "Hegartys" or "IND ltd" mentioned anywhere on your paperwork ?

 

Hegarty's rings a bell from somewhere but im not sure why.

 

due in court next tuesday 11th June,

 

 

ive very limited time to be deciding if the CCJ was wrongly issued or can be acted upon,

im not going to bet anything in writing from welcome in 2 working days.

Its the court things thats bothering me.

This is a unsecured non priority debt which i cant afford to pay,

i am paying priority debts back which are important and could result in being homeless if i dont stick to.

 

Im not denying i ever had this debt,

i did and what i did by running away was wrong,

but ive matured since then,

but my financials are still a mess,

fact remains i have to pay rent/council tax and this welcome crap is causing the most stress.

 

Ill just go with what documents i can gather and proof of income/outgoings and offer £1 per month for the forseable,

maybe then at least i can be a little de-stressed, i just hope the court accept that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...