Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver.  (Although earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.  I don't clearly understand it, but legal advice was something to do with the role the receiver has acting as an agent for the borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against the receiver ???).  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate app for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Water Immersion Heater Legal?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1829 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I moved into this property a year ago and the electrician who came out recently to fix a hot water issue wanted to replace this but the landlords wouldn't. 

 

My tenancy is through the council but it's owned by a private company a bit like a housing association.

 

Ive also just got a £600 electric bill for a 3 month period and believe this may be responsible. 

 

I still think it should have been replaced. 

 

Apparently the place was electrically tested before I moved in but I don't believe that because the washing machine plug socket didn't work when I moved in and they had to install a plug under the sink recently so I could use it. 

 

Hope you can help. 

 

Thanks in advance. 

IMG_20190415_181002.jpg

IMG_20190415_174418.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you will probably have to start off by getting your own independent electrical inspection done. If it fails, then I would say that you would be entitled to get the costs of it from your landlord. No doubt there will be trouble about that so come back here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that I don't know the answer to that problem but I am certain that you will be best off getting a completely independent electrical safety inspection and that means from somebody who works for you – and that means that you will have to pay for it. I suppose if you wanted to get the council involved then you might want to make a complaint that your home does not comply with various regulations.

In that case, maybe you should look very carefully at all the regulations in relation to certification, smoke alarms – et cetera et cetera and see whether there is anything in your home which doesn't comply. That might give you the basis upon which to make a complaint. However it is probably all very time-consuming and quite unsatisfactory.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there no mains feed to that so it CANT be the source of your high bills!!

the mains feed has been removed!!

 

that's 1970's vintage tank and immersion heater sp no way would that be working today anyway

immersions last at best 5yrs from that era.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So it’s that old? I thought it was, so it’s still legal? And you say mains feed? It does have a mains.

 

Also the mains for this immersion heater kept tripping my electric a couple of months ago and it totally burnt out in the end and didn’t trip my electric and could have caused issues.

 

The socket and wire had to be replaced and I was without hot water for 4 days because of their very poor response and as a disabled person it caused a lot of issues. 

 

Here is a pic.

 

IMG_20190415_235501.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no fuse in that

there is no wire going into the top of the immersion 

where the masking tape says FAULTY

there should be that white wire feeding into the whole at the side.

 

its dead now.

 

yes it could well have been shorted as that's what they do, get covered in limescale , then that expands and breaks the tube inside

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok well don't show photos that don't show that then eh?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The electrician wanted the whole immersion tank replaced there and then but my landlord who is a private company similar to a housing association refused.

 

This property was provided to me by the council as I was homeless and it’s managed by a letting agency, they are useless to.

 

A few weeks ago the council had words with the landlords and they agreed to swap the whole immersion heater but then went back on that,

 

I will try try and get a better photo sorry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

aha see theres one down the bottom..

and we can see the new switch too..

 

the old one going south could well have caused high electric use yes.

the tank is old yes but doesn't mean its not OK

is could be full of fur and limescale, but I doubt they'd have bothered to fit the bottom element if it was that bad.

the only issue with bottom heating is it uses far more electric to heat the water than the old top feed down element.

sadly what they have done is quite acceptable.

 

are you finding you have to have the thing on for an extended length of time to get the hot water you used to need

and is the water much hotter or colder than how things used to be.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I moved in last year the top one was labelled faulty, it’s always been running from the bottom from start of tenancy, they just replaced the socket and wire so nothing is different but the high electric issue is a big concern considering I live alone in a small flat.

 

The big bill is between December and March, the socket and wire on the immersion heater was replaced around 20th February.

Link to post
Share on other sites

good further info all becoming clearer now when we get the right answers from the right questions.

 

so the bottom immersion was fed from the old top mains feed but that got replaced by the new outlet in feb after it went faulty.

I wouldn't think the old wiring caused your high bill no.

 

p'haps look for other sources of the high bill

how do you heat your home?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest that complain to the council, as you mention that the council arranged the housing and therefore are required to check the standard of accommodation offered by the housing association they outsourced the provision of housing to. 

 

I would not be happy with any immersion heater provision of hot water, as that is a really expensive way to heat water. During the winter with colder water, it can take a couple of hours to heat a tank that size. So if you had the heater on for say 4 hours per day, over 3 months, that would be quite expensive. Then add on other electricity usage and I could see that getting close to £600 for 3 months.

 

The council housing department should take an interest, but if they don't then contact your local councillor.

Edited by unclebulgaria67

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

an immersion heater element at the botton is more efficient than the old ones that were in the top anyway.

 

Will it pass an electrical test?

possibly but that will depend on how old the rest of your household electrical circuits are as the regulations that were in place when they were installed are the ones that apply, not the current ones unless some substantial work has been done.

 

Could this rewire be considerd substantial?

Surface mounted electrics generally arent enough to make the whole thing comply to the modern regs so you will then have to get a test done to see if there is an earth leakage somewhere or a socket is incorrectly wired.

 

what about your portable appliances?

they should be tested as some old stuff may cause problems.

simple PAT test,

no need to strip down double insulated items like playstations etc,

they either work or they dont

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...