Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi   Your Document in post#11   Does not state anywhere that the Council have Served an Eviction Notice only that they are trying to find another property for the Tenants. (they could be stating what is mentioned in that Document as they probably expect that you the Landlord are going to serve Eviction Notice to the Tenants as you have ended your Agreement with them the Council)   You have still not answered the important question I asked at the beginning of my post#9 ???   I will ask again when you gave the correct Termination notice as per Clause 7 of that Agreement and the Council accepted it did you at the same time inform the Council to Service an Eviction Notice to the Tenants as No Fault as you required the Property back???
    • Hi   Thanks for the Link that was the first one of the two I came across.   Anyway have you looked at the link properly and click of the part 'People' this then shows you who the Director was and the named person is a Samantaha Bushby.   BIGGIN RENOVATIONS LTD people - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK BIGGIN RENOVATIONS LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual...   Is the above person the Wife that is refusing to discuss this matter/deposit paid   As stated in my post#4 look that link to report this company to Companies House and if the above info on the Director is correct you make sure and mention this and there refusal to deal with you and that the two son in laws that were at the start of the build until Builder/Owner passing asked for more money as under quoted.   Has the Building works to your Property been Completed?   Did any of the Building works require Planning Permission?   If yes to the above on Planning Permission have you contacted the Council to have a chat to a Building Inspector as you are unsure the works have been carried out correctly as you have found out the Company was dissolved some time before you signed a contract for these works and the works were carried out?              
    • The new prototype doesn't think much of the company's CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, either.View the full article
    • almost identical to patterns thread.    
    • immaterial   the claim is not about if the PAPLOC met requirements. judge wont give a flying...   just file our std loan defence...   example Defence    1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.    2. Paragraph x is noted and accepted I have in the past had financial dealings with [insert Original Creditor].I do not recall the precise details or agreement and have sought verification from the claimant and their solicitors.    3. Paragraph x is denied I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served last year from either the Claimant or [Original Creditor]    4.It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant,   the Claimants solicitors have failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14 on date xxxxx ,and the claimant remains in default of my section 7*  request, dated xxxxxx   therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:  (a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and  (b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and  (c) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;    5. On receipt of this claim I requested by way of a CPR 31.14 request and a section 77/78 request, copies of the documents referred to within the Claimants particulars to establish what the claim is for.   To date the Claimant has failed to comply to my section 7* request and their solicitors, [name them], likewise     6. As per Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.    7. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82 A of the consumer credit Act 1974.    8. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief. ..check and edit to suit.            
  • Our picks

Arrow claimform - Vanquis Card debt - poss SB'd


Thebearshouse
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 92 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

please complete this:

 

dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Arrow claimform - Vanquis Card debt - poss SB'd

ok thank you.

 

so arrows have sent an n244 now asking for the stay to be lifted and are going for a summary judgement?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

uh?

well the claim has been stayed since 28 days after you filed your defence

I might be going senile but as far as I understand it ..it cant just be resurrected by a change of solicitors??

 

to do that at this very late stage would require the claimant sending an N244 through their solicitors..

 

p'haps andyorch will clarify...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

how come?

 

claim was issued 12th August 2016

defence was filed within the allotted time?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

worth ringing the court to findout what is going on?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

simply informing you that the judge has recognised arrows removed shoo's

has not set any dates yet.

 

and are there any?

i'm wondering if the papers from arrows to remove shoo's caused the confusion somewhere

and that the case is not moving fwd and is stayed like before?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

begging letter.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

await the court to [ever] write

till then ignore

 

no you cant complain [yet]

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

resolvecall are simply another powerless DCA...

if they turn up film them on your phone

do not engage

tell them to leave and never return else you'll call police 101

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why are they abusing a court?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly no. the court haven't actually done anything, other than a series of automactic robotic actions...hence the term roboclaim. no human has seen anything to date.

 

its what DCA's have done for the last +40yrs because sooo many people believe they have magical powers when they don't and fall for their scams by wetting themselves and coughing up. and what does that do but fund the harassment  of 1M's of others when 9/10 no debt was ever owed anyway.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

type in resolvecall and read up

 

safe to totally ignore them.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...