Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks, so if they say he's past his 120 days, I can tell them they are wrong and it's actually 540 days of the relevant card transaction?
    • In June Boris Johnson told the country it was our patriotic duty to go to the pub (and spread the coronavirus): that having been an effective message, the government is now mandating the early closure of pubs and restaurants in what is being called a “curfew”, as though it were the public and not the government who were a bunch of unruly children. - Steven Poole     and Some real-world Facts from around the world - to counter cjcregg alt-facts/no-facts soundbites from the whitewashing house   Covid mutations including more infectious strains and a strain which appears far more infectious in a major US metropolitan area - but it is still likely the case that only one vaccine will be needed - so far.   https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/world/2020/08/coronavirus-five-out-of-six-covid-19-subtypes-are-getting-more-infectious-study.html   https://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-research-indicates-growing-prevalence-of-possibly-more-infectious-coronavirus-strain-in-houston-area-2020-09-24   https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200924/Molecular-analysis-of-COVID-19s-second-wave-shows-mutant-viruses-linked-to-rapid-spread.aspx   https://bgr.com/2020/09/03/coronavirus-immunity-study-iceland-antibodies-duration/   https://www.health24.com/Medical/Infectious-diseases/Coronavirus/covid-19-study-suggests-one-vaccine-would-be-enough-for-all-coronavirus-strains-20200903
    • Morning  I am sorry for this unacceptable delay on my behalf, however I never thought a simple complaint letter would cause me so much stress along with anger towards this company 🙄 however I only have this weekend to get things rolling. I should be back at hospital Monday (as long as they don't cancel on me again) and won't be upto much for a while from then on 🤔 So please bare with me, I need to condense my letter as it's totally long winded and off in points, I'm taking the advice given for prin 6 and 7, but was also considering prin 9,  Trust is also a major part for me here:  yes I did trust they had my interests and I totally relied on their advice and judgement, which I now know was all given with their own interest in mind not mine and for their own benefit and gains, no to assist me in any way. 
    • General Form of Judgement or Order received.   Upon not being satisfied that the notice of default was served upon the defendant it is ordered that the claim is dismissed.   Thank you all once again.
    • We believe this firm has been providing financial services or products in the UK without our authorisation. Find out why to be especially wary of dealing with this unauthorised firm and how to protect yourself from scammers. View the full article
  • Our picks

    • @curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK - Samsung 75 8K TV - completely broken by Currys. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426151-samsung-75-8k-tv-completely-broken-by-currys/&do=findComment&comment=5069075
      • 4 replies
    • @skinnyfoodco Skinny Foods. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426130-skinny-foods/&do=findComment&comment=5068996
      • 8 replies
    • I’m in desperate need of help
       
      I bought some clothes online in may through Evans and paid through PayPal
      returned them all seven days later
       
      I waited the 14days for my refund and no refund came
      I put in a dispute through PayPal but I didn’t get any emails to escalate the case - PayPal closed it. 
      evans said they couldn’t refund the money because PayPal have cancelled the refund because of the open dispute
       
      I contacted PayPal
      they said the dispute had been closed but Evans at no point had attempted a refund.
      fast forward to today
       
      I’ve got copies of numerous messages sent to and from twitter messages as it’s the only way I can contact them
      I’ve also contacted their customer service too
      all I get is PayPal have cancelled refund because dispute is still open.
       
      I have proved that the dispute is closed
      I have got an email saying that if Evans sent the refund they would accept it
      but up until the date I got the email they have not once attempted a refund .
       
       I have sent them a letter before court email
      I have even offered to have the full refund as a gift card just to get this sorted !
       
      I’m literally at the end of my tether and don’t know where to turn next !
       
      i suffer with mental health issues and this is affecting my health and I’d saved the money for a year to buy these clothes as I’m on a low income .
    • In desperate need of help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/425244-in-desperate-need-of-help/&do=findComment&comment=5067040
      • 29 replies

Erudio/drydens - PAP LOC - They have neither my address nor phone [poss SB]


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 408 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

I'm yet another victim of the govt loan sell off! 🙄

 

After years of smooth relations with SLC, the transition to Erudio (Red Arrow) was horrible.

 

I complained in 2014 about their handling and their refused my complaint and deferment info, although that same info had worked fine with SLC. I have honestly never been over the threshold and do too much volunteering to feel guilty about being too poor to repay.

 

Because of their aggressiveness, after phone calls etc, I decided in 2014 to ignore everything as a matter of principle.

Time went by and they were aggressively calling me.

I changed my number and eventually, address, but have access to my old post every now and again.

 

Their solicitors say I am obliged to fill in a series of forms within 30 days, as a Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims measure, and that they may take me to court if I do not. They stipulate that legal proceedings may be issued against me in a County Court and then I will be liable for legal fees as well.

 

I do not trust them one jot, and never wanted the loans in the first place, I  remember at freshers fair being actually persuaded to take the loans even though I told them no, because I was brought up to live within my means. I was 18, what did I know?

 

My desperate Qs are:

 

- Can they do all this without my address and number?

The post has never been returned to them as undeliverable, but I could do that from now on.

 

- 6 years from 2014,

can I still inform them that the loan is statute barred

(I learned what that is from this forum, thank you!)

Is it to the exact month and day of the last contact I made with them, please,

and does it still work if they have in the meantime holding court proceedings against me, but without my interaction?

 

- Could they find me anyhow, and threaten to take away my everything?

I have never had a direct Debit with them or the SLC.

 

MANY THANKS FOR ANY HELP. Sleepless nights.

 

Ok since posting this I have answered one my own Qs by reading on here:

 

"If a creditor has already started court action before the end of the limitation period, this doesn’t apply – the debt will never become statute-barred or extinguished. "

 

Therefore they are going to rush this through, probably.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok lots of wrong assumptions there and some of them are very dangerous to continue to follow/believe.

 

firstly.

you should never runaway from any  debt.

if you've moved and you have debts on your credit file and even some not showing, like this one, but within say 7yrs of your last payment/interaction AND you have never informed the current owner [even a dca/debt buyer] or the original creditor of your correct and current address......you must write to each one giving that info else you risk a backdoor ccj.

 

now erudio…[arrow global dca in sheeps clothing]

although a dca has zero legal powers

and are 

NOT BAILIFFS

just like you or I if we think someone owes us money..can raise a court claim.

and that can be to the last known address, so you'd know nowt about It till court or HCEO's come a knocking.

 

you say you've never earned over the threshold ..so you should be ok

[and there is nothing to stop you sending backdated slc forms from this forum later]

 

but you MUST reply to the pap letter within 30 days of its date

what they have done is sent this to see if you reply

if not, as with many others here, they WILL go for a backdoor CCJ..its a phishing letter 

 

what was the date of your last deferment?

 

then...read these threads and follow as appropriate.

 

https://cse.google.com/cse?cx=partner-pub-8889411648654839:3134625398&q=erudio pap letter&oq=erudio pap letter&gs_l=partner-generic.12...0.0.1.11227.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0.gsnos%2Cn%3D13...0.0jj1....34.partner-generic..17.0.0.Duay84yoStQ

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you!

 

Last deferment was 2013 with SLC. Erudio refused all the info I gave them, which is what I had always supplied the SLC, saying they wanted more info.

 

Do I have to give the solicitors DD info? I really don't feel comfortable doing that. I read of countless Erudio mistakes with withdrawals. Am I no longer dealing with Erudio, I'd be happy with that.

 

I have to agree to some payment plan, in my dreams I'd like to dispute the loan entirely on the basis that it was pressed on my when I was teen, and I only defaulted when they sold my loans, otherise I'd be eligible for a cancellation of the debt within some years reaching 50 and always being under the threshold!

 

I'm going to read the thread. Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So youve not contacted anyone since deferment in 2013..when did you send the form in EXACTLY please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I went through all my old papers.

I found a deferment from SLC dated 15th May 2012 saying my deferment period ended on 9/7/ 2012, plus a statement sent by them later that year. So I must have deferred that year.

 

I thought I must have deferred in 2013 but can't find anything.

 

I had some email correspondence with Erudio in May 2014,  in which they responded to my request in early May for a form and sent me the deferment form for 2014, and also contacted me by post later in June only to refuse my application for deferment and refuted my protest against their demands to be forced onto Direct Debit repayments.

 

I looked at the thread you sent me, it's well confusing and many acronyms.

 

I have about 7 more days to deal with this before the "Pre-Action" threat letter deadline from solicitors.

 

What does sending the CCA Request form achieve please?

Is it an recognition of your debt and therefore puts any hope of the loan being statute barred out of joint?

 

What is the difference from emailing them for a SAR

 

Also does the fact that my address has changed and I never told them put me in any vulnerable situation?

 

i see in this other thread you said to write to SLC< even though they no longer own the loan, to inform of new address.

Do I date and sign this letter, please?

 

I am going through the papers again in case I can find some 2013 docs in the meantime....

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so the debt is statute barred then.

send them our SB letter forget the form return.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if that is true I'm defintely donating to this website!

 

Am turning boxes inside out to be sure there was no 2013 deferment, as am not sure 2012 was the last one.  

 

Q:  If I have corresponded with them since 2012, also asked for deferral forms direct from Erudio is that a recognition of my debt, cancelling the Statute Barred?

 

Would it be safer to send a SAR  - if I understand this means the "reply by 30 days or we make take court action" time frame is reset so buys me time - and also confirms at their expense the date of last referral?

 

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR BEING OUT THERE!

Edited by June100
Link to post
Share on other sites

No just send our sb letter

as with all the PAP erudio dryden pap letter threads here already

you must respond if not simply to give them your correct address

to stop a backdoor ccj..which is what this is all about

 

just type erudio dryden pap

in our custom google search box top left

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you I will do.

 

"You have not communicated with the creditor admitting you owe the debt during the last six years."

 

What would be my course of action if they refute the SB letter, stating for example that since I applied to defer the loan in 2014 from Erudio direct, I admitted the debt and communication did not in fact break down.

 

Will I go to Financial Ombudsman for help at that point?

 

I'm not worried about credit scores, in future, just being harassed:

 

"The seven-year mark does not erase the actual debt, particularly if it's unpaid. You still owe your creditor even when the debt is no longer listed on your credit report. Creditors, lenders, and debt collectors can still use the proper legal channels to collect the debt from you. That includes calling you, sending letters, or garnishing your wages if the court has given permission. You can even be sued for a debt if your state’s statute of limitations for that debt is more than seven years."

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure where you got the last bit from..7?

 

just because you or they might have written in all effect makes little diff to if a debt IS SB'd or not,

unless you wrote a letter specifically saying hey yes I owe the money and you sign the letter as such admittance.

but yet again we've never seen a case here on any debt, let alone a gov't derived one whereby such a letter purely lost a case for a defendant.

 

its 6yrs in E&W, yes the debt still exists, just prevents a claimant from enforcing any judgement so they don't bother.

however if you don't know they've gone for a CCJ, they'll win by default as nothing is ever checked on undefended claims.

and that's WHY you must send 'something' with your new address on, so let that be the SB letter.

it cant harm you.

 

 

as with post 2 again lots of your assumptions and information is somewhat flawed

best to stick to cag eh?:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you have quoted below is from a foreign country. The give away, is the last sentence which says about "your states". 

 

"The seven-year mark does not erase the actual debt, particularly if it's unpaid. You still owe your creditor even when the debt is no longer listed on your  credit report. Creditors, lenders, and  debt collectors can still use the proper legal channels to collect the debt from you. That includes calling you, sending letters, or garnishing your wages if the court has given permission. You can even be sued for a debt if your state’s statute of limitations for that debt is more than seven years."

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both, for the advice.

 

I've now sent the letter to the solicitors, with only digital signature and got proof of postage.... let's see!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Hi Y'all!

Here's an update on the Erudio-Drydens attack formula.

 

After I sent the above letter,  they replied in the first week of May to say they confirm receipt and my account is placed on temporary hold while they contact their client with details of the query.

 

Next  I hear from this is yesterday, they send:

 

A copy of the original credit agreement

Copy of the notice of assignment

Copy of the fair processing notice

FAQs

Copy of the Goodbye Letter

Copies of the SLC and Erudio statements

 

"We ask that you now contact us to make payment, if you can't pay the 8-10,000 due by mid July please contact us and we'll agree a payment plan."

 

No mention of the SB letter.

 

I want to ring them with my number barred, and ask what happened to the response to my Statute Barred letter, but am worried they will trick me into something, or take that as a recognition of what they think I owe them.

 

Any advice please!

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't ring them.

 

its not because it can reset anything..it cant ..phone conversations are not admittance

its purely because its a waste of time.

 

next move is not your.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. So shall I write and say, where the hell is the response to my SB letter please?

 

Their latest letter gives me a deadline (soon) by which to pay the whole amount.

 

What if they deny receiving the SB letter?

 

Edited by June100
removing gif
Link to post
Share on other sites

next move is not yours.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

stuff and all.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, but aren't they obliged to acknowledge my notice of Statute Barred?

 

Has my letter stating the loan is SB counted as acknowledging the debt therefore they are back to business as usual, stalking me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now there hardly going to send you acknowledgement agreeing to your letter are they ?

 

And no your letter is not an acknowledgment of the debt. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • dx100uk changed the title to Erudio/drydens - PAP LOC - They have neither my address nor phone [poss SB]
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...