Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Here's a top tip for superefficient catering – saves money – saves time, what's not to like?… Except that if you get it wrong then you're going to be eating it for a long time! Take a large lasagna dish – large enough for a people or six people – as large as you can get. Make your lasagna inside it. Stuff it right to the brim with all sorts of good things including the white sauce/cheese topping. Put it in the freezer. After about 2 1/2 hours, take it out of the freezer. It will started to form ice crystals and should be moderately solid. With a knife, cut through the Sanyo in the dish into for portions or three portions so that you have blocks of two portions each. Work the knife around the edge of the dish so that the site the lasagna is just slightly separated from the edge. But it back in the freezer. 2 1/2 hours later, take it out of the freezer again and put the knife into the pre-existing cuts and make sure that the cuts are still clear. The next day, take the fully frozen lasagna dish out of the freezer, and gently work the cup box of lasagna out, put them straight into freezing bags and into the freezer. Now any time you want lasagna for two, you simply take out a block, defrost it in a smallish lasagna dish and then put it in the oven as usual to heat up and brown on top. As I said in the opening sentence, if you made a mistake then you have a helluva lot of over-sorted/under-flavoured lasagna to get through. Of course you can do the same thing with shepherd's pie, fish pie, moussaka – any dish which is normally put together in this kind of baking dish.  
    • If you purchase with a credit card over £100 then you benefit from protection under section 75 Consumer Credit Act where the finance company effectively has the same liabilities as the retailer who sold you the product. Under £100, you don't get this protection. On the other hand, for purchases under £100 if you use your debit card then you get the benefit of the banks chargeback scheme which basically means that the bank will refund you. I don't understand why you have threaten the retail with the legal action and yet you have not carried out your threat. By doing this, the retailer has called your bluff and you have lost credibility. I think you have to decide whether you want to take this seriously. Please will you post up a copy of the threatening message which you sent to the retailer. Of course Hermes will always try to deflect responsibility on to anybody else – except themselves. Generally speaking when you are dealing with overseas retailers or Packlink – which is Spanish – then you would simply go straight against Hermes. They don't like telling people that they have third party rights under the 1999 act. You have to come here to find out about it. In this case, if the retailer is unwilling to produce the evidence of delivery then I would say that they become the prime target. Please post up the letter which you sent and we will go from there.
    • Hospital Parking Update View the full article
    • Yes retailer has provided tracking and it says delivered with no photo or proof of signature   Hermes won’t speak to me as contract is with the retailer. And retailer just keeps sending me tracking link saying it’s been delivered so not their problem   why would I have been better to purchase via a debit card for under £100 out of interest?   threatened legal action to retailer and they are just ignoring it and send copy and paste tracking link 
    • Thank you. Have you had sight of the tracking details? If you haven't, then I suggest that you contact the retailer and ask them to let you see the evidence they have. In the end you have two options. Because they seem to be a UK retailer, you can threaten them with a legal action. It is their responsibility and frankly for this kind of money they will probably put their hands up. Alternatively you can threaten Hermes because under the contracts (rights of third parties) act you enjoy full contractual rights as if you were a direct contracting partner. Once again, if you bring an action against Hermes, for this kind of money there will probably put their hands up. So you are spoilt for choice as to possible defendants but first of all you need to gather some information and that will involve getting hold of the tracking data from the seller. If they won't supply it to you then I would be bringing an action against them. For future reference, for purchases more than £100 is a credit card. For purchases less than £100 use a debit card
  • Our picks

    • Ahmed Alwaheeb's firms sold cars riddled with faults – and which sometimes had government recall notices. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427369-ahmed-alwaheebs-firms-sold-cars-riddled-with-faults-%E2%80%93-and-which-sometimes-had-government-recall-notices/&do=findComment&comment=5071860
      • 3 replies
    • @curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK - Samsung 75 8K TV - completely broken by Currys. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426151-samsung-75-8k-tv-completely-broken-by-currys/&do=findComment&comment=5069075
      • 8 replies
    • @skinnyfoodco Skinny Foods. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426130-skinny-foods/&do=findComment&comment=5068996
      • 8 replies
    • I’m in desperate need of help
       
      I bought some clothes online in may through Evans and paid through PayPal
      returned them all seven days later
       
      I waited the 14days for my refund and no refund came
      I put in a dispute through PayPal but I didn’t get any emails to escalate the case - PayPal closed it. 
      evans said they couldn’t refund the money because PayPal have cancelled the refund because of the open dispute
       
      I contacted PayPal
      they said the dispute had been closed but Evans at no point had attempted a refund.
      fast forward to today
       
      I’ve got copies of numerous messages sent to and from twitter messages as it’s the only way I can contact them
      I’ve also contacted their customer service too
      all I get is PayPal have cancelled refund because dispute is still open.
       
      I have proved that the dispute is closed
      I have got an email saying that if Evans sent the refund they would accept it
      but up until the date I got the email they have not once attempted a refund .
       
       I have sent them a letter before court email
      I have even offered to have the full refund as a gift card just to get this sorted !
       
      I’m literally at the end of my tether and don’t know where to turn next !
       
      i suffer with mental health issues and this is affecting my health and I’d saved the money for a year to buy these clothes as I’m on a low income .

Advice required re: charging order


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 525 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have a charging order from Nationwide from a credit card. CCJ and CO were from 2009. At the time I tried to defend myself on the lack of a genuine CCA but lost as they provided a reproduced CCA.

 

CO is against house in joint names and having read the forums a bit, the wording of the CO is that they only have to be notified (rather than paid) if the house was to be sold.

 

I've recently divorced and the house is now in the process of being sold and I'm going into rented accommodation. What are Nationwide likely to do if they just get notified of the house being sold and not getting paid off? Will it possibly affect the house sale?

 

I do have a possible option to borrow some money from a family member to settle with them, but in an ideal world I'd rather settle with them from my share of the house sale proceeds (or not at all!!) :)

 

What's the best thing to do next?

 

Thanks for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if its your sole debt on a joint property then its a restriction k 

it can somewhat be ignored

don't tell em you sold the house

is this in nationwides name?

and has not been sold on to a powerless DCA?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply.

 

Yes, it's a restriction. If I was to ignore it, would they be likely to try to use other enforcement methods (debt collectors etc?)

 

Would they not need to be told as part of the house sale as per the charging order?

 

It is still in Nationwide's name.

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dca's are not bailiffs and have ZERO legal powers

All you have to poss do is inform NW once sold

post you something later

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since the Land Registry Rules 2003 took effect in October 2003, a charging order is registered as either an ‘agreed notice’ (shown on the register as an ‘equitable charge’) or a ‘restriction’. Prior to October 2003 where only one of the owners / registered proprietors was the judgment debtor, the order was registered as a ‘caution’. A caution served much the same purpose as a restriction. Any cautions registered before October 2003 will remain on the register.

A notice or restriction does not impose an obligation to make payment when the property is sold. However if the judgment debtor (or any one of the co-proprietors) attempts to dispose of the property, the District Land Registry will advise the claimant of the interest in the property. Prospective purchasers will be wary of buying a property subject to a notice or restriction and, more often than not, will want the notice or restriction removed before completing the sale.

 

The effect of the restriction The debtor and his joint owner’s freedom to sell the property is not affected by such a restriction. They could sell the property as if there was no charging order against the debtor. All that was required was that the new buyers or their solicitor write to the creditor informing them that they now owned the property and then confirm to the Land Registry that they had given that

notice.

 

Then the buyers could register the property with no further complications. The creditor, who is sitting back, waiting to get paid, instead just receives a letter confirming that a sale has already taken place, typically a week or two after the sale so there is little they can do to get the debt paid. In theory the creditor could apply for a freezing order against the debtor to try and obtain the cash from the sale proceeds.

 

However, most creditors will never make such an application: The cost of applying for such a freezing order would run into thousands of pounds. The debtor might have spent the cash from the sale of the property before the freezing order was obtained so there is little, if anything, for the freezing order to bite on.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info Andyorch. What has today happened is that the buyers solicitors are asking for evidence that Nationwide have been informed. So assuming that Nationwide are informed before the sale, is there anything they could do to either stop the sale or claim money as part of the sale?

 

I do still have a possible option of borrowing money from a family member now in order to settle before the house sale, to be repaid from my share of the proceeds. Is this the recommended course of action or am I best sitting tight for now? It's a restriction K.

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its really dependant on how both Solicitors approach it...but if you do not want to complicate the sale probably best to pay it...assuming you agree you owe the debt ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I defended the CCJ in court myself back in the day based on them not having a genuine valid CCA. They submitted a reconstituted agreement and the DJ accepted it and I lost. Probably not worth trying to overturn something from 8 years ago now.

 

Realistically I may just settle it. What I was hoping to do is settle out of my proceeds but there's a possibility of lending from a family member so might have to go down that road.

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply tell your Solicitor to pay it from the proceeds and then deduct from your share of the balance.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've recently managed to agree a reduced settlement with them but obviously when agreeing this, I didn't tell them about the impending sale!

 

The main point for me was if I could sell THEN pay the reduced amount (thereby avoiding having to loan the money) or if I might be able to "get away" with paying them what I currently pay them monthly.

 

Looking at the above, best course of action is probably to clear it now and then it's done. Just not ideally what I wanted to do!

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...