Jump to content
PDPJSM

Harsh Speeding Ticket?...Stupid I know, but is it worth contesting?

Recommended Posts

Hi all. 

Travelling along a very open piece of road near Wakefield, West Yorkshire (Asdale Road, between Denby Dale Road and Durkar Lown Lane). 

The road is off a series of dual carriageways, all with 40 mph limit. 

It is uniformly lit by streetlights along it's length, with no speed camera warning signs. 

 

All of a sudden, there are a couple of speed restriction signs indicating 30 mph. 

They are small - very small - and smaller than the 40 MPH signs they back onto. 

 

The Police have stationed a mobile speed van very close to the transition, and although I'm sticking very closely to the 40 mph limit, by the time I see the 30 signs and braked, I'm clocked at 36 mph in a 30 zone immediately after the signs! I know for a fact by the time I passed the van I was going under 30, just a short way past the signs.  Not fair, where's the "safety" reasoning in this, blah blah blah.  Yes, I know, stupid.

 

However, is the configuration they have here lawful? 

Looking at the Govt traffic signs manual chapter 3, it says "unless it's impractical to do so, standard size signs should be used", and then seems to indicate 600mm as the standard for 30 mph (I would guess the signs here as probably 300mm and max 450mm, not 600mm). 

 

Had the sign been larger, I'm pretty sure I would have at least had a chance of seeing the sign and braking sooner, and quite possibly would have been under the limit before the sign.

 

I have a clean license and will I expect be offered a speed awareness course as my last one was 3.5 years ago. 

However, it's VERY annoying. 

Can anyone advise on whether I should just suck it up and get on the course or whether I should contest it?

 

Thanks.

Asdale Road.JPG

Asdale Road 2.JPG

Size of Terminal Signs.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, there is no requirement to display camera warning signs.

 

If you want to challenge the legality of the signs be prepared for an expensive day out in court.

Many of the road signage regulations have been downgraded from mandatory to advisory (note the use of "should" rather than "must" in the notes you have provided).

 

The Magistrates will be concerned with whether the signage sufficiently conveys the change of limit in time for the driver to adjust his speed. Slowing from 40mph to 30mph does not require a long distance and you may struggle to convince a Bench that the signs (as displayed in the photograph) were insufficient.

 

If you were to defend the matter on the basis you suggest I believe you would fail.

The cost of failure will be high.

You will face an income related fine of half a week's net income (half a week's net income with obviously no discount for a guilty plea) but most crippling would be prosecution costs.

 

These will be at least £300 and possibly as high as £620.

And of course you will receive three penalty points.

 

If it was me? I'd take the course.

But you makes your choice a pays your money (or very hopefully, not!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Man in the Middle, appreciate the advice and yes I will probably just take the course.  Annoying though - historically I've been pretty much the last person to join in the conversation about money-grabbing authorities but after this episode where the setup was, well, almost quite literally "a setup" and nothing to do with road safety whatsoever, my view of them has changed completely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the other thing going against you is the presence of the correctly spaced lampposts.

 

When the first speed camera went live (in Twickenham) the speed set to activate the camera was 42mph for a 30 limit and the authorities expected to catch a few motorists in a week. The cameras ran out of film after 1000 motorists were snapped in the first 30 minutes.

 

The placing of cameras can be a matter for local politics bearing in mind who gets a share of the bounty and what noise the residents made to get one installed so i agree that there is a bit of a set up as far as that goes but it still requires people to go through there at the wrong speed for the Safety Camera Partnership to earn a few quid.

 

The real scandal is they are supposed to be preventative but if you put a sign out warning motorists about the presence of cameras you will get done for a myriad of offences such as obstructing justice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Don't be fooled, it's all a money making scheme and nothing more.

The fines are issued by machines without human input, so if you are just over the limit at 3am empty road,  you would get the same treatment of someone dangerously speeding in traffic at 5pm.

 

The set up is made to maximise profit, many cameras are fitted on stretches where there's nothing around a nice dual carriageway with a 30 or 40 limit. 

 

But then you can do 60 in a bendy country lane where two cars can't pass at the same time.

 

Camera vans parked up to make money more or less everywhere. 

 

No, i haven't got done many times, only once years ago but it was a speed trap and the officer who stopped me kind of admitted it.

 

In some civil places, to make motorists slow down where there's a real need of doing 30, they put camera signs and visual warnings; everyone sticks to the speed limit and nobody makes money. 

 

In my experience the speeding tickets are just to be accepted as an extra tax for us motorists, unless there's a gross mistake i.e. limit is 40 and they clocked the car at 36 but still issued the ticket.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like ericsbrother I think you may have a problem with the streetlights which probably indicate a restricted road with a limit of 30 mph - no signs (except for the lights themselves) necessary.  How far apart are the lights?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?





  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if you go to the dwp website there is an online SAR you can fill in to get all the details.   here is your old thread mentioned above  
    • Thanks for the advice, I will call the council Tuesday morning and see what they say, and then send the I/E form.   Something doesn't sit right with me on the whole thing.    I found an email I had sent to my MP early 2008 detailing the problems we were having with tax credits, and I go into great detail of our situation and  employment history.   Work was sporadical and I am pretty sure we were on benefits throughout one of those whole periods (I even had a post on here about the bank charges problem)   In fact most of those time periods mentioned in post 4 there was little work. Worst 2 years of our lives! I dont know how to find records of benefits though for that long ago.
    • I won a prize in a Raffle operated by an organisation holding an event at a local venue. The prizes were displayed on video screens in the venue and on a printed list by the person selling the tickets.  The prize I won was stated as "4 (four) weekend VIP tickets to Birmingham Pride"   - I did not open the envelope until the following day - it contained 3 (three) vouchers for weekend "Premium" tickets to Birmingham Pride (Premium being a lower priced ticket than VIP).   A friend who was at the event with me had the phone number of one of the organisers - there being no other obvious way to contact them - the person confirmed the prize was stated as 4 tickets, it was supposed to have been changed to 3, but that it had not been done.   I considered that this was suspicious, I can accept it might not have been possible to change the wording on the video screens, but the person selling the tickets could have clarified this verbally, and could have altered the "4" on the printed sheet to show "3".    As "compensation" I was offered free entry to their next event. That would be £7 per person (if they intended to include anyone else I was attending with) which in no way equates in financial or entertainment value of the Pride event, which has tickets priced £88.00, for two days of live acts including Marc Almond, Faithless and Human League.   I would like to know if the offer of prizes as originally stated and the exchange of money for entry in the raffle constitutes an intent to create legal relations - and as such, that I am entitled to 4 (four) VIP tickets (not Premium) and nothing else other than a cash alternative of equal value to the expected prize.   Incidentally, the vouchers state to send an email to an email address at birminghampride.com – which I did several weeks ago, but have not received any response.   I assume even if the Pride organisers fail to respond, the raffle organiser is still liable.
    • you realise Gick its very easy to make win 10 look like win 7.? I wouldn't move from 7 because I do lots of RS232 and other basic comms stuff with vintage gear and past 7 it would not longer do what I want.   win10 put everything back and works better than 7  ive even got it on a very old 1gb ram vio pc  if you want help pm me and I can sort things for you. 
  • Our picks

    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
        • Like
      • 0 replies
    • 30 Day Right To Reject - Vehicle Casualty Report. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415585-30-day-right-to-reject-vehicle-casualty-report/
      • 57 replies
×
×
  • Create New...