Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, my initial view is that @unclebulgaria67 is probably right and that because it was a magistrate's warrant, it would be the energy company that would have been in control of the situation directly. Unfortunately this will be much more difficult to deal with then dealing directly with Marston but anyway if you give us your details as requested, we can at least get Outlook from that direction as well. I'm also wondering about the position of your landlord in this. As you have taken up a tenancy in a particular property then I would have thought that one of the terms of the tenancy would be that you should be entitled to quiet enjoyment. Although the landlord may say that it is not their fault and it is down to the previous tenant, at the end of the day you have a contract with the landlord who has certain responsibilities. I think we may consider involving the landlord in this as well. You say that there have been letters addressed to the previous tenant. What have you done with those?
    • Yes please. We have certain direct access to Marston and we may be able to get someone to look at this at a senior level. Please email us as requested with your own contact details and name of previous tenant.   We can't guarantee any particular result but we can promise you that it will be looked at.
    • they say in letter dated 20/01/20 that the agreement was terminated on 30 July 2017 and cannot be terminated twice, so your VT request is invalid. startline issued termination or Default notices on the following dates: letter: 30/03/2017 termination notice  liable for payment: arreaers to date : £365.38 the balance of: £10,586.50 total: £10,951.88 7 days notice else ROG+sums outstanding. ....................... Letter: 11/12/2017 Default Notice nature of breach: instalments of £211.73 due 30th each month. action to remedy: payment of arrears £449.23 by 30-12-17 other info: payments to date: £5226.91 outstanding: £9351.89 less rebate: £2251.41 Amount Due: £7100.48 if you act before 30-12-17 and have paid £7056.90 you can VT. ............ Letter: 27-07-2018 Default Notice refs a dn dated:31/05/2016 - there is no such DN in an SAR return. nature of breach: instalments of £211.73 on 30th each month. action to remedy: payment of arrears £226.73 by 15-08-2018 other info: on or after date 27-07-2018 we shall terminate,withdraw possesion and recoversums due upon termination. total paid: £6250.91 outstanding: £7647.28 less rebate: £1590.47 Amount Due: £6065.81 if you act before 15-08-18 and have paid £7056.90 you can VT. ........................  letter: 01-10-2018 termination notice  liable for payment: arreaers to date : £325.06 the balance of: £6079.75 total: £6404.81 7 days notice else ROG+sums outstanding. ……………………...     NEW ORDER STATEMENTS.pdf Doc1.pdf
    • thank you.   have you had issues paying credit before you took any of these out?   i'e were you keeping a good handle upon your credit file and it wasn't shot with any defaults or payment markers during the period when you applied and were successful in getting any of this additional credit?   my thoughts are ...should the above not be the case and your credit worthiness was good... so couldn't p'haps introduce some irresponsible lending complaints in association to them … it might be an idea to give all your creditors the heads up that times are hard and you wish them to help you, as they are duty bound to do, by freezing interest and any penalty fees to allow you to ride out this present financial hardship till things improve ...   how does that sound...   dx  
  • Our picks

oldwivesdebt

robinson way chasing wifes old debt in her maiden name

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 245 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi 

You all helped me out many years ago and really appreciated it.

Today my wife received a letter from Robison Way stating that they have been appointed for HFUKH2L (Ex HPH Ltd).

 

She did have debts going back years ago but dealt with them .

She has no idea what this debt is for as it doesn't state what company she supposed to owe and even so her debts were well over 6 years ago

surely they are statute barred.

 

We have also moved properties in the mean time and the debt has her maiden surname on it as well.

Just wondering whether we should reply in any way or not .

Thanks in advance 

Oldwivesdebt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore them. If they have not provided enough information, this is just a fishing letter. No doubt further letters will be received and they may provide more info.

 

in the meantime, she should check her credit record, just in case anything is noted.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thank you unclebulgaria67. I imagine an onslaught of letter will arrive shortly going by past experience . thank you again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

send them our statute barred letter in the debt collection section of the library

you need to protect against backdoor CCJ's which they will do if they don't get a response.


..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that's what I was worrying about . I know from past experience how these people work but that was from a long time ago. might have thought things might have changed to stop them doing things like that .

thanks 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Statute barred letter sent but this morning my wife had the same kind of letter only it's stating that they are concerned that they hadn't heard from her. maybe letters have crossed .just await the reply to the statute barred letter 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they may choose to pretend to ignore the SB letter but you can bet your bottom dollar they wont try court because they knw that they will only get a costs order against them fro unreasonable conduct rather than a cash settlement.

It is not uncommon for these troglodytes to ignore the law on debt collection because they (a) wnat the money and (b) wont get punished for being naughty

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They might continue to ask for payment saying although they cannot sue for the cash she has a moral obligation to pay them, at which point a Cease and Desist letter might be appropriate.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thank you both .

could you point me in the direction of a Cease and Desist letter please .

Is it in the library anywhere 

thanks again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Youve sent the sb letter

dont enter stupid letter tennis!!


..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, them wasting  a quid a month on sending stupid letters that cant harm you is their loss, not yours

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks 

haven't heard anything yet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well, you wont if they have heeded the SB letter, they arent going to admit they are just a bunch of chancers are they?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One way you might hear something is if they sell the debt on , they get the same treatment SB letter if it did happen.  They should give up if they know, that you know is SB so unenforceable.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...