Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The digital bank has introduced three new plans - Extra, Perks and Max - replacing its existing Plus and Premium plans for new customers.View the full article
    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Future Comms issues - joseph Stickler


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1776 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

 signed up to this contract around about Jan 2018 - I didn't have a buy out fee from my original provider as I was nearly at the end of my time with Three ( luckily) . 

 

I set up a Direct Debit and noticed quite quickly that the bills were always slightly higher than what was agreed, but only slightly so didn't take much notice as I thought it would be hotspot wifi etc.  And then 12 months into the contract Future Comms rang again offering an early upgrade.  We agreed and with the upgrade they offered two promotional sim cards, we have the voice recording from Future Comms and the promotional sim cards and the new contract was going to cost us £165.00 + VAT with a pay back of £58 a month - and the promotional sims were included in the deal and it would cost an extra £9 a month.  An extra £9 was checked, checked and double checked by us on the call recording and it was confirmed it would only be an extra £9 a month.   This is when it all started to go wrong. 

 

We received the sim cards and bunged them in a drawer and have never used them.   You don't ever receive a copy of your bill, so its kinda pot luck what the DD is going to be.  The last DD I let go out of the bank was for over £400 and I didn't have £400.  We called Future Comms and questioned it and they then sent us two previous bill and our future bill.  The next bill we were due to pay after the £400 bill was for almost £1000.  They hadn't capped the 50gb and in one day we'd managed to rack up £400+ in charges and to this day we've no idea why.  They're saying that we went over the allotted 50gb .  I also noticed on this bill that  the 2 free promotional sim cards were being charged at £99 a month each.  When we questioned Future Comms they said that although it said it on the bill,. it wasn't actually being charged, it was a legal thing,  although when you added it all up - we were being charged????   Future Comms were frquently lying to be at this point to get me off the phone.  

 

The monthly payback payments have been hit and miss.  Up until the upgrade they were as regular as clockwork, when we stopped paying they stopped (quite rightly) and now they're paying £35 a month now I'm in a payment plan.   No idea why its decreased as the payments are still the same.  My bills are still sky high.  

 

We've phoned them countless times since, raised a complaint through their official complaint process with no reasonable answer.  Emails go unanswered.

 

I'm now in a payment plan with O2 because I can't afford the bills.  I'm actually paying less on that than by bills are?!  O2 have been amazing and have promised not to cut us off - as they're aware its a business phone.  

 

Future Comms have finally agreed they've overcharging me and agreed to pay me £470.  They even took my business bank details to pay the money - which to date, I've not received.  They keep changing the goalposts and have since said because I'm in a payment plan they can't pay me back the money.  I refuted this as nonsense as the money is rightfully O2's ( not even mine! ) so have asked them to pay it directly to O2 which they've also said no to.  Apparently now, the terms and conditions I've signed state this.  I've asked them to single out the term that states that if I can't pay the bill and enter into a repayment plan, any money Future Comms owe me will be with held until the payment plan is clear.  They're now ignoring me.

 

I've also been told that I'm not allowed to phone them anymore, as I've upset Faye too much because I used the word "crap" and accuse them of fraudulent activity.    Although I do still phone them, I've emailed Faye and she's not replied.  And that was at the end of last week.  As I'm such an unreasonable customer and our relationship has broken down I've asked them to release me from this contract which they've also refused.

 

This may be a bit jumbled but so much has happened that its hard to remember what happened when.  I now want to take legal action.   

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for your post.

Please will you monitor with straight for a fuller response today or maybe tomorrow. I'm afraid I'm away at the moment.

one thing that puzzles me is that you seem to be saying with you or paying future comms directly. as far as I understand the usual arrangements people normally pay their money directly to O2.

I will probably have to ask you to clarify some issues.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, you have said that the figure seems to be going up and down – but you seem to be fairly clear that they owe you at least £470. Is this correct?

I understand that they are now saying that they cannot pay you this because you are a in an instalment plan with O2 – but they won't tell you where in the contract it says that they are entitled to do this.

I'm extremely sceptical of this because I've looked through their contract albeit briefly and I haven't noticed any kind of relationship between Future comms and O2 that would allow this kind of behaviour. I don't see that Future comms occupies a guardianship role over money that might be owed to 02.

I'm afraid – like everyone else – you are going to be obliged to take legal action against them and that means beginning a small claim in the County Court. It's very easy. It's risk-free – almost. The only problem one concerned with is that if you eventually win – which I'm sure you will, whether it is easy to enforce judgements against future comms. They seem to be behaving with impunity and I wonder if in some way they feel that they can't be touched even in the event of a judgement and bailiffs or even High Court enforcement officers visiting them.

The only other thing to add is that I believe that you are operating as a small business and this means that there is a risk that if you sue Future comms and it goes to a hearing then you will have to visit their local county court to attend the hearing and this could be onerous for you – although on the basis that you win you will also be able to claim your reasonable costs and travel. We would try to help you present circumstances to the court in order to encourage them to transfer the hearing to your local court that one can't be certain that this will work – so this is something you need to be ready for.

I think it's a shocking situation. The – as far as I can tell – hundreds of similar stories that are appearing on trust pilot and elsewhere about Future comms is quite extraordinary and I feel very sorry for the decent small business people who find that their bank balances, the telephone services – and generally speaking their small businesses are at risk. £470 may not sound much but frankly I think it's quite substantial sum – not to mention the stress and disappointment associated with it.

There is a threshold of £600 – and if you were able to bring an action for £600 or more, then you could begin enforcement proceedings by using the High Court enforcement system. These people have very serious teeth and also it's extremely expensive – not for you – but for future comms. If Future comms were to receive a visit from the High Court Enforcement Officers then I'm quite sure that they would pay up immediately or else face losing computer equipment et cetera and they would also be faced with a bill of as much as £2000 simply to pay for the collection. This is a serious weapon. Unfortunately nobody has come to this forum yet with that kind of debt being owned by Future comms.

Can you confirm that the figure is £470 and is it going up every month or what?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Please can you copy this into a new thread. It's better if you have your own story running and it's less confusing for people who want to help you https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/87-telecoms-mobile-or-fixed/

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Future Comms or Future Conns as I call them are a Complete con. Please do not hessitate and contact FCA and Ofcom immediately whom are their regulators. Only by volume of complaints can any action be taken against them. So your single complaint counts for a lot. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • BankFodder changed the title to Future Comms issues - joseph Stickler
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...