Jump to content


3 month warranty

Recommended Posts


i bought a used car from a garage i found through ebay ( the car was advertised on there ) i px my car in which was an ex police car .

They said they wanted my car plus £4000 i agreed and we were set.


Tthe day i was coming he said he didn't want my car as it would be hard to sell being an ex police car.

he then said i would need to pay £5500 - i thought ok ill have to do that. 


I had 4 new tyres on my car and it was valeted first.

he had asked if there was anything wrong with my car

i said no, it had a paint chip on boot but nothing mechanically wrong.


I said when i pulled up to swap,

do you want to have a drive in mine,

he said no and didn't even look inside ,


i spent £50 getting it cleaned

was a bit surprised

went ahead with the sale .


The car i bought ( a range rover ) came with 3 month engine warranty at their garage.

i signed and went home with my new car.


next day it starts creaking

we had new arms and bushes on it and a new tyre.


It was then we noticed an oil leak in the engine which the garage we went to could be a seal or pump.

I suddenly thought oh right this may be covered under my warranty for the engine

( i have had the car less than two weeks )


I text the man i bought it off he said.

Yes we can fix it but we found problems with your car such as the holes where the police radio etc went ,

they are tiny holes in all ex police cars and


said the brakes needed doing

if i wanted my car fixing i would need to give him money to cover "his losses" on my old car.


I don't know what my rights are or if i should even pursue that they fix the car

- its a 2011 range rover vogue 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would hazard a guess that even if you went along with it, you wouldn't get your new vehicle repaired correctly – or at all.

Under the consumer rights act, you are entitled to reject the vehicle if a defect appears within the first 30 days. However we are finding that there are difficulties in enforcing this – especially when it comes to second-hand car dealers – and I can imagine eBay traders are even more difficult.

I think that the holes et cetera which have been discovered on your old car I neither here nor there. Of course it's just an excuse to try and set something else off against the problems with the car that you have bought. You are a private seller – and he is a dealer and he should be on enquiry about this kind of thing. Plus, as you say, it is a police car and radio holes et cetera come with the territory.

I don't think he has any rights in respect of you.

I think that you have excellent rights in respect of him – but I shudder to think that the problems you are going to have enforcing them. Another problem is that if you try to get it fixed by him, you will lose the car for a while. You will have no guarantee as to the quality of the work and from the sounds of it, he sell shabby cars and will carry out shabby work.

I'm not saying that anyone who spends £4000 on a range Rover should expect this kind of tat – but I am saying that one should be very careful of dealers who are selling off range Rovers for £4000. You can imagine that the dealer probably only paid £3000 for it or even less.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi the car was actually £12000! i had to put £5500 cash towards it and my bmw 530. 


I would just like to text him back and say legally you should be repairing my car under its warranty so i can show i know my rights. I think he thinks he's dealing with an idiot.

Am i entitled to say that i would accept cash for the repairs to avoid taking further?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bankfodder, don’t you think you should start to give the correct advice about the 30 day right to reject rule.

As per section 19 subsections 14 & 15 and as explained so eloquently by ReasonableRon. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

i don't want to send the car back though its good to know the law on this, id just like to know my rights to get this oil leak covered. its a £13000 car so not some cheap crap that i expect issues on.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morgan, you can only reject within 30 days if you can “prove” the fault was present at the point of sale.

Be warned. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you, i don't wish to reject the car only get the repair paid for under the warranty 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The warranty is probably worthless.

How old is the Landy,

which model is it ?

Mileage ?

What’s the registration?

Did you get the car inspected prior to purchase ?


Land Rover general leak oil for Britain,

especially as they get older,

however if it was leaking significantly it should have been pointed out to you.


Most Landy owners understand their characteristics, wear n tear should be expected, you haven’t purchased a new car. 


The retailers moans about your car are irrelevant, he is the professional and you are the layman.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know what to expect and general wear and tear. I just have used this site for many years and usually get a lot of helpful advice.


I just wanted to have some come back to say well actually ... you need to sort this and no i don't owe you any money


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well there you are – lawyers on your side. If you have a warranty then you would have to look at the terms of the warranty to see if the kind of defect you are experiencing is covered – but even if it's not, you still have your rights under the consumer rights act. As I've already pointed out though, you may have difficulty enforcing it.

I'm not sure what else to say. I'm afraid that the advice which is being handed out by user buyer-beware is generally speaking poor advice and we have had issues with this person before. He is well-intentioned but unfortunately not often right about what he says.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if you go to the dwp website there is an online SAR you can fill in to get all the details.   here is your old thread mentioned above  
    • Thanks for the advice, I will call the council Tuesday morning and see what they say, and then send the I/E form.   Something doesn't sit right with me on the whole thing.    I found an email I had sent to my MP early 2008 detailing the problems we were having with tax credits, and I go into great detail of our situation and  employment history.   Work was sporadical and I am pretty sure we were on benefits throughout one of those whole periods (I even had a post on here about the bank charges problem)   In fact most of those time periods mentioned in post 4 there was little work. Worst 2 years of our lives! I dont know how to find records of benefits though for that long ago.
    • I won a prize in a Raffle operated by an organisation holding an event at a local venue. The prizes were displayed on video screens in the venue and on a printed list by the person selling the tickets.  The prize I won was stated as "4 (four) weekend VIP tickets to Birmingham Pride"   - I did not open the envelope until the following day - it contained 3 (three) vouchers for weekend "Premium" tickets to Birmingham Pride (Premium being a lower priced ticket than VIP).   A friend who was at the event with me had the phone number of one of the organisers - there being no other obvious way to contact them - the person confirmed the prize was stated as 4 tickets, it was supposed to have been changed to 3, but that it had not been done.   I considered that this was suspicious, I can accept it might not have been possible to change the wording on the video screens, but the person selling the tickets could have clarified this verbally, and could have altered the "4" on the printed sheet to show "3".    As "compensation" I was offered free entry to their next event. That would be £7 per person (if they intended to include anyone else I was attending with) which in no way equates in financial or entertainment value of the Pride event, which has tickets priced £88.00, for two days of live acts including Marc Almond, Faithless and Human League.   I would like to know if the offer of prizes as originally stated and the exchange of money for entry in the raffle constitutes an intent to create legal relations - and as such, that I am entitled to 4 (four) VIP tickets (not Premium) and nothing else other than a cash alternative of equal value to the expected prize.   Incidentally, the vouchers state to send an email to an email address at birminghampride.com – which I did several weeks ago, but have not received any response.   I assume even if the Pride organisers fail to respond, the raffle organiser is still liable.
    • you realise Gick its very easy to make win 10 look like win 7.? I wouldn't move from 7 because I do lots of RS232 and other basic comms stuff with vintage gear and past 7 it would not longer do what I want.   win10 put everything back and works better than 7  ive even got it on a very old 1gb ram vio pc  if you want help pm me and I can sort things for you. 
  • Our picks

    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
        • Like
      • 0 replies
    • 30 Day Right To Reject - Vehicle Casualty Report. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415585-30-day-right-to-reject-vehicle-casualty-report/
      • 57 replies
  • Create New...