Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for the above Andy. I’ve not stated to Shoosmiths that I have not signed the agreement, however at the time I didn’t really understand the agreement, it was just put in from of me, and told to sign. I did also sign a document saying it did not require legal representation.   What would you suggest as my next steps? 
    • Barclays have finally responded to my friend on this asking for  Date of birth, all previous addresses, any former names and account numbers she has.   I don’t think my friend included a council tax bill (I did when I sent my Dad’s DSAR to Barclays last week!).   Do they need all this info?
    • There is no statutory provision requiring a witness in these circumstances to be independent. However the purpose of having a witness is so that they can provide unbiased evidence of what was signed and by whom, if required in the future. Therefore a witness should be independent and it is best practice to interpret this widely. A witness should not be the signatory’s spouse or partner or a family member, and should not have a personal interest in the provisions of the document. Case law has confirmed that a party to the document cannot act as a witness to another party’s signature. It is advisable that a witness is aged eighteen or over.   More importantly ...One of the distinguishing factors about the execution of a deed as compared to a contract is that a deed must be “delivered”. Delivery fixes the date from which the executing party is bound by the deed, and once delivered, a deed is irrevocable in the absence of an express right of revocation. At common law, a deed is delivered when a party expresses an intention to be bound by the deed, even if it retains possession of the document.   The best way to deal with delivery of a deed is to have clear wording in the document setting out that the deed will be delivered on the date appearing at the head of the document. Where a deed is executed by a company, legislation provides that it is presumed to be delivered on execution, unless a contrary intention is proved. There is no such presumption for execution by an individual. Clear wording in the document confirming the position on delivery will avoid confusion and unintended consequences.   https://www.osborneclarke.com/insights/signed-sealed-delivered-execution-of-deeds-and-documents-and-how-it-might-go-wrong/
    • ok increased to 3.5mb now and numbered and titled each page   FYI- the quality of the terms are unreadable even before scanning   thanks jpg2pdf(1).pdf
  • Our picks

    • Future Comms is a Big Con. How to get out of it. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/417058-future-comms-is-a-big-con-how-to-get-out-of-it/
        • Like
      • 4 replies
    • Future Comms issues. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416504-future-comms-issues/
      • 5 replies
    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
goaliesmum

GE Money Store card - Santander PPI Redress via Axa ex-Financial Insurance Group - is this redress correct

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Good morning

 

My claim for misselling on a Dorothy Perkins card taken out in store in 1997 has been upheld by FOS.

 

I have had an offer from Santander and unsure if I should accept or question the calculation.

 

They have stated they have full account details from 2005, prior to that they have details of PPI payments and my spending history.

 

They have reconstructed the account with this info but ask if I have any other statements, in line with FOS rules.

 

I do have some earlier statements and in particular in 2002/3 I had a loan and paid off the account but then used again in a small way from 2004.

 

If they have assumed minimum payments throughout the calculation with no clearing of the balance what effect might this have on the end result, good/bad?.

 

I don't see how they can work out when the account went into credit if they do not have payment history, or does spending history include payment details.

 

Sorry if I'm asking something unanswerable but hoped someone may know. After a 10 year wait and finally getting here I am loathe to accept without checking if possible

 

Many thanks for any help

Edited by goaliesmum
spelling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whilst the card is in debit you get that months PPI payment back at their int rate compounded till they stopped their int

if the card goes into credit, you get 8% statutory interest until they settle.

 

have YOU got all the statements and info they have via an SAR before you started the claim?

if not you don't stand a chance in hell of calculating if they are correct without them.

 

see my sig below


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.  I've got more info and statements pre 2005 from SAR in 2009  but they were unable back then to provide further back than 2003 and incomplete, some dates missing. 


I do have the statement from 2003 showing the NIL balance and need to check the loft but you are right not ALL back to 1997.

 

I was wondering what impact a NIL statement for a year or 2 made compared to them making assumptions there was a small running balance throughout.

 

Thank again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the small bal includes ppi it will

 


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks   When I paid the balance off the account is in credit sooner, much longer and for a larger amount with the ppi payments and associated interest removed. So would think more stat interest would be due.

 

I'll bite the bullet and give them a call.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to read the guide either here below or on the FOS website upon how redress is calculated to understand what you should get back properly.

 

ill explain it briefly later if I have the time.

pers i'd never ring a creditor as it only leads to further confusion

writing only.

 

im actually quite surprised they are even entertaining the refund

as 99% of these cards were EX GE Money cards, and they never refund and your have to go after the underwriters..interesting.

 


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx100uk.

I have read through and will do so again.

 

It is the issue of being in credit and whether it is worth letting them know I have paperwork to back it up.

 

Would their reconstruction of the account get to a credit balance lower, meaning less stat interest added if they have assumed minimum payment and aren’t aware it was paid off in full and nil for a while.

 

Though I suppose the fact there were no ppi premiums would tell them that.

 

So probably just accept it’s correct as the breakdown shows they have followed fos guidelines for redress. 

 

To be clear Santander are handling the claim but redress is being made by Axa who I believe took over Financial Insurance Group

 

thanks again for your time 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the info they have results in more 8% than should be, then pers i'd give them the info

As if you paid and they now knew that

the compound int would be a far greater sum for that period

 

Nice work on FIG now Axa 

Thats will be useful to other GE Money store card reclaimers.

Many are stalled here not finding out the info


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...