Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ericsbrother - thanks for response. Please see photos as requested + more ExternalSignage_EntranceSet_v0.1.compressed.pdf ExampleBayMarkingsSet_v0.1.compressed.pdf InternalSignage_v0.1.compressed.pdf PayMachine_v0.2.compressed.pdf
    • Hi   As you are a Director of the Small Company have a wee look at this link: https://www.moneyadviceservice.org.uk/en/articles/dividing-business-interests-on-divorce-or-dissolution
    • as the card is still owed by the OC, and as you've seen, they usually are able to comply, then its enforceable. so no don't cease payment.   however get an SAR running.
    • HRT process for returning British citizens can be quick, if they show evidence of now being resident in the UK and working or looking for work. So important to take all documents to Job Centre appointment confirming ID, residency at an address, evidence of work or looking for work e.g. Job applications.   if enough evidence is provided a decision can be made in a few days. And once entitlement is confirmed, then your Son can apply for an advance payment.   Under Universal Credit, once the claim is up and running, then first normal payment made after 5 weeks from start date. Work search appointments regularity can depend on Job Centre and how busy they are. Some people have appointments every fortnight and others once a month approx.  The important thing is complying with commitment and not missing appointments to avoid sanction. It is people who fail to attend work search and other mandatory appointments or fail to show sufficient evidence of looking for work, who can end up with a sanction.
    • Thanks dx100uk - response to relevant questions provided below. I will provide photos of signage at entrance and further photos of marked bays at same location in separate response.   For a windscreen ticket (Notice To Driver) please answer the following questions....  I received a Parking Charge Notice (SIP)   1 The date of infringement? 11/05/2019 @ 16:01   2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? No   if you have then please post up whatever you sent and how you sent it and the date you sent it, suitably redacted. [as a PDF- follow the upload guide  N/A   has there been a response? N/A please post it up as well, suitably redacted. [as a PDF- follow the upload guide]   If you haven't appealed yet - ,.........   have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days] Not yet as only 12 days since alleged infringement what date is on it Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? N/A yet   3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N? ]N/A yet   4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK, did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process? N/A yet [it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances]   5 Who is the parking company? Simple Intelligent Parking (SIP)   6. where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? Harding Street, Manchester
  • Our picks

    • Future Comms issues. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416504-future-comms-issues/
      • 3 replies
    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
      • 0 replies
PDPJSM

Harsh Speeding Ticket?...Stupid I know, but is it worth contesting?

Recommended Posts

Hi all. 

Travelling along a very open piece of road near Wakefield, West Yorkshire (Asdale Road, between Denby Dale Road and Durkar Lown Lane). 

The road is off a series of dual carriageways, all with 40 mph limit. 

It is uniformly lit by streetlights along it's length, with no speed camera warning signs. 

 

All of a sudden, there are a couple of speed restriction signs indicating 30 mph. 

They are small - very small - and smaller than the 40 MPH signs they back onto. 

 

The Police have stationed a mobile speed van very close to the transition, and although I'm sticking very closely to the 40 mph limit, by the time I see the 30 signs and braked, I'm clocked at 36 mph in a 30 zone immediately after the signs! I know for a fact by the time I passed the van I was going under 30, just a short way past the signs.  Not fair, where's the "safety" reasoning in this, blah blah blah.  Yes, I know, stupid.

 

However, is the configuration they have here lawful? 

Looking at the Govt traffic signs manual chapter 3, it says "unless it's impractical to do so, standard size signs should be used", and then seems to indicate 600mm as the standard for 30 mph (I would guess the signs here as probably 300mm and max 450mm, not 600mm). 

 

Had the sign been larger, I'm pretty sure I would have at least had a chance of seeing the sign and braking sooner, and quite possibly would have been under the limit before the sign.

 

I have a clean license and will I expect be offered a speed awareness course as my last one was 3.5 years ago. 

However, it's VERY annoying. 

Can anyone advise on whether I should just suck it up and get on the course or whether I should contest it?

 

Thanks.

Asdale Road.JPG

Asdale Road 2.JPG

Size of Terminal Signs.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, there is no requirement to display camera warning signs.

 

If you want to challenge the legality of the signs be prepared for an expensive day out in court.

Many of the road signage regulations have been downgraded from mandatory to advisory (note the use of "should" rather than "must" in the notes you have provided).

 

The Magistrates will be concerned with whether the signage sufficiently conveys the change of limit in time for the driver to adjust his speed. Slowing from 40mph to 30mph does not require a long distance and you may struggle to convince a Bench that the signs (as displayed in the photograph) were insufficient.

 

If you were to defend the matter on the basis you suggest I believe you would fail.

The cost of failure will be high.

You will face an income related fine of half a week's net income (half a week's net income with obviously no discount for a guilty plea) but most crippling would be prosecution costs.

 

These will be at least £300 and possibly as high as £620.

And of course you will receive three penalty points.

 

If it was me? I'd take the course.

But you makes your choice a pays your money (or very hopefully, not!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Man in the Middle, appreciate the advice and yes I will probably just take the course.  Annoying though - historically I've been pretty much the last person to join in the conversation about money-grabbing authorities but after this episode where the setup was, well, almost quite literally "a setup" and nothing to do with road safety whatsoever, my view of them has changed completely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the other thing going against you is the presence of the correctly spaced lampposts.

 

When the first speed camera went live (in Twickenham) the speed set to activate the camera was 42mph for a 30 limit and the authorities expected to catch a few motorists in a week. The cameras ran out of film after 1000 motorists were snapped in the first 30 minutes.

 

The placing of cameras can be a matter for local politics bearing in mind who gets a share of the bounty and what noise the residents made to get one installed so i agree that there is a bit of a set up as far as that goes but it still requires people to go through there at the wrong speed for the Safety Camera Partnership to earn a few quid.

 

The real scandal is they are supposed to be preventative but if you put a sign out warning motorists about the presence of cameras you will get done for a myriad of offences such as obstructing justice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Don't be fooled, it's all a money making scheme and nothing more.

The fines are issued by machines without human input, so if you are just over the limit at 3am empty road,  you would get the same treatment of someone dangerously speeding in traffic at 5pm.

 

The set up is made to maximise profit, many cameras are fitted on stretches where there's nothing around a nice dual carriageway with a 30 or 40 limit. 

 

But then you can do 60 in a bendy country lane where two cars can't pass at the same time.

 

Camera vans parked up to make money more or less everywhere. 

 

No, i haven't got done many times, only once years ago but it was a speed trap and the officer who stopped me kind of admitted it.

 

In some civil places, to make motorists slow down where there's a real need of doing 30, they put camera signs and visual warnings; everyone sticks to the speed limit and nobody makes money. 

 

In my experience the speeding tickets are just to be accepted as an extra tax for us motorists, unless there's a gross mistake i.e. limit is 40 and they clocked the car at 36 but still issued the ticket.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like ericsbrother I think you may have a problem with the streetlights which probably indicate a restricted road with a limit of 30 mph - no signs (except for the lights themselves) necessary.  How far apart are the lights?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for your replies.  King12345 I've come to the same conclusion unfortunately, which I think is a shame as I've always defended the police and placed my trust in them in the same way as I tend to trust the medical profession (i.e. they have the benefit of the doubt....they must know what they're doing etc.).  And all for a few quid (on their side.....self employment means I will lose much more having to attend the course etc.).

 

In terms of the spacing of streetlights that people seem to be focusing on, I don't know whether they're "correctly" spaced or not, but to be honest the street lights and their placement was one thing that lulled me into a false sense of security.....as I drove down the road I knew I was driving through a 40 area, despite there being no signs indicating this for a considerable distance.  Also my car has a speed limit indicator on the dash that was showing 40.  I stuck rigidly under that speed limit. So the fact that there is a streetlight configuration that is completely uniform running first through a 40 zone and straight into a 30 zone with just (in my view) an undersized 30 sign delimiter was in my view, far from being a reason to note a 30 zone and a required speed change, a major contributor to me not noticing a change in the speed limit until it was too late.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speed trap.

Pay the unofficial tax and move on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, PDPJSM said:

In terms of the spacing of streetlights that people seem to be focusing on, I don't know whether they're "correctly" spaced or not, but to be honest the street lights and their placement was one thing that lulled me into a false sense of security.....as I drove down the road I knew I was driving through a 40 area, despite there being no signs indicating this for a considerable distance.  Also my car has a speed limit indicator on the dash that was showing 40.  I stuck rigidly under that speed limit. So the fact that there is a streetlight configuration that is completely uniform running first through a 40 zone and straight into a 30 zone with just (in my view) an undersized 30 sign delimiter was in my view, far from being a reason to note a 30 zone and a required speed change, a major contributor to me not noticing a change in the speed limit until it was too late.

 

The difficulty you face with that line of reasoning is that the presence of a system of street lighting (spaced at no more than 200 yards) bestows a default 30mph limit. Only if that default is to be modified are small "repeaters" necessary. In fact it is not permissible to install 30mph repeaters where there are streetlights and the default applies. Street lighting is an important part of speed limit provision. Case law has determined that the lights themselves provide notice of the limit (making the stretch a "restricted" road) and it is no defence if, say, one gap is 201 yards or  if one or all of the lights are inoperable. Courts have also ruled that it does not matter if the terminal signs (which you contend are inadequate) are obscured by, say vegetation thus making your contention unlikely to cut the mustard.

 

A simple rule for street lighting is that it denotes a 30mph limit unless you see repeaters to the contrary (you will not see repeaters showing 30). Where there is no street lighting the default is the National Speed Limit unless you see repeaters to the contrary.

 

2 hours ago, king12345 said:

Speed trap.

Pay the unofficial tax and move on.

 

+1 (though I do not accept that the penalty is an "unofficial tax!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe because you don't drive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, king12345 said:

Maybe because you don't drive.

 

No. Maybe because I've been driving for many years and know the difference between a tax and a fine or fixed penalty (or even a fee for a course if that is what the OP is offered and he accepts). But let's not allow the thread to degenerate into an unnecessary argument as it won't help the OP one little bit.

Edited by Man in the middle
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meh 😚

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...