Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Egg loan/card PPI claim - now Canada SQ Ops


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1666 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I default on the loan after the 7th payment and it eventually gets sold to a DCA, starting a downwards spiral towards bankruptcy (avoiding it ultimately) - Had I known I had PPI, I might have attempted to claim it.. ;)

 

that is the sum total of payments I made on loan 4 - I think that's why I was rolling the loan amounts over, sub-consciously I was trying to maximise the claim..

Edited by dunnie1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

So, next steps? FOS questionnaire isn't it?

 

What do I include in this as I was never aware of having PPI, and was never offered the opportunity to claim when I went into default - this seesm worth including I would have thought. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep

FOS CQ

spreadsheet

covering letter

 

never knew you had PPI, would have attempted BK if i'd know, nobody at EGG ever told you you had it IN. date

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

first draft

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Ref: Credit Card: **************** Personal loans ****/****/****/****

 

 I believe I have been mis-sold three payment protection  policies and would like to request a full refund of my premiums, plus interest paid.

 

Credit card PPI payments between 11/06/2002 and 01/11/2006 @ APR 13.9% amount to £714.14, and with statutory 8% interest applied this totals £1,444.08 as at 22/07/2019, with interest accruing daily.

Personal loan PPI payments across the four loans (including one partial PPI rebate) total £231.89, with statutory 8% interest applied this totals £547.32 s at 22/07/2019, with interest accruing daily.

 

The reason I was mis-sold PPI is because I was unaware I had bought it, and therefore the following applies:

 

·         I was not asked whether I had any other insurance which would cover the loan.

·         I was not told I could buy PPI elsewhere to cover the loan\credit card.

·         I paid upfront for the PPI but it was not explained that there were some PPI policies where you could pay monthly.

·         My PPI was an upfront premium and I repaid the loan early and received only a partial refund. I received no refund on the final loan that went into default.

·         The Terms & Conditions of the small print were not fully explained to me.

·         You are not allowed to make PPI a condition of taking out the loan unless you include the costs of PPI in the quoted interest rate, which you did not do.

·         In forcing me to buy this policy, you have also breached paragraph 8.6 of the Banking Code, to which you are a signatory

·         No refund was applied once the products went into default, nor was it explained to me that I having become unemployed, I was able to claim – I was instead subject to repeated calls asking for the money to be re-paid, and eventually the debts were sold to DCA’s – this significantly contributed to my financial distress and prolonged my struggle to re-gain credit-worthiness, my health (Chronic stress and anxiety) and ultimately gainful employment.

 

Insurers are under an obligation to ensure that the policy they are selling is clearly included in T&C’s, and options for claiming against the policy are clearly articulated  to the potential claimant.

 

I am requesting a full refund of all my insurance payments, plus interest, which total £ 1991.40 (as @ 22/07/2019).

 

If I do not receive a favourable response from you I will pursue this claim through the Financial Ombudsman.

 

Yours sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

each claim needs it own covering letter.

its own spreadsheets

and its own FOS CQ

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so 2 sep claims 

 

1 card

1 loan chain

 

id not be using a scattergun approach on your letter nor the FOS CQ for each.

 

you claim you knew nothing about the PPI even being charged is simple and good enough - cut it there.

you don't need to clarify that.

 

and simply put you charged me £xxx ppi increasing by £xx daily until settled

 

 

they know the score 

cut out the waffle.

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Ok, I have an update:

 

  1. Loan claim - still being processed due to backlog, with Canada Sq Op apologising and stating they need another 8 weeks
  2. Credit card claim - Complaint upheld and offered £1078.05 as F&F settlement - However - this is less than I asked for (my original details below)

"Credit card PPI payments between 11/06/2002 and 01/11/2006 @ APR 13.9% amount to £714.14, and with statutory 8% interest applied this totals £1,444.08 as at 22/07/2019, with interest accruing daily."

 

The shortfall is due to Canada Sq Ops using a contractual interest rate of 5.425% instead of 13.9% which I intend to challenge. 

 

Additionally, I have been charged basic rate tax which was unexpected - I understand I can claim this back from the Inland Revenue though, or is this another underhand tactic?

 

Thanks,

 

Dunnie1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pdf only please

Read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure why you'd want a pdf - the image I posted was not blurry, upside down, difficult to read etc and I've posted images of text before - I've also used text to pdf scanners and the quality is in fact worse than the image I posted...

 

Anyway, the contents are discussed in my previous post so the image of the letter was a nice to have, not vital to understanding next steps -to which I wondered if you had any advice or if there are any templates which challenge an underpayment of contractual interest?

 

Also, is it usual to have income tax applied and should I challenge that or claim back from IR?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you read upload...

the best way is to scan to jpg, redact, convert to PDF and upload....

 

many devices cant zoom easily and posting images directly to a post forces people on limited bandwidth or speeds or data costs to download it.

there should be a choice for people to download or not.

it also slows our live server, whereby files are stored in a differing on demand only.

 

the tax is sadly nothing to do with them its the law

they have to charge it and fwd it to HMRC.

 

never seen a credit card with a 5% int rate, who are they kidding!!

don't know of any template ....a simple refusal letter asking for a detailed breakdown and questioning their correct int rate for that time should be enough

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure does.

But ill admit ive never known can Sq to get things wrong to date

They're usually spot on

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...