Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

 

I will start from the beginning.

 

I had a Renault Clio Motability Car for 8 months, I got permission from Motability to cancel because of worsening health and needing a car that was bigger and higher up so I wasn’t climbing out of it.

Then……..

 

I’ve just got a Renault Captur Iconic.

 

I’m very unhappy with the service I have had, even though the car is ok, I did not get the car that was 100% suitable for me and should have had because firstly at first they were not honest with me and didn’t tell me that they had a Renault Captur GT Line in stock at Renault Aldershot SMC even though they supposedly checked on their system.

 

On Monday 1st April 2019, I ordered a Renault Captur Iconic at My local Renault SMC, it was apparently a car that had already been cancelled and was on the forecourt, I ordered it because they informed me that they did not have a GT Line Captur in stock which is the one that met my requirements and the one I wanted.

However, they were not honest with me and I found out that the other local Renault SMC had one in stock at their branch in the showroom which I could have.

 

So on Thursday 4th April, I went to the other local Renault and I viewed and sat in the Captur GT Line and made sure it was suitable.

Me and Renault agreed I would have it, Even though I already had a Iconic Renault Captur on order from the other local Renault branch, they were happy to change this, so it was all agreed for me to have the Renault GT Line model.

 

This met my requirements because of the height of the seats and the heated seats which would be beneficial for my pain issues.

So it was all agreed but then suddenly when I got home Renault wanted to charge me £215 on top of the £595 advance payment of the car because it had a dashcam installed, I have the emails to prove this also.

 

I spoke to someone from Motability on Friday 5th April regarding this and was told by Motability that if I wanted the car without the dashcam then I could do that and Renault would have to take it off.

 

However, Renault refused and I couldn’t have the car I wanted and which was more suitable and I had to have the Iconic Renault Captur which I really didn’t want. I felt pressured into having it because they wouldn’t let me have the other one unless I paid £215 for the dashcam, making it over £830 in total with the advance payment on top of the dashcam fee.

 

The GT Line version was more suitable for me and that is what I wanted and what me and Renault agreed I was going to have.

 

Then I felt I couldn’t back out for the order of the Iconic Renault Captur so I picked it up on Monday, however the other one is what was more suitable, I definitely felt pressured because of how Renault handled it all.

 

I’m really not happy with this because I haven’t got the model I wanted to have and not only felt pressured but Renault made it extremely hard for me and went against what I was told by Motability.

 

It’s been a stressful experience and after having the opportunity to change my car I’m disappointed that I haven’t got the car that met all of my requirements.

 

As I say I have all emails confirming I wanted the GT Line version and it was all agreed and all emails from both local Renault dealers stating they would go ahead and arrange for me to collect the Renault Captur GT Line model.

 

Plus the emails stating they would charge me £215 for the dashcam and also then refusing to remove the dashcam therefore leaving me with no choice but to have the other car and going against what I was told by Motability.

 

I have several emails that will show all of what I have said.

 

I will also add that I wasn’t given the chance to inspect the car when I collected it and just had to enter the PIN and it had 12 miles on the clock.

 

There were 12 miles on the clock when I picked it up and the colour definitely isn’t Desert There were 12 miles on the clock when I picked it up and the colour definitely isn’t Desert Orange unless I need to go to Specsavers?

 

It was all agreed for me to have the GT Line Captur in Red/Black and even Motability said Renault would have to remove the dashcam if I didn’t want it but Renault refused and I felt pressured into having this car instead, I know I ordered the Iconic first but that was because

Renault were not honest with me and stated they didn’t have any in stock and they only had this.

 

Motability have fobbed me off saying it’s my responsibility even if I did feel pressured but they will refer to the Customer Relations team if I want them to which I will ask them to do so.

 

On 4th April Renault agreed for me to have the GT Line and said they would cancel the order for the Captur Iconic, I have that in writing.

But Renault didn’t cancel it, they started playing hardball regarding paying for the dashcam in the GT Line Captur and I ended up having to have the Iconic lower model without things like the heated seats which I wanted and needed.

 

Renault also failed to offer or provide a test drive in either car.

 

Do I have a case?

 

I have requested that Motability escalate it, if I’m not satisfied with the response then I can go to the Ombudsman.

 

Edited by thecookiemonster

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

What you need to bear in mind is that your agreement/lease agreement of the vehicle is with Motability.

 

Have you checked Motability Website to see if that model with dash cam is listed? (take a screenshot)

Was it specifically Renault's Motability Adviser you dealt with for the vehicle and change of vehicle at
a Motability accredited Dealership/Franchisee? 

 

Did you inform Motability of the Vehicle Change and it was accepted by Motability? (if so did they inform
you of a possible excess charge and do you have it in writing?)

 

What does the documents/agreement you signed say about the vehicle change and any excess etc? (or has
this been done electronically to Motability? (did you digitally sign i.e. using a eletronic pencil & pad)


How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?





  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if you go to the dwp website there is an online SAR you can fill in to get all the details.   here is your old thread mentioned above  
    • Thanks for the advice, I will call the council Tuesday morning and see what they say, and then send the I/E form.   Something doesn't sit right with me on the whole thing.    I found an email I had sent to my MP early 2008 detailing the problems we were having with tax credits, and I go into great detail of our situation and  employment history.   Work was sporadical and I am pretty sure we were on benefits throughout one of those whole periods (I even had a post on here about the bank charges problem)   In fact most of those time periods mentioned in post 4 there was little work. Worst 2 years of our lives! I dont know how to find records of benefits though for that long ago.
    • I won a prize in a Raffle operated by an organisation holding an event at a local venue. The prizes were displayed on video screens in the venue and on a printed list by the person selling the tickets.  The prize I won was stated as "4 (four) weekend VIP tickets to Birmingham Pride"   - I did not open the envelope until the following day - it contained 3 (three) vouchers for weekend "Premium" tickets to Birmingham Pride (Premium being a lower priced ticket than VIP).   A friend who was at the event with me had the phone number of one of the organisers - there being no other obvious way to contact them - the person confirmed the prize was stated as 4 tickets, it was supposed to have been changed to 3, but that it had not been done.   I considered that this was suspicious, I can accept it might not have been possible to change the wording on the video screens, but the person selling the tickets could have clarified this verbally, and could have altered the "4" on the printed sheet to show "3".    As "compensation" I was offered free entry to their next event. That would be £7 per person (if they intended to include anyone else I was attending with) which in no way equates in financial or entertainment value of the Pride event, which has tickets priced £88.00, for two days of live acts including Marc Almond, Faithless and Human League.   I would like to know if the offer of prizes as originally stated and the exchange of money for entry in the raffle constitutes an intent to create legal relations - and as such, that I am entitled to 4 (four) VIP tickets (not Premium) and nothing else other than a cash alternative of equal value to the expected prize.   Incidentally, the vouchers state to send an email to an email address at birminghampride.com – which I did several weeks ago, but have not received any response.   I assume even if the Pride organisers fail to respond, the raffle organiser is still liable.
    • you realise Gick its very easy to make win 10 look like win 7.? I wouldn't move from 7 because I do lots of RS232 and other basic comms stuff with vintage gear and past 7 it would not longer do what I want.   win10 put everything back and works better than 7  ive even got it on a very old 1gb ram vio pc  if you want help pm me and I can sort things for you. 
  • Our picks

    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
        • Like
      • 0 replies
    • 30 Day Right To Reject - Vehicle Casualty Report. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415585-30-day-right-to-reject-vehicle-casualty-report/
      • 57 replies
×
×
  • Create New...