Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Paying for a dash cam on a Motability car


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1821 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I’ve just ordered a motability car, it was one they had in a showroom, they’ve gone and charged me £215 for a dash cam that’s fitted, is this allowed?

 

its caused an affordability issue but if I don’t pay it I’ll be waiting months for another car so I’ve got no choice but doesn’t seem right to me and have never heard of this before.

 

Anything I can do?

 

Thank you.

Edited by thecookiemonster
Link to post
Share on other sites

so is it full cost of the PIP monthly mobility element?

why cant they take it out?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly i'm pretty sure they can do it.

pers why don't you go elsewhere?

 

so in a nutshell they want an upfront sum to release the car to you I expect.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why cant you go elsewhere?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can but my car needs to go back due to worsening health conditions which is why motability agreed to cancel my existing car. 

 

I've spoken to a lot of car dealers and the waiting lists at the moment are horrendous, months for cars to come in (August for a lot of them)

 

I can't wait until then because of the issues my car is causing, so I don't have many options and this is the car that was suitable, so its a real pain. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its an optional extra and you have not requested it then it should be removed or offered to you at an extra additional price.

 

If its already fitted and included....then surely it cant be an optional extra ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

mutability car providers that partake in the scheme work in funny ways

they provide cars with built in extras that bump up the 'take away' sum that needs to be paid before you can take the car then its paid by all or some of the mobility payment of the benefit the buyer gets.

 

you can ask for extras to be fitted at a cost, but you cant have them 'taken off'...its part of the packages the dealers sign up to with Motability that they must provide or bided for to get on the Motability scheme and be an approved dealer.

 

its a really strange set up that I had to go thru myself a few years back

we wanted the winter pack that was offered on our car, took 6 weeks to get it done when the package was already on the shelf at the dealer, they had to get approval to fit it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dash cams are not listed on the official Motability scheme as a required optional extra ?

 

https://news.motability.co.uk/motoring/optional-extras-your-next-car-should-have/

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

interesting as that was an option when we had ours 2 trs ago.

wonder if this is an old car on an old option that they  still have left to ship....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I’m really unhappy with the whole situation I’ll start at the beginning.

 

I’m very unhappy with the service I have had, even though the car is ok, I did not get the car that was 100% suitable for me and should have had because firstly at first they were not honest with me and didn’t tell me that they had a Renault Captur GT Line in stock at Renault Aldershot SMC even though they supposedly checked on their system.

On Monday 1st April 2019, I ordered a Renault Captur Iconic at My local Renault SMC, it was apparently a car that had already been cancelled and was on the forecourt, I ordered it because they informed me that they did not have a GT Line Captur in stock which is the one that met my requirements and the one I wanted.

However, they were not honest with me and I found out that the other local Renault SMC had one in stock at their branch in the showroom which I could have.

So on Thursday 4th April, I went to the other local Renault and I viewed and sat in the Captur GT Line and made sure it was suitable.

Me and Renault agreed I would have it, Even though I already had a Iconic Renault Captur on order from the other local Renault branch, they were happy to change this, so it was all agreed for me to have the Renault GT Line model.

This met my requirements because of the height of the seats and the heated seats which would be beneficial for my pain issues.

So it was all agreed but then suddenly when I got home Renault wanted to charge me £215 on top of the £595 advance payment of the car because it had a dashcam installed, I have the emails to prove this also.

I spoke to someone from Motability on Friday 5th April regarding this and was told by Motability that if I wanted the car without the dashcam then I could do that and Renault would have to take it off.

However, Renault refused and I couldn’t have the car I wanted and which was more suitable and I had to have the Iconic Renault Captur which I really didn’t want. I felt pressured into having it because they wouldn’t let me have the other one unless I paid £215 for the dashcam, making it over £830 in total with the advance payment on top of the dashcam fee.

The GT Line version was more suitable for me and that is what I wanted and what me and Renault agreed I was going to have.

Then I felt I couldn’t back out for the order of the Iconic Renault Captur so I picked it up on Monday, however the other one is what was more suitable.

I’m really not happy with this because I haven’t got the model I wanted to have and not only felt pressured but Renault made it extremely hard for me and went against what I was told by Motability.

It’s been a stressful experience and after having the opportunity to change my car I’m disappointed that I haven’t got the car that met all of my requirements.

As I say I have all emails confirming I wanted the GT Line version and it was all agreed and all emails from both local Renault dealers stating they would go ahead and arrange for me to collect the Renault Captur GT Line model.

Plus the emails stating they would charge me £215 for the dashcam and also then refusing to remove the dashcam therefore leaving me with no choice but to have the other car and going against what I was told by Motability.

I have several emails that will show all of what I have said.

 

I will also add that I wasn’t given the chance to inspect the car when I collected it and just had to enter the PIN and it had 12 miles on the clock.

 

I have put in a complaint to Motability but don’t expect anything to happen unfortunately.
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it were me I'd have gone for one of the sister cars - Nissan Qashqai. Never did like Renaults colours particularly there take on what you say is brown/black, don't see how the can call that orange unless I need to go to Specsavers again.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep to me it isn’t as advertised, there’s the issues with the Renault I wanted and the dashcam issue meaning I had to have this one.

 

No inspection before entering my PIN.

 

12 miles on the clock and it definitely isn’t Desert Orange/Black, it’s Brown/Black and I really don’t like that either.

 

Plud the other issue above, actually I’ve just noticed that I’ve got a response from a Motability via email, will update shortly.......

Edited by thecookiemonster
Link to post
Share on other sites

And I would have liked to have had a Qashqai but I can only drive automatics and with the heated seats which I wanted it was well over £1,000.

 

The Captur GT Line with heated seats was £595 which was about my maximum budget.

 

I'm not happy with this one but I won’t be able to cancel.

 

i had to cancel my Clio on Motability that I only had for 8 months because of worsening health issues and I needed a car with much higher seat so I could get out without feeling like I was climbing out of the car everytime I got out.

Edited by thecookiemonster
Link to post
Share on other sites

In an email Motability have said I should have pulled out if I didn’t want this one even if I was pressured.

 

I've sent them a response with a picture of the car and again stated all the issues.

 

They've said if I wanted it referred to the Customer Relations team it will be so that’s what I’ve requested.

 

I don’t expect much to happen but we will see.

Edited by thecookiemonster
Link to post
Share on other sites

What I need to add is this:

 

On 4th April Renault agreed for me to have the GT Line and said they would cancel the order for the Captur Iconic, I have that in writing.

 

Renault didn’t cancel it and started playing hardball and I ended up with the Captur Iconic lower model without what I wanted or needed.

Edited by thecookiemonster
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just an update for you all.

 

My complaint was passed onto a customer relations manager who is currently investigating.

 

My biggest reasons were that on 4th April 2019 Renault said they were cancelling the order for my car that I’ve just got and thay didn’t.

 

The colour to me isn’t what was ordered or described and I felt pressured into getting this one with the dashcam issues that Renault caused with the other car that I wanted from them.

 

Also they didn’t offer a test drive and I didn’t get to inspect the car before entering the PIN.

I feel I have a case maybe quite a good one too, what do you think?

 

The latest email today states that the customer relations manager is gathering further information and is going to consult with Motabilitys legal team.

 

Have I got them rattled? Does this mean they will end up letting me change the car free of charge do you think?

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...