Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Intrum SD for old HBOS credit card debt ***Withdrawn***


George43
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1803 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, George43 said:

I am still panicking that i am fighting here without success, read that intrum  managed to find the original agreement in 2019 with M&S signed in 2007. that is strange, do banks even have to keep information for more than 10 years

 

How you can you expect any success you have yet to respond ? Where have you read that Intrum managed to find an agreement in 2019 that was  12 years old ?

 

1 hour ago, George43 said:

I have received a letter from solicitor telling that i should wait until 12 days expire but should send letter to intrum asking not to file a bankruptcy petition until they comply with cca. he said that i can ask then for extension of statutory demand time limits cos creditors compliance with cca request.  any thoughts? thank you

 

You could...this is known as an Invitation to withdraw ....but given that the 18 days is up this Saturday the Applicant is able to proceed to Bankruptcy petition after 21 days and your CCA request 12+ 2 does not expire until next Friday.I personally would proceed with the set a side application and file tomorrow.The Applicant is in receipt of the request and is aware of the time frame to respond and with the full knowledge that should they proceed after 21 days with full knowledge that your CCA request has not been provided would be tantamount to abuse of the court process..

 

Time is tight so if you were to approach the applicant I would advise a phone call for speed...inform them that you intend to submit application tomorrow unless they wish to withdraw and confirm same by email today....as you fully expect they are unable to comply to your section 78 request ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

 

Hello, thank you again for support.

 

I checked intrum received my request on the 14 th, on the same day they've sent me this: 

we do not have payment plan in place with you in relation to your account.

 

following the recent service of stat dem we write to inform you that we are now in position to present a bankruptcy petition against you.

 

once petition is issued the amount payable would increase with expenses, fees and costs including those of the trustee following bankruptcy.

 

the trustee will be invited to liquidate your assets (e.g. Property) with a view of settling this matter.

 

a copy of this letter is retained on our file for later production to the court to demonstrate that every effort has been made on our part to avoid this intended action.

 

It's a good news right?

they don't have the right to petition yet because Stat demand was served on the 30th.

 

also it proves that issuing stat demand I a scare tactics without intention to file bankruptcy.

also the bankrupt would make them at the end of the queue to claim money not want not what they claim in this legter

 

I found this in http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=53600973 forum

Dianna, would you do anything after this response or just wait?

14 Feb 2019 Reply from Intrum Legal Department - They have sent Notices of assignment from M&S to 1st Credit, signed copy of my agreement dated 5th Feb 2007, True copy of agreement at the time the account was opened, true
...
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does not mean they will find yours.....just to clarify you have 18 days from receipt of the demand to either make arrangements to pay all or part of the debt; dispute the debt either partially or entirely; (set a side) or pay the debt immediately. 

 

They have 21 days from the date of service to proceed to a Bankruptcy Petition..in black and white thats this Saturday for you and Monday for them.

 

So its your choice to either phone them or proceed with the application.

 

Here is your IAA...you can edit and complete details,iaa-eng (1).doc

 

You must send 3 copies to the court and attach a copy of the Statutory Demand and your witness statement to each copy

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to ignore their waffle ...follow the procedure.

 

Your witness statement is in post #80 above...it requires headers and finishing with a statement of truth and dated...what help do you require with it ?

 

Also on IAA we need to enter the actual dispute and reason for the set a side...then that's complete.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

o need help with the statement post 80 with the language and to make it more like lawyer language please

 

The reason to set aside would be? 1.disputed debt

2. waiting for Intrum to comply with CCA 

3. Intrum Using statutory demand as a method to collect debts

4. Intrum breach of Insolvency Rules, not following procedures, saying that after only 14 days they have a right to issue bankruptcy petition (today's letter)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you dont need to Legalese the statement.....keep it to your words...you are litigant not a Solicitor.

 

As for reasons for set a side I would put.

 

1. The Petitioner has yet to comply to section 78 request.

2. The Petitioner has not served a Notice of Assignment pursuant to  section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925   and sec 82A of the Consumer. Credit Act 1974.

3. An underlying dispute with the original creditor BOS was never resolved.

4. The demand is dated 17th April 2019 and was served on the 30th April 2019.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't they .....?  Well its up to you if you wish to remove 2.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might be right about notice of assignment, it doesn't look like anything I used to get from Halifax. I also haven't received a letter from Halifax that they assigned this debt to Intrum. Previously with other 4 debt collectors Halifax always sent letters.

the signature as well looks blurred whee in all precious  letters is very clear.

 

I called Halifax last week, they confirmed that the debt was sold to Intrum.

why would Intrum fake notice of assignment if they've bought the debt?

 

CAB just rang me telling that i will have to pay £150  to apply to set aside statutory demand at court. ive read its free?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Notice of Assignment you uploaded in post ~18 may well be from Intrum using Halifax notepaper...difficult to prove...but worth raising it as per point 2.Notice of Assignments can come from either the Assignor or Assignee...but it should at least be on their own notepaper.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No fee to set a side a SD as there is no fee to issue one.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good mornign;  iam confused with following because in old 6.4. was the creditor served. Please help

The names and addresses of the persons on whom it is intended to serve this application are:

Mrs George 43

 

The names and addresses of the persons to whom it is intended to deliver notice of this application are:

Intrum

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes its a terrible confusing bad english laid out form unlike the old 6.4/6.5 forms.

 

Well you are serving so it must be your name and address and Intrum are being delivered notice

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to confirm so you can check I may be wrong......reads clearer in the guidance notes.

 

16       Provide the name and address of anyone on whom the application should be served: IR 2016, r 1.35(2)(h).   Intrum

17       Provide the name and address of anyone to whom notice of the application should be given: IR 2016, r 1.35(2)(i). Intrum

 

iaa-n-eng (2).docx

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also add the the following to your list.....

 

As for reasons for set a side I would put.

 

1. The Petitioner has yet to comply to section 78 request.

2. The Petitioner has not served a Notice of Assignment pursuant to  section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925   and sec 82A of the Consumer. Credit Act 1974.

3. An underlying dispute with the original creditor BOS was never resolved.

4. The demand is dated 17th April 2019 and was served on the 30th April 2019.

5. The applicant request any incurred costs in this application

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can i add that the respondent breached because they sent me letter 14 days after the serve of demand saying that now the have a right to procede with bankruptcy petition.

  1. The Respondent’s breach of The Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 Rule 10.4.

I am still not sure about serve and notice of application, maybe i dont need both?

 

Breach of insolvency rules:

demand dated 17, served on 30th, letter dated 14.05 claiming that they have the right for bankruptcy petition already

Link to post
Share on other sites

No point as you know its not true,they know its not true and just a form of intimidation to put pressure on you....wont help in the matter of setting a side keep to the facts. 

 

Obviously some desk jockey has looked at the date on the SD rather than the deemed served date.

 

If anything attach it to the SD for the court to see but you make no mention

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

:becky: And all's well that ends well.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...