Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Egg loan/card PPI claim - now Canada SQ Ops


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1659 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

First time potential PPI claimant - Hopefully your into the whole brevity thing:

 

Used PPI checker with Canada Square, and confirmed two loans and one credit card with PPI - approx from 2000/2001. I don't have statements, loan agreements or any paperwork. I now know the account numbers however by using this online checker.

 

Drafted SAR addressed to data controller so I can assess whether it is mis-sold and if so, interest payments (reciprocal compound plus stat 8%?)

 

I was completely unaware (from memory) of having PPI, and certainly didn't know to claim when I lost my job soon after. All debts written off and sold to DCA - I understand this doesn't affect PPI claim (should I have one)

 

PPI is also not statute barred I assume.

 

Next steps:

1) raise speculative complaint whilst I await SAR return using online complaint form

2)receive SAR output, assess for mis-selling, independently calc amount, challenge above if applicable

3) Either complete FOS questionnaire or prep for SC court? (bit hazy on best approach here)

 

Welcome any advice - thanks in advance!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

no just send them an sar.

THEN WHEN YOU HAVE THE INFO...

 

cards use the CISHEET with a claim to date when they stopped their int, then that whole figure goes into the statint sheet [to get the 8% you are entitled to until they settle] as a whole sum the day after

 

loans solely use the statint sheet detailing every PPI payment made and its date..till they settle.

 

each claim needs an FOS questionnaire and a brief covering letter.

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

post things up here 1st and well check them.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, thanks - I've used the standard SARs template, included the acct numbers, my name, current address and address history (only additions to letter) and plan to send to this address

 

Citigroup Centre 
33 Canada Square 
Canary Wharf 
London 
E14 5LB

Edited by dunnie1
Link to post
Share on other sites

have you moved since taking this out and CITI are not aware of the move?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the loans\card back in 2000/2001 (ish), defaulted and have moved 5 or 6 times since yes. I initially supplied 3 prev addresses and Citi couldn't find any record of me, I then re-submitted an additional 2 previous addresses (5 in total) I found within my CRA file, and had success in finding the accounts mentioned above.

 

Thanks,

 

Dunnie1

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you are awaiting the data then?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you only need one sar

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding my proposal to raise a speculative complaint whilst I await SAR return using online complaint form

- I totally appreciate you can't trust these companies to provide accurate information and properly calculate interest etc,

it was more to find out whether they initially thought I had a claim,

and what amount they might offer

- and to then calculate it separately using the info from the SAR

- more out of interest to see how close they would be

- certainly not to replace the SAR/FOS q approach

- you think this would just muddy the waters as I have no information on which to base a PPI claim at the moment then?

 

Thank dx btw, for your prompt replies

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't tip them off!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi, should I have received confirmation from Citgroup with respect to my SAR request? I've heard nothing thus far - Should I chase or wait the 40 days? I sent the request to this address.

 

Citigroup Centre 
33 Canada Square 
Canary Wharf 
London 
E14 5LB

Link to post
Share on other sites

its 30 days

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its 30 days from the date of the letter tomorrow, so I'll raise an ICO complaint and send it tomorrow, as per SAR guidance. Should I also chase this with Citigroup as well?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no harm in ringing them and asking.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've raised a complaint both with the ICO, Citigroup direct via [email protected] and re-sent a SAR request to another address as advised by Citigroup, explaining their still in breach of the 30 day deadline regardless of the address I used (as the original was listed as the data commissioner address)

 

Citigroup
CS Operations

PO Box 4903 
Worthing

BN99 3AR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for submitting a complaint about the processing of your personal information.
 
The ICO’s role 
 
Part of our role is to consider complaints from individuals who believe there has been an infringement of the Data Protection law. 
 
We use complaints to build up a picture of an organisation’s information rights practices so that we can identify and target poor performing organisations. Details of the action we have taken is available on our website.
 
Your complaint
 
We have considered the issues that you have raised with us and have written to the Chief Executive, via the Data Protection Officer, to explain that we expect their organisation to work with you to resolve any outstanding matters. 
 
One of the ICO’s strategic goals is to increase the public’s trust and confidence in how personal data is used and made available. 
 
In this case, we expect the organisation to fully explain to you how they have complied with their obligations under the law as comprehensively as possible, including correcting any issues that they have identified or clarifying any areas of misunderstanding.  
 
I have attached a copy of the letter that we have issued to the Data Controller and expect they will be in contact with you in due course. 
 
 
Yours sincerely
 
Angela Payne
Case Officer (Mon, Tues, Weds & Thurs am)
Information Commissioner’s Office
0330 414 6515
[email protected]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Received my SAR back finally, suddenly once I'd complained they were super quick - strange that. Had a look through and have:

 

Credit card 

  1. credit agreements
  2. statements for credit card (each mthly statement has credit card payment protector amount deducted - assuming this is ppi)
  3. date ppi commenced (11/06/2002)
  4. various system & database outputs detailing the account history, up to closure and movement to DCA

Loans (4, but 2 with ppi)

  1. PPI hub report
    1. detailing interest accrued and maturity date (4 records)
    2. Which accounts had ppi, and date the were cancelled (not by me, probably by top up)
    3. loan balance when cancelled
  2. loan agreements for each loan (2 with loan payment protection amounts on)
  3. account info report, with princial amount, interest, PPI balance, PPI rebate, PPI type
  4. Statements

I'll post specifics soon.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so as post 2 now then.

 

if one loan refinanced another, it will be ONE claim for all the loans in the chain

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll get on it - its difficult to understand what's going on as the information is linked by internal reference\application number rather than my account number for the loans, but I'll see how I get on - thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm getting charged 1.093 a mth which is 13.11 (multipled by 12)

 

Date of
Charge
Description Amount of
Charge
Number of
Days Elapsed
Compound
Interest
                   
10/07/2002 Credit Card Payment Protection £2.60 6166 £18.25
10/08/2002 Credit Card Payment Protection £9.44 6135 £65.48
10/09/2002 Credit Card Payment Protection £12.09 6104 £82.87
10/10/2002 Credit Card Payment Protection £16.99 6074 £115.11
10/11/2002 Credit Card Payment Protection £18.52 6043 £123.97
10/12/2002 Credit Card Payment Protection £18.63 6013 £123.26
10/01/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £0.12 5982 £0.78
10/02/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £1.50 5951 £9.69
10/03/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £2.34 5923 £14.95
10/04/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £7.42 5892 £46.83
10/05/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £10.47 5862 £65.31
10/06/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £13.30 5831 £81.96
10/07/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £14.55 5801 £88.61
10/08/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £15.60 5770 £93.86
10/09/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £18.45 5739 £109.66
10/10/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £22.05 5709 £129.51
10/11/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £22.11 5678 £128.28
10/12/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £22.28 5648 £127.74
10/01/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £21.99 5617 £124.53
10/02/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £22.07 5586 £123.46
10/03/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £22.02 5557 £121.76
10/04/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £21.98 5526 £120.05
10/05/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £22.43 5496 £121.04
10/06/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £0.29 5465 £1.55
10/07/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £0.25 5435 £1.32
10/08/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £0.25 5404 £1.30
10/09/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £10.50 5373 £53.93
10/10/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £23.36 5343 £118.54
10/11/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £23.42 5312 £117.36
10/12/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £23.81 5282 £117.87
10/01/2005 Credit Card Payment Protection £23.97 5251 £117.18
10/02/2005 Credit Card Payment Protection £24.61 5220 £118.80
10/03/2005 Credit Card Payment Protection £25.15 5192 £120.03

 

Inputted into CIsheet above, and taken compound interest figures and put into statintsheet, as below

 

Date of
Charge
Description Amount of
Charge
Number of
Days Elapsed
Interest at
8% Simple
                   
10/07/2002 Credit Card Payment Protection £18.25 6166 £24.76
10/08/2002 Credit Card Payment Protection £65.48 6135 £88.38
10/09/2002 Credit Card Payment Protection £82.87 6104 £111.28
10/10/2002 Credit Card Payment Protection £115.11 6074 £153.81
10/11/2002 Credit Card Payment Protection £123.97 6043 £164.82
10/12/2002 Credit Card Payment Protection £123.26 6013 £163.06
10/01/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £0.78 5982 £1.03
10/02/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £9.69 5951 £12.68
10/03/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £14.95 5923 £19.48
10/04/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £46.83 5892 £60.71
10/05/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £65.31 5862 £84.23
10/06/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £81.96 5831 £105.14
10/07/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £88.61 5801 £113.09
10/08/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £93.86 5770 £119.14
10/09/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £109.66 5739 £138.45
10/10/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £129.51 5709 £162.66
10/11/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £128.28 5678 £160.24
10/12/2003 Credit Card Payment Protection £127.74 5648 £158.72
10/01/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £124.53 5617 £153.89
10/02/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £123.46 5586 £151.72
10/03/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £121.76 5557 £148.86
10/04/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £120.05 5526 £145.94
10/05/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £121.04 5496 £146.36
10/06/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £1.55 5465 £1.86
10/07/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £1.32 5435 £1.57
10/08/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £1.30 5404 £1.55
10/09/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £53.93 5373 £63.75
10/10/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £118.54 5343 £139.34
10/11/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £117.36 5312 £137.15
10/12/2004 Credit Card Payment Protection £117.87 5282 £136.97
10/01/2005 Credit Card Payment Protection £117.18 5251 £135.37
10/02/2005 Credit Card Payment Protection £118.80 5220 £136.43
10/03/2005 Credit Card Payment Protection £120.03 5192 £137.10

 

I'm assuming I would be due compound interest and stat for the same duration

i.e. 10/07/2002 charge is £2.60, plus CI is £18.25, plus stat is £24.76 as both use elapsed days of 6166

 

Question on CISheet - what APR do I use?

 

Credit agreement states:

12.6% purchases

13.9% balance transfers

cash advance 16.3%

 

Highest/lowest/most used? (that would be purchases)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...