Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I think it is too difficult for any party leader to negotiate withdrawal from the EU on their own. It will always be a cross party task, unless there is a General Election and the country gave the the Tories a big majority. But at the moment that is very unlikely.
    • Can anyone help me. I am stuffed.    PayPal allowed me to deposit £4.4k into a gambling website when I had no cash in my bank.    It was the final straw and so I came clean with the wife and joined GA.    I didn't even think to search on the internet, despite how wrong Paypal's actions seemed to me.   This was a few weeks ago and I suffer with depression and anxiety, so all of this just crushed me.   I wake up every day and literally beat myself up.   After a lot of intervention and love I am able to lift my head out of the sand and address what has happened.    Here's the issue:  My wife was getting texts from Nationwide daily saying '£1,700 is due out of your account tomorrow' and so she found the money, and transferred it in.    We took on debt of £3k and Paypal have managed to get their hands on c£4k.    My Paypal balance is now -£420.   I initially posted this in the wrong place and dx kindly offered some advice.    yes I would get all the payments back from NW under chargeback and remove that account as a payment method to PP as well as you say via CPA..   I am not embarrassed to say that I don't understand how this works and the call to the bank is filling me with dread.    What do I need to say to the bank when requesting a charge back? Does this fall under unauthorised transactions?   PayPal aren't letting me remove the bank as a payment method atm.   Trying to not get my hopes up as this would be so huge for me and my family.    Truly grateful for any help.    Pierre  
    • Thank you so much for the reply and apologies for swearing. Will start a new topic.   Pierre
    • you need to create a new topic of your own please   hit create in the top red banner. please don't swear either..post above edited.   yes I would get all the payments back from NW under chargeback and remove that account as a payment method to PP as well as you say via CPA..   dx  
    • Can anyone help me. I am stuffed because of this exact thing.   I was allowed to deposit £4.4k into a gambling website when I had no cash in my bank.    It was the final straw and so I came clean with the wife and joined GA.    I didn't even think to search on the internet, despite how wrong Paypal's actions seemed to me.   This was a few weeks ago and I suffer with depression and anxiety, so all of this just crushed me.   I wake up every day and literally beat myself up.   After a lot of intervention and love I am able to lift my head out of the sand and address what has happened.    Here's the issue:  My wife was getting texts from Nationwide daily saying '£1,700 is due out of your account tomorrow' and so she found the money, and transferred it in.    We took on debt of £3k and Paypal have managed to get their hands on c£4k.    My Paypal balance is now -£420.   Nationwide are closed now I will call in the morning to cancel the CPA / DD.   Do I log a fraudulent payment claim against all of this? Or do I not have a leg to stand on now that I have paid? Should I contact the financial ombudsman?    Any advice would be appreciated.   I have payday loan repayments of £1,800 a month atm. and £4k would clear the majority of that debt... I have a 7 month old daughter and my Wife is on maternity etc. etc.   Suffice to say that the situation is dire.    Thanks if you read this far.   Pierre        
  • Our picks

    • Future Comms issues. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416504-future-comms-issues/
      • 3 replies
    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
        • Like
      • 0 replies
firstship

rent in advance

Recommended Posts

Have lived in the same private rented property for 20 years, always paid rent on time.The property is still owned by the same landlord.recently they have changed agents,and on the instruction of the Landlord they are asking for 33% increase in rent = to an extra £220 per month.I have in my possession a letter from the previous agent who,s contract and arrangements the current agent has agreed they will honour, the letter states as I have spent a substantial amount of my own money improving the property and gardens and under the circumstances they would never ask for more than a 10% increase. The Landlord wants us to sign a new agreement which will make all previous contracts etc null and void,I have refused to sign it at the present time.

 

How do I stand legally ????? if any body can help

 

thank you FS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved the relevant forum...please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What sort of tenancy contract do you have?

 

If you have an assured shorthold tenancy (AST) you may have few rights. Other sorts of tenancy may give you better rights.

 

ASTs are the norm now, but I'm not so sure about 20 years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi yes it is AST, I signed a contract 20 years ago and have not signed one since,and paid the rent increases when asked which have been around 8%, and all the research I have done assures me that I appear to be stuffed,and my letter confirming that 10% would be the maximum increase is not worth the paper it's written on

 

Regards FS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have lived in the same private rented property for 20 years, always paid rent on time.The property is still owned by the same landlord.recently they have changed agents,and on the instruction of the Landlord they are asking for 33% increase in rent = to an extra £220 per month.I have in my possession a letter from the previous agent who,s contract and arrangements the current agent has agreed they will honour, the letter states as I have spent a substantial amount of my own money improving the property and gardens and under the circumstances they would never ask for more than a 10% increase. The Landlord wants us to sign a new agreement which will make all previous contracts etc null and void,I have refused to sign it at the present time.

 

How do I stand legally ????? if any body can help

 

thank you FS

 

 

 

Hi yes it is AST, I signed a contract 20 years ago and have not signed one since,and paid the rent increases when asked which have been around 8%, and all the research I have done assures me that I appear to be stuffed,and my letter confirming that 10% would be the maximum increase is not worth the paper it's written on

 

Regards FS

 

 

 

The date you 1st moved in is very important, can you find out the exact date you moved in ?

 

If you moved between 15 January 1989 and 27 February 1997 and your landlord did not give you a notice (section 20) saying that you have an assured shorthold tenancy

 

You may have a Assured tenancy "AT", signing a AST will Not take your rights away if you do have a "AT"

 

http://england.shelter.org.uk/get_advice/private_renting/private_renting_agreements/assured_tenancies

 

You may be able to challenged a rent increase if you do have a "AT" via the rent assessment committee.

 

 

.


Just say No to 0870 and 0845 Numbers,Use

http://www.saynoto0870.com/search.php

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If an AST, LL can serve s13 to increase rent. You will have 28 days to challenge increase with FTT, previously RAC.

Any work you did may not be considered, just Assessment of current local area market rent for similar property.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for delay.Moved in on June 1st 1997 the contract is AST 6 months ,always paid the rental increase when asked for, the increases where sensible amounts around the 10% mark,so a 30%+ increase was a shock. The Landlords agents have come back to me and state the letter from the agents stating my rent would not increase more than 10% can not be considered as part of the original contract, which I find strange?

Assuming I accept the increase(to allow me to find another place to live) do the landlords agents have to give me a full clear months notice in writing of the increase and further do I sign the new AST contract?

 

Thank you FS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like they have asked you to sign a new contract. You can refuse to sign the contract, in which case they would need to give you 2 rental months' notice to leave using a Section 21 notice.

 

Have they already issued a Section 21 notice? If so then the 2-month clock would have already started ticking.

 

Once the 2 months is up you would be expected to leave and if not the agents could start legal eviction proceedings.

 

When you say past rent rises have been around 10% I assume that does not mean 10% every year! Have you looked at other properties to see whether you could get a similar place for a similar price? You do have the option of negotiating, particularly if you think you are asking more than the market rate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve_M,Yes they are wanting us to sign a new contract,to date not signed it. No Section21 involved.

We will agree to the increase to enable us to have time to find a new place.

The rent increase has never exceeded 10% and the increases have varied in time sometimes 2 years, sometimes 4 years as and when the Landlords agents have asked for a rent increase,we have paid it

My biggest concern is on behalf of the Landlord the agents put in writing that the rent increase would not exceed 10% due to being a good tenant and spending a large amount of my own money improving the property and gardens, but the current agents (same Landlord) say the letter does not form part of the contract and they will ignore it.Hence a new contract being offered .I appreciate whatever I do the landlord is in the driving seat and can give us notice at any time.

FS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you sign a new AST with min 6 month fixed term , LL cannot serve s21 before end of month 4 and you cannot vacate before end of fixed term.

Pay requested rent increase but DO NOT sign a new AST so you remain on SPT. IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know the landlord personally? having been a good tenant for 20 years would it not be possible to speak to him/her direct and ask to consider your past record.


Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply's,I will hold out against signing a new contract as long as possible.

 

The landlord who I have only met once has passed the running of the estate to her son and his wife the latter looks after the housing stock,and in a short time has built a reputation for being extra tough,,I offered to pay 15% but she will not budge she wants 30%+ because she through her agents states she can get that type of rent,on the open market.

 

If I try to enforce the 10% letter I am convinced she will give us notice

 

FS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh what a tangled web-

The 10% increase letter from previous Agent has no validity.

Unless orig LL signed property over to her son/his wife, the son/wife can only act as Agent for her.

Ask son/his wife to serve you with a s13 Notice notifying you proposed rent increase, then ask FTT of LVA to adjudicate new, binding rent for next 12 months.

Prepare for s21. DO NOT sign a new AST.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mariner51 many thanks for your helpful response,see how it goes over the next few weeks

 

thank you

FS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update on this situation,I have agreed a new rental for the property,which is fine at present so I am presented with a new AST 6 months to sign.Under the heading RENT it states" rent means monthly rent £XXX or such other rent as shall be substituted therefor following review".Which in normal speak I think means after 6 months they can increase the rent and or they can increase the rent any time they wish.Or am I misunderstanding the wording???

 

FS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Protected Tenancy or Regulated Tenancy having problem understanding these.

Private Tenant since June 1997 same property same landlord

Last AST expired March 2018

Facing another huge rent increase

Have always paid rent increases

Asked the Landlord to apply small rent increase every 2 years or so

Landlord through Agent stating they can get at least £400 to £500 more than the rent I am paying

I argue Have been a good tenant for 23 years and always paid my rent on time and look after the property over and above the Norm,they are not interested

Am I a Protected or regulated Tenant????? and what are my rights ,if any????

 

Thanks in advance

FS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the lettings forum, people should be along later to advise you.

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A protected tenancy is one which is regulated by the statutory code set up by the Rent Act 1977.

 

This applies to most tenancies which started before 15 January 1989 (when the new code set up by the Housing Act 1988 came into force).

 

The main effects of this are:

 

The tenant can register a ‘fair rent’ which is then the only rent the landlord is allowed to charge

The tenant can normally only be evicted if he is in arrears of rent (sometimes) or if the landlord is able to provide ‘suitable alternative accommodation’, and

If the tenant has a spouse or family member living with them at the time or their death, they will inherit either another protected tenancy (if they are a spouse) or an assured tenancy (which also has long term security of tenure!)

 

The effect of all this is that a Buyer is stuck with a tenant who you cannot evict and who is usually entitled to pay a rent which is considerably lower than the market rent you could have charged had the property been an AST.

 

You state yours started June 1997 ?

 

Does your tenancy agreement state protected ?

 

Andy


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It wont be protected.

Op states they have been inthe property for 23 years.

Protected came into force for tenants for before 1989, some 30 years ago therefore cannot be protected

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply's No the last AST which expired March 2018 does not show the words Protected Rent,as sgtbush states I thought this applied to pre 1989 tenancies

Would Regulated Tenancy apply???? or be advantages ????

Thanks

FS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regulated / Protected are one and the same...as per my previous post....

 

A protected tenancy is one which is regulated by the statutory code set up by the Rent Act 1977.

 

This applies to most tenancies which started before 15 January 1989 (when the new code set up by the Housing Act 1988 came into force).

 

You state yours started June 1997


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your responses,I am now clear on what these tenancy types mean

 

FS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How much is a huge rent increase ? What does it state in your tenancy agreement with regards to rent reviews ?

 

https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/private_renting/assured_shorthold_tenancies_with_private_landlords


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Protected Tenancy or Regulated Tenancy having problem understanding these.

Private Tenant since June 1997 same property same landlord

Last AST expired March 2018

Facing another huge rent increase

Have always paid rent increases

Asked the Landlord to apply small rent increase every 2 years or so

Landlord through Agent stating they can get at least £400 to £500 more than the rent I am paying

I argue Have been a good tenant for 23 years and always paid my rent on time and look after the property over and above the Norm,they are not interested

Am I a Protected or regulated Tenant????? and what are my rights ,if any????

 

Thanks in advance

FS

 

 

Hello firstship

 

Sorry. but you don't have a regulated/protected tenancy as per section 1 of 1977 rent act https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/private_renting/regulated_tenancies

 

If you moved on or after 28 February 1997, you only have a Assured short hold tenancy "AST" https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/private_renting/assured_shorthold_tenancies_with_private_landlords

 

As for your rent increase, have a read of this https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/private_renting/rent_increases

 

Good luck


Just say No to 0870 and 0845 Numbers,Use

http://www.saynoto0870.com/search.php

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

45002 thanks for your trouble will read your links

thanks

FS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...